Showing posts with label WaPo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WaPo. Show all posts

Monday, December 26, 2022

Kamala Harris upset media fails to focus on her strengths [LOL]



Vice President Kamala Hahaharris (D) is the person you hear about who goes on a job interview and when asked the question: "What is the one thing you would change about yourself?" answers with something like: "I try for perfection and the few times I don't get it, I get upset." Yes, Kamala Harris is a freaking joke as the second person in command of the nation.

Now the chronic giggler is complaining this week that the media is giving her poor coverage. She is saying with a straight face that the press doesn't focus on "the strength of [my] leadership." 

She really said that.

“There are things that I’ve done as vice president," she began, as the words flew from her nostrils, "that fully demonstrate the strength of my leadership as vice president that have not received the kind of coverage that I think Dobbs did receive." She was speaking about the June 24th Supreme Court decision 
overturning Roe v. Wade and returning the question of abortion to the states.

“What you’ve been able to see,” the veep honked, is “based on what gets covered.”

Like the southern border and her hard and difficult work there as the so-called "Border Czar." [Don't you just live the Russian terms the left uses to describe themselves. It's almost as if they wish they were born there.]

In his opinion piece, Washington Post's Jonathan Capehart argued that contrary to conventional wisdom, Harris, 58, has “had a most excellent year” and cited three supposed “tent poles” of her 2022. Unfortunately, Capehart failed to mention the actual tent poles up along the streets of her city of San Francisco, and all over Democrat-led American cities and towns as a result of homelessness and illegal immigration.

One of those tent poles, Capehart said, was Harris’ appearance at the Munich Security Conference in February just before Russia invaded Ukraine. Like the real tent poles, Capehart failed to mention that Hahaharris was mocked and ridiculed at that conference after telling reporters how much Europe enjoyed “peace and security” since the end of World War. 

Which Jim Carrey movie comes to mind when you see them together?

Somehow she failed to take into account the 40-year Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe, the 1990's violence in Yugoslavia and the Russian invasion of Georgia in 2008 as well as the annexation of Crimea in 2014.

Kamala Harris is a dunce who got to where she is now on her immutable characteristics and by using her body to advance politically. 

She either is too dense to understand that the SCOTUS decision on abortion merely left abortion laws up to the individual states and took away the federal power of deciding law, or she's a liar like her boss.

Wouldn't it be nice to have a job in which you don't have to do your job and still get to keep it? That's called being a politician--and both sides are guilty as hell.


Thursday, July 14, 2022

Will Biden's teleprompter tell him to bring up Khashoggi to Saudi bone saw guy?

"It's this long; I'm not kidding"

The White House has not revealed whether the presidential teleprompter will mention Jamal Khashoggi by name because it is difficult to pronounce for President Biden, and it's likely he will not know who Khashoggi was nor how to respond to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bone Sawman should the prince throw a question back at Joe.

Khashoggi's widow, Hanan Elatr Khashoggi, said however, that Biden's handlers assured her that he would mention her dead husband within the first several paragraphs on the teleprompter but did not reveal exactly what President Biden will be told to mumble.

Biden will meet with the prince later this week after he meets with Israeli leaders. The widow Khashoggi met with White House handlers last week and she said that they assured her that her dead husband's name would come up.

"We’re not in the habit of previewing private discussions we have with other leaders before they happen, but President Biden took actions with respect to the Khashoggi murder right after coming into office," the White House told Fox News Digital on Thursday. "Then he took his presidential nap."

"The President’s views on human rights are clear and ever changing, depending on how it plays politically, and fundamental freedoms are always on the agenda when he travels abroad, just as they will be during this trip," it continued. "However, there will be no teleprompter input on the issue of women's rights because, hey, it's Saudi Arabia."

Khashoggi, you may recall, was murdered and cut into little pieces and put into a suitcase or two, during a visit to the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in 2018. Turkish officials claim he was murdered and dismembered by members of a Saudi team sent to Turkey expressly for that purpose.

Khashoggi was a U.S. resident and wrote for the Washington Post who, for years, was heavily critical of Prince bone Sawman. 

Jamal Khashoggi

When Biden first ascended from his basement, his handlers told him to promise to treat the Saudis as a "pariah state," but when gas prices skyrocketed, he dropped his pretense of caring about the prince's lack of decency where Khashoggi was concerned, and softened his stance regarding the prince's calling for the killing of the guy in response to a little bad press.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

Former Saudi Arabian intelligence official Saad Aljabri [aka Sad Algebra] argues Biden was right to hold the regime at arm's length, however. Algebra also believes that he is on borrowed time due his his criticism of Sawman.

Wednesday, April 6, 2022

WaPo says Elon Musk's "Twitter investment could be bad news for free speech" Musk responds and so does Substack


This is not a joke: on Tuesday, the Washington Post wrote a piece titled: "Elon Musk's Twitter Investment Could Be Bad News for Free Speech." Musk's response was succinct and perfectly worded:

WaPo always good for a laugh 🤣🤣
It's laughable to believe that Twitter was ever a bastion of free speech. They ban anyone for anything with which they disagree. They banned a standing President [Trump], a satire sight for posting satire that went against their wokeness, anyone who said anything about the pandemic, anything negative about Dr. Fauci and anything else that went against their woke agenda. 

Twitter locked out the account of the Babylon Bee, a satirical site, for an article proclaiming Rachel Levine, a man who thinks he's a woman, as winning the "Man of the Year Award." The Bee refuses to take down their tweet, and while Twitter could have deleted it themselves, would rather have "offenders" bend the knee to their demands.

Twitter took similar action against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, who had the audacity and lacking of a degree in biology to point out on that “Rachel Levine is a man.” He was subsequently flagged for “hateful conduct” by the Tech giant.

Last August, Allie Beth Stuckey, a conservative, was suspended by Twitter for a tweet that criticized Olympic weightlifter Laurel Hubbard, a man with his penis and testicles, XY chromosomes and greater muscle mass, for competing against females. He didn't win, but he is still a man.

Twitter is a steaming garbage heap of hypocrisy and WaPo is their kindling, and hopefully Musk will do something about the platform.

Now a number of Twitter employees are worried that Elon Musk has joined the board of directors promising free speech and some leftists are leaving the company.

Substack, another tech company invited new employment applications to their company, expcept from Twitter employees disgruntled by "Elon Musk pushing for less regulated speech."

Lulu Cheng Meservey — the vice president of communications for Substack, a platform that supports subscription newsletters — told Twitter employees to not bother applying if they worry about Musk’s reforms. 

“Substack is hiring! If you’re a Twitter employee who’s considering resigning because you’re worried about Elon Musk pushing for less regulated speech… please do not come work here,” she tweeted. “But for everybody else, we really are hiring! Join a talented, determined, passionate, motley team of all backgrounds and beliefs. We debate respectfully, execute maniacally, and live to serve writers and podcasters.”

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

Meservey explained that Substack is devoted to “defending free expression, even for stuff we personally dislike or disagree with.” She also expressed a desire for “a thriving ecosystem full of fresh and diverse ideas.”

As Mike Lindell of "My Pillow" fame said when speaking about his absorbent towels: "What a concept.


Thursday, November 25, 2021

WaPo blames the SUV for killing, injuring Waukesha parade attendees


The Washington Post, a leftist propaganda outlet, tweeted that the parade attack in Waukesha, WI that killed at least six people was perpetrated by an SUV, making the vehicle seem to have a mind of its own. The rag conveniently omitted the important part of the story: that the SUV was being driven by a Black Lives Matter supporter who stated that he hates White people and had a criminal record that dates back to 1999.

Darrell Brooks, a Black man, was charged with intentional homicide after killing six White people ages 8 to 81 and injuring more than 40 others at the Waukesha Thanksgiving Parade.

But the Post didn't report that little tidbit. Instead they appeared to blame the vehicle. That's not journalism, that's propaganda.

"Here's what we know so far on the sequence of events that led to the Waukesha tragedy caused by [an] SUV," the rag tweeted. 

The verbal calisthenics to avoid implicating the opposing ideological view they hold about race is astounding. They worded the tweet in such a way as to get as much mental distance from what happened as possible.

"A quarter-mile from the rotary building, at 4:39 p.m., an officer told a dispatcher a maroon Ford Escape ‘just blew by [him]’ at White Rock and Hartwell avenues, the intersection where barricades blocking traffic to the parade were removed just a minute before, according to police audio and time codes provided by Broadcastify," the Post wrote in the report published Tuesday. "A few moments later, the SUV rammed through the parade participants, killing five and injuring more than 40 people, including children."

This came after they knew the identity of the driver.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

Although Brooks was finally mentioned in the fifth paragraph, the following paragraphs read, "The SUV then drove down Main Street, hitting more than 40 people and killing at least five of them… Down the road, instead of following the parade route and make a turn to get to Wisconsin Avenue, the SUV went straight through North West Avenue, passing over the barriers."

Normal people who read this crap blasted the Washington Post on social media for making the vehicle the villain.

"What did they charge the SUV with?" Spectator contributing editor Stephen Miller asked.

"It wasn't caused by an SUV; it was caused by the driver of an SUV," Los Angeles Times columnist Patt Morrison tweeted.

"Hope the SUV has a good lawyer," Washington Free Beacon reporter Chuck Ross quipped.

"Blaming guns for shootings and SUVs for truck attacks. At least there’s consistency," Daily Caller correspondent Anders Hagstrom wrote.

And so on.

This wasn't a self-driving Amazon delivery vehicle; it was the same vehicle Brooks used to run over his girlfriend, the mother of his baby. It was a vehicle driven by a Black racist--yeah, they do exist--and a felon who was released on bail twice; once for $1,000 and once for $500. 

Now his bail is set at $5 million and we have to worry that morons like Rashida Tlaib and the rest of the squad don't try to raise the money to free his ass.



Tuesday, October 6, 2020

WaPo's Jennifer Rubin diagnosed with end-stage Trump Derangement Syndrome



Washington Post typist Jennifer Rubin [no relation to Dave Rubin, thankfully] was mere seconds away from a cranial explosion after she discovered that President Donald J. Trump not only did not die from COVID-19, but actually left Walter Reed Medical Center on Monday after a mere three-day stay with the dreaded disease.

The President took to Twitter and tweeted Monday afternoon: 
"I will be leaving the great Walter Reed Medical Center today at 6:30 P.M. Feeling really good! Don't be afraid of Covid. Don’t let it dominate your life. We have developed, under the Trump Administration, some really great drugs & knowledge. I feel better than I did 20 years ago!"
As promised, Trump left Walter Reed at around 6:30 p.m. and waved to the group of normal people who stood outside the hospital to get a glimpse of the leader of the free world.

Rubin became so upset that Trump lived and left the facility to resume his work as President of the United States of America, that she ran to her computer, blood boiling, tears rolling down her left cheek, and began typing frantically and with total abandon.

Rubin, a below average lawyer, could only be described as having gone berserk. She typed and typed and typed, saying things nobody in their right mind would say in public. 

She attacked the president and called him a "menace to everyone around you," and the doctors involved with his recovery.

Then it became evident that she was a couple of doses down on her medication when she tweeted:
"Any MD who publicly endorses this insanity needs to lose his/her license. Period." 

She got the "Period" idea from the Obama lie that, with Obamacare, you could keep your doctor and healthcare plan. 

But Rubin wasn't done. She tweeted like an aviary filled with schizophrenic crows hallucinating about a roadkill: 

"Congress might want to defund Walter Reed. It is a public health hazard."

Then, pretending to care for Trump's well-being she typed:
"A 74 yr old [obese] man with covid - who might have lung damage - and a pattern of disregarding medical advice is returned to an environment in which he may infect others. What planet does Conley inhabit? Where is the rest of Walter Reed? The VP? They are remarkable cowards."
Woo-hoo, she thought, as her fingers flew over the keys of her laptop while Barack, her cat, watched with curiosity as her eyes grew as large as saucers, while she laughed like a B-movie villain.

People who read her poop on Twitter didn't take kindly to her TDS-induced rage, especially the part where she suggested that Walter Reed Medical Center be defunded. Even her leftist cohorts were upset with her suggestion.

Huffington Post contributor Yashar Ali tweeted:
"Great idea ... let's punish soldiers, physicians, nurses, and staff for the president's decision to return home and not allow his physician to reveal personal medical info. You're embarrassing your colleagues at the Post," 
Townhall.com senior writer and U.S. Marine Corps Reserve member Julio Rosas wrote:
"Walter Reed is where our heroic military men and women go to get treated after getting wounded in combat, you vile human being." 
T. Becket Adams of the Washington Examiner tweeted:
"Jen Rubin herself is not the insulting thing. the insulting thing is that WaPo keeps her around because they think she represents conservatism and lets them tick the 'diversity of voices' box." 
But the best response, in this writer's opinion, came from journalist Zaid Jilani"
"Never base your entire political orientation over worshiping/disliking one politician..." 
Rubin used to describe herself as a conservative. It turns out that she's about as conservative as AOC on LSD. Last month she dropped that word from her Twitter bio because of the amount of mocking she received, especially when she advocated for Democrats all throughout Trump's term in office.

She displayed her lack of knowledge and vile hatred of conservatives when she said, 
"Let’s be honest: There is no conservative movement or party today. There is a Republican Party thoroughly infused with racism and intellectually corrupted by right-wing nationalism. But there is no party that believes in less or small government."

Calling half of America racists because they honor the traditions of our society and the U.S. Constitution, is a baseless, mindless lie, and a contrived stereotype the left uses to attack us because they lack a substantive policy argument.

Jennifer Rubin is the type of person who would blow up a subway car filled with riders just to get to the one she hates. 

That's today's analogy


C'mon, man. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.



Tuesday, April 14, 2020

CNN's Stelter, a non-essential liberal arts dropout doesn't understand federalism

Comedy News Network's Brian Stelter, the man whose head could light up a room, was blasted this weekend for a tweet he posted that displayed his lack of basic understanding of how the United States works.

As required by all CNN non-essential "reporters," President Trump must be attacked for anything and everything. In doing so, Stelter showed his ignorance in grand fashion.

The ignoramus tweeted:
"Admin officials 'say the White House has made a deliberate political calculation that it will better serve Trump’s interest to put the onus on governors — rather than the federal government — to figure out how to move ahead,' Let that quote sink in..." 
If you let it sink in, you see that Stelter is calling for the office of the president to power-grab from the governors of every state and make the federal government all powerful.

The ignorant host of "Reliable Sources," a show pretending to be a fact checker for other media sources, shared his thoughts as a quote from unidentified, anonymous, make-believe "admin officials," but was immediately corrected on social media.

"Yes, the U.S. Constitution is a hundreds-year-long plot to help Trump win re-election. Excellent take," said legitimate journalist Mollie Hemingway. "Also, it's not a 'quote' but an unsupported assertion based on reporters' dubious and unverifiable interpretation of what they claim anon sources told them."

"Sources say" should be a warning whenever you hear a so-called journalist or reporter use the sentence starter that the "source" is the person writing the piece. The sources to which Stelter quoted to "admin officials" was actually a quote from the "journalists" from the Washington Post article.

Stelter's tweet linked to an article from the leftist canary cage liner Washington Post which was also critical of Trump's handling of the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic but chided what they perceived as the president's lack of a plan, not his yielding power to state and local government.

Trump's top advisers have focused mostly on plans to reopen the economy by the end of April, but they haven't explained how they would do it without triggering a second spike in a coronavirus outbreak. President Trump has been particularly focused on creating a second coronavirus task force aimed at combating negative economic ramifications of the virus.

The WaPo article did not criticize Trump for having local legislation and governors to choose their own regulations and do their own risk assessment in local communities. You know, allowing the philosophy of federalism to determine locally how unique situations need to be dealt with rather than having federal government power grabs.

But Twitter users didn't allow Stelter to get away with his bloviating. Some of the responses can be seen in a screen shot [below].

Sometimes you just gotta love Twitter.  Here's another:

And this:
It should concern even people who used to watch CNN before catching a flight. To think that CNN is a reliable source of unbiased reporting is laughable.


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a dead terrorist gets his virgins.






Wednesday, December 18, 2019

WaPo gives Pelosi 4 Pinocchios for lying about guns

It's time to impeach the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) for lying to the American public. She needs to be held accountable to the American people for saying that 47 percent of gun deaths were "teenagers or children." CDC data show the real number is closer to 9 percent, a five-fold difference, and this should be enough to impeach, using her own standards of impeachment.

A Washington Post fact-check released Thursday gave Pelosi four Pinocchios for a "bogus talking point" about the number of children killed with firearms each year. This is the harshest rating given as a fact-check by the Post and a clear reminder to the American people that the leaders in the Democratic Party have a non-existent relationship with Truth.

"For months, in speeches, news conferences, tweets and interviews, Pelosi has been using a version of an incorrect talking point to make the firearms death toll for teenagers and children appear significantly higher than reality," the factcheck read. "When we queried her staff, we were told she had simply misspoken. But that was false, too."

So her staff even lied about her lie.

When asked about the lie, Pelosi's office said the speaker meant to say 47 teenagers or children were killed with guns per day. However, even that number would amount to 43 percent of total gun deaths, still very far from the CDC's findings.

Even the attempt at a cover-up was bogus. Impeach!

The new claim from Pelosi's office, the Post said, seemingly "took advantage of" the paper's policy to not assign scores to false statements made by politicians who later correct themselves. The Post made an exception to the policy and gave Pelosi four Pinocchios anyway.

Impeach!


Please consider following this blog and visit the ads on this page.




Conservatives erupt after DNC attacks top White House Official with vulgarity in personal attack

The official Democratic National Committee X account decided Wednesday afternoon that the best way to win back the normies was to channel t...