CAIR charged with racketeering and fraud--who'd a thunk?

The un-indicted co-conspirator organization known as CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) is going to stand trial on charges of fraud and cover up for alleged crimes against hundreds of victims, according to a new ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

The original case against CAIR was dismissed by a federal judge but but was then unanimously overturned by the appellate court. Two cases are involved in the suit and have since been consolidated into one. Both involved racketeering, a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) crime.

The lawsuit claims that CAIR National knew that Morris Days, their "Resident Attorney" and "Manager for Civil Rights" at CAIR-Maryland/Virginia chapter in Herndon, Virginia (which is now defunct) was not an attorney and that he failed to provide legal services for clients who came to CAIR for legal representation.

The suit claims that CAIR knew of this fraud and intentionally conspired with Days to prevent their CAIR clients from learning that their legal matters were being mishandled or not handled at all. The complaints also allege that, according to CAIR's internal documents, there were hundreds of victims of the fraud scheme.

The original federal judge ruled that Days and CAIR's Virginia chapter were liable for fraud, but that CAIR National wasn't responsible for his conduct. The appeals court found upon review of the evidence, however, there was a direct relationship between CAIR National and Days.

How surprising coming from such a above-board organization that only wants the best interests of the Muslim community and the United States to be served . . . or not.

David Yerushalmi, senior counsel for the plaintiffs and co-founder of the American Freedom Law Center, said that "CAIR engaged in a massive criminal fraud in which literally hundreds of CAIR clients have been victimized." 

Yerushalmi also represented Pamela Geller in her cases against lawsuits initiated by CAIR against her First Amendment rights. Regarding the current case he added, "In his ruling, Judge Friedman [the original judge] inexplicably ignored material facts that establish CAIR National's liability and then engaged in a transparently disingenuous 'weighing' of the factual evidence he did address . . . We are thankful that the appeals court has rectified the trial court's errors. Now, at long last, our clients will go before a jury and get their day in court."

Anyone who follows the news and refuses to stick their head in the sand, or in other places, knows that CAIR has a long history of Islamist extremism. They have links to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood (as does Barack Ohama), and the U.S. Justice Department labeled CAIR as an "un-indicted co-conspirator" in the Holy Land Foundation trial that revealed Hamas-funding by the Muslim Brotherhood and that CAIR is a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity.

CAIR was officially designated a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates in 2014 and listed by the U.S. Department of Justice as part of the Muslim Brotherhood's covert "Palestine Committee" to support Hamas in the USA.

For more on these morons, check out the Clarion Project Factsheet that explains CAIR in greater detail.

Tweet

Denying deniers

In response to the Obama administration's latest efforts at possibly suing "climate deniers," using the RICO Act, the GOP plans to counter that suit, should it go forward, by suing the administration for being Islamic terrorist deniers. 

For some reason, conservatives believe terrorism is a problem requiring more immediate response than climate change, while the left believes the biggest threat the world faces is man-made climate change.

The Obama administration has stated that 97% of scientists believe in climate change. Conservative lawmakers responded by saying that in the year 1492, approximately 97% of the world's leading scientists believed the earth was flat. 

When Galileo demonstrated that the earth was not the center of the universe, the Church issued him a house arrest in the latter years of his life. The Church, in this case, is the Church of Climate Change (which had to actually change its name from the Church of Global Warming when things got colder). 







Tweet

Democrats and thought crimes

An article Saturday in PJ Media discusses how 20  research scientists and academics have asked our "president" to prosecute global warming skeptics under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. 

Although the RICO act was supposed to be used to go after, well, racketeers and gangsters, liberals have figured out a way to use it to go after everyone they disagree with, such as pro-life groups (aka: anti-killing babies in the womb groups) and now people who think Al Gore and his followers are asshats.

The global warming "feelers" are losing their argument and their desperation has kicked in. They wouldn't be so outspoken if their parents were "pro-choice" (aka: totally down with killing the unborn).

So Democrats in Congress suggested the RICO Act be used to suppress counter opinions from their own. One scumcrumpet congressman actually organized a hunt to drive global warming skeptics from college campuses. 

What ever happened to open debate and freedom of ideas?

Michael Bastach's snarky piece in The Daily Caller writes: "The science of global warming is settled, so settled that 20 climate scientists are asking President Barack Obama to prosecute people who disagree with them on the science behind man-made global warming."

Rather than having substantiated evidence to prove their case, global warming geeks need Obama to fight their "scientific" battles for them. If the President prosecutes, then they must be on the correct side of the debate. Oh wait--they don't want a debate. They simply want to shut up the skeptics. 

These 'Goreonians' claim the reason to prosecute groups that "have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change, as a means to forestall America's response to climate change," is somehow for the good of America, as if America was a planet all unto itself.

Meanwhile it is China that is the world's biggest polluter and India is right up there as well. What's the plan, Obama?

Any so-called scientist who has to ask a so-called president to punish those who disagree with their so-called facts, is not a true scientist, but as PJ Media suggests, "they are the "anti-scientists" who are not only trying to deny people who disagree with them a forum to initiate a debate, but are actively seeking to punish apostates because they disagree with many of the near-religious tenets of global warming advocates."

They are frightened misanthropes hiding in their labs and hating those who actually use the scientific method to prove and disprove data.

So far the global warming crowd has harvested predictive data that is about as accurate as Obama's three-point jump shot.

Tweet