Fox Sports will air LGBTQ ad on Super Bowl but refuses a Pro-Life ad

Life News recently reported that FOX Sports, the carrier of this year's Super Bowl, between the Kansas City Chiefs and San Francisco 49ers will be showing a commercial featuring drag queens and LGBTQ etc., etc. activists, as was originally reported by NBC News.

However, Fox won't approve a pro-life commercial, because apparently, advocating for sparing the lives of the unborn is controversial while men dressing and pretending to be women is honky-dory.

As Life News explained, pro-life advocates with the new Faces of Choice organization said they have been waiting at least six months for an answer from FOX about their ad and have received zilch, nada, in response.

The drag queen ad from Sabra hummus already is stirring up controversy. It features drag queens Kim Chi and Miz Cracker from “RuPaul’s Drag Race.” But don't be fooled; these guys have male junk below their equator.

LGBTQ marketing strategist Bob Witeck celebrated the significance of the ad, telling NBC:

“For queer audiences, it is an art form and an ‘outsiders’ language,” Witek said of drag. “Reaching the Super Bowl means taking our language into every home in the nation and millions around the world.”

If it is an art for to dress in the gender to which you have not been born into biologically, then art has lost its meaning, and true art has lost its beauty.  

Witeck said the Sabra ad, which could reach around 100 million viewers during the Super Bowl, of which at least a thousand or so are gay, queer, lesbian or otherwise confused.

He said that it's indicative of a sea change in the public perception of drag, which he said has been normalized in the mainstream [by forcing it on children at public libraries] for many years. 

But FOX and the mainstream media is afraid to touch ads that promote right to life for all people, including those waiting to be born.

Faces of Choice leaders said they have been trying for more than six months to purchase ad time during the Super Bowl, but FOX Sports has repeatedly ignored them. Their powerful new ad premiered at the March for Life last week, and it featured the stories of more than a dozen people who survived abortions.

Lyric Gillett, the 28-year-old founder of Faces of Choice and producer of the ad, said they have a shortened version ready to air during the big game. She provided FOX Sports with all the paperwork required for the ad, and answered all their legal team's questions. FOX refuses to give her an answer, thus far and the game is in two days as of this posting.

“Every great human rights movement in history has been anchored in the stories and the faces of its victims,” Gillett said. “That’s what we aim to do; we simply want to tell their forgotten stories and there’s no larger mega-phone than the Super Bowl. After months of correspondence with the Fox network, we are asking for a definitive answer immediately.

This week, Faces of Choice and My Faith Votes launched a campaign urging pro-lifers to contact the network and ask for a final decision on the ad.

They asked people to email Fox Corp. SVP, Standards and Practices Barbara De Santis, VP, Commercial Clearance Maryana Dezarlo, SVP, Ad Sales Jim Reeder, and EVP, Corporate General Counsel Claudia Teran. The pro-life organizations also began a petition here.

But it may be too late.

FOX knows that people, no matter what they decide regarding the pro-life ad, will tune into the game because America is a captive audience. Still, I would ask that you follow Gillett's advice and shut off the commercials during the Big Game and instead you can watch the abortion survivors’ stories instead on YouTube. Find the video here.

Abortion survivors pose a vital question to abortion activists through the new ad, “Can you look me in the eye and say I should have been aborted?”

Life News writes: "Ultimately, Faces of Choice leaders hope their stories will break down the myth of 'choice.'"

You can complain to Fox Sports by going to their Facebook page or Twitter.

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings.

Tweet

Former newspaper calls fetal heartbeat "embryonic pulsing'

Checking cell-clump pulsing

One thing you gotta say about the far-Left, they sure know how to play with words--they make the killing of babies in the womb sound like the removal of an annoying cyst.

Several states have passed their own versions of heartbeat bills, each basically prohibiting abortions after a heartbeat is detected, which typically occurs around six weeks into a woman’s pregnancy. Louisiana is the latest state to take action. Gov. John Bel Edwards, the state’s pro-life Democrat governor, a rare breed, expressed his support for the legislation and signed it into law Thursday.

“In 2015, I ran for governor as a pro-life candidate after serving as a pro-life legislator for eight years,” Edwards said in a statement released Wednesday. “As governor, I have been true to my word and my beliefs on this issue.”

“I know there are many who feel just as strongly as I do on abortion and disagree with me — and I respect their opinions,” he continued. [I don't respect the opinions of anyone who would kill a baby in the womb--it's immoral, bordering on evil.] “As I prepare to sign this bill, I call on the overwhelming bipartisan majority of legislators who voted for it to join me in continuing to build a better Louisiana that cares for the least among us and provides more opportunity for everyone.”

The New York Times (NYT) a former newspaper, decided to use phrases that obviously dehumanizes the unborn, because everyone knows what abortion is, and everyone knows that a human life is taken in the process. That's why they talk about "terminating a pregnancy" rather than killing an unborn baby. Another way to terminate a pregnancy is to give birth.

Anyway, The Times referred to an unborn child’s heartbeat as “embryonic pulsing”:

A State House vote on Wednesday moved the abortion measure to the governor’s desk, after lawmakers rejected a series of amendments including an exception for cases of rape or incest [which still doesn't justify the killing of an unborn baby]. The measure would require an ultrasound test for any woman seeking to terminate a pregnancy, and forbid abortion if the test detects embryonic pulsing — which can occur before many women know they are pregnant. Abortions would be permitted only to save a woman’s life or to prevent a “serious risk” to her health.

LifeNews noted:

Rather than say the word “heartbeat,” The New York Times used the words “the pulsing of what becomes the fetus’s heart.” It also described the legislation as a “so-called fetal heartbeat bill” – as if it is questionable whether the unborn baby actually has a heart or a heartbeat.

The Times is obviously not the only outlet that has tried to discount the unique human being inside the mother's womb and struggled to find ways of expressing this false notion.

ABC opinion hack and science-denier, Steve Osunsami, described those who supported Louisiana’s pro-life law as people who “believe that a fetal heartbeat can be detected.”

Well Steve, ultrasound detecting an absence of cardiac activity [aka pulsations], even in very small embryos, indicates pregnancy demise regardless of the size of the embryo, so you and other leftists may not call it a heartbeat, but without it, there can be no life inside the mother's uterus.

And yes, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the lady with the fetus/embryo/unborn child in her womb is not the superintendent of the life inside her--she's the mother.

And furthermore Steve Osunsami,, an unborn child’s detectable heartbeat is not a matter of opinion, which makes you sound like a deadbeat guy on an abortion mission. Maybe you got a woman pregnant and it's inconvenient for you to let her go through with it. I'm not saying that's true, but there is no evidence to say that it is not the case.

I'm just using Robert Mueller's line of thinking.



Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey 
Thanks.




Tweet

Gutless RINO Kasich vetoes fetal heartbeat abortion bill

Possibly the most punchable face in politics, a moral coward, weasel scumwafer, Ohio Gov. John Kasich did as I predicted. Had his mother decided what he agrees to, Kasich would not have been born and perhaps an actual conservative with a set of real morals would have gone ahead with allowing the bill to become law.

Kasich's cowardly amoral veto came on Friday. It would have banned abortions on unborn babies with detectable heartbeats.

According to LifeNews, Gov. Kasich vetoed the bill arguing that it would not survive in a court challenge, without even testing whether or not it was the case. He did the same in 2016 for similar fake reasons, but that was before Justice Kavanaugh sat on the Supreme Court.

Kasich, putting money ahead of the lives of the unborn, also argued that the legal challenges would cost taxpayers too much money, which is bull crap.

"As governor I have worked hard to strengthen Ohio’s protections for the sanctity of human life, and I have a deep respect for my fellow members of the pro-life community and their ongoing efforts in defense of unborn life," he said in a statement. "However, the central provision of Sub. H.B. 258, that an abortion cannot be performed if a heartbeat has been detected in the unborn child, is contrary to the Supreme Court of the United States’ current rulings on abortion."

Current rulings can become more current, especially with our current SCOTUS. He knows that but he isn't a real conservative.

"As the losing party, the state of Ohio will be forced to pay hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to cover the legal fees for the pro-choice activists’ lawyers," Kasich said, knowing what a loser he is.

State House Bill 258 passed in a 58-35 vote and sailed through the State Senate. Most abortions in Ohio would be effectively banned had Kasich signed it into law, but he is a gutless coward.

"The controversial legislation would ban most abortions in Ohio if it becomes law," reported LifeNews. in November. "An unborn baby’s heart begins beating around six weeks, though the latest research suggests that it may begin as early as 16 days after conception." 

Abortion providers could also be charged with a felony for breaking the law by killing a baby with a detected heartbeat. The reason for that is due to the fact that it is murder to kill a human being and what is a fetus, if not a human being?

Proponents of the new law said the potential legal challenges should not matter.

"The point is: it’s time. It doesn’t matter if the governor is with us or against us," said state Rep. Christina Hagan, a sponsor of the bill. "Motherhood isn’t easy but it’s necessary."

Other pro-life lawmakers (mostly female) have pushed similar arguments.

"(Abortion) is not a constitutional right," said Rep. Candice Keller (R-Middletown). "If you don’t know that, you need to read the Constitution."

"Today, let us stand up for the most innocent among us: the unborn," Rep. Kristina Roegner said.

Kasich doesn't agree--it costs too much. And this clown calls himself a conservative.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.

Tweet