Iran: Jewish man executed for killing Muslim in self-defense

Arvin Nathaniel Ghahremani, 20, was hanged in an Iranian jail on Monday morning. He was convicted of a murder committed in self-defense against a Muslim man, as per a report by a human rights organization. 

Apparently, if you're Jewish in Iran you cannot defend yourself against a Muslim. You must either run away if you can, or allow fate to run its course.

Iran Human Rights is a group that monitors human rights abuses by the Islamic regime and they track executions. They reported about the event, saying that Ghahremani was hanged at Kermanshah Central Prison.

In 2022, Iranian police arrested a teenager named Ghahremani, who was 18 at that time, because he was involved in a deadly fight with a Muslim man in Kermanshah.

Ghahremani and those who support him argue that he acted in self-defense. They say the man attacked him with a knife.

Court records show that the fight happened at a gym where Ghahremani was exercising. He was confronted by seven Muslim men, one of whom reportedly owed him money.

One of the attackers, Amir Shokri, stabbed Ghahremani, but Ghahremani took the knife and ended up killing Shokri during the fight.

Still, the local court decided Ghahremani was guilty of murder and sentenced him to death.

There was a chance for Ghahremani to avoid the death penalty through a quirk in Iran's Sharia law. If his family could get the Shokri family to forgive him, the sentence could be dropped.

This May, they tried to delay his execution by offering money to the Shokri family to forgive the crime.

But the Shokri family turned down the offers, and all attempts to get a new trial didn't succeed.

“Jews in the US and other countries raised funds amounting to over $1.5 million, including an offer of an apartment and the building of a mosque in the name of the dead Muslim man,” Beni Sabti, an Iranian-born scholar at the Institute for National Security Studies in Israel told The Jerusalem Post in May.

“It seems that they did not agree.”

Tweet

Chicago Police clueless regarding motive of Muslim gunman shouting "Allahu Akbar" as he shot Orthodox Jew

Sidi Mohamed Abdallah, 22,  shot a 39-year-old Orthodox Jewish man as he walked to synagogue on Shabbat leaving police baffled as to what his motive could be.

Abdallah went into a Jewish neighborhood in Chicago and shot a visibly Jewish man who was on his way to synagogue, and then he got into a gun fight with police as he mysteriously shouted "Allahu Akbar," leaving the cops to scratch their collective heads wondering why.

The shooter, a Muslim man, during the gun battle, shouted the magic words but still got wounded as police shot him. Lucky for Abdallah, police after hearing his war shout did not charge him with a hate crime, but only because they had no idea why he shot at an Orthodox Jewish person on his way to synagogue on the Jewish Sabbath.

“The first thing is we have to find out who’s committing the crime. Secondly, we have to find out the motive for the crime,” Chicago police super-duper-intendent Larry Snelling said during a press conference Monday afternoon. “We don’t just go in and assume that everything is a hate crime, but what we don’t do is rule out the possibility that it could be.”

But why simply call it a hate crime when you can call it terrorism? After all, if shooting at cops while shouting "Allahu Akbar" [Allah is greater] to display the superiority of the shooter's deity to those of the, you know, Jews, isn't the "T" word, then what is?

There are reports that the shooter is also an illegal alien who crossed the border but the cops refuse to confirm this in their reports, just like they're unwilling to confirm whether he shouted the magic words about Allah.

Yes, after refusing to release Mohamed’s identity for three days, and the Jewish identity of the victim, the CPD is refusing to release whether he shouted, “Allahu Akbar.”

Tweet

Google deletes offensive definition for "Jew"

Neo Nazi's newest fan

Google had to repair the search results for the word "Jew" from: to "bargain with someone in a miserly or petty way" to: "a member of the people and cultural community whose traditional religion is Judaism and who trace their origins through the ancient Hebrew people of Israel to Abraham."

Can you see the difference? The first one is a disgusting anti-Semitic trope while the second one is an actual definition. Google added the "offensive" label in all capital letters to their offensive definition, and wrote that the origins were in 19th Century stereotypes "associating Jewish people with trading and moneylending."

Google had the original 'definition' up until about 1 p.m. on Tuesday using a verb to define 'Jew' and credited Oxford Languages as the source for the anti-Semitic definition. It also presented the word in various "tenses" such as "jewed" and "jewing."

Google changed the definition after online users pointed out their offensive error.

Integrity First for America Executive Director Amy Spitalnick tweeted:

"So, if you Google the word 'Jew' - this is what comes up as the definition. 'Bargain with someone in a miserly or petty way.' Seriously, @Google?" 

She added in another tweet:

"I assume Google will fix this — but the real question is how something like this could happen in the first place. At the @WhiteHouse antisemitism roundtable this month, some of us raised how tech companies allow antisemitism to run rampant. This is an almost comical example."

The new accepted cocktail conversation

Google SearchLiason responded:

"Our apologies. Google licenses definitions from third-party dictionary experts. We only display offensive definitions by default if they are the main meaning of a term. As this is not the case here, we have blocked this & passed along feedback to the partner for further review."

Google confirmed that the derogatory definition was removed from its search engine results by 1:21 p.m. ET on Tuesday.

An Anti-Defamation League (ADL) spokesperson told CBS News that "there is no excuse" for "an obviously antisemitic result" to be displayed first on Google.

"We are thankful that Google removed the offensive definition of the word Jew from its initial dictionary definition today after ADL and the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported it," the spokesperson told CBS News.

It should have never happened on the first place.

Tweet

Muslim man arrested: suspect in anti-Semitic attack in New York's Time Square

A man was arrested and his cohorts are being sought involving an obviously anti-Semitic attack on a Jewish man in Times Square in Manhattan. In spite of this being an apparent anti-Semitic crime, some politicians are uncharacteristically paying attention. The crime á la mode has been anti-Asian assaults so it's interesting that politicians are giving anti-Semitic crime a second look in spite of it being disproportionately the highest hate crime in the nation. And police are investigating this attack as such.

The attack occurred on Thursday and was caught on video and shared on social media. It came following pro-Israel and pro-Hamasshole demonstrations in midtown Manhattan over the conflict in Gaza. 

The cease fire, or 'intermission' came a few hours later but 26 arrests were made.

The 29-year-old man was attacked for being Jewish a short time after the demonstrations and was taken to a hospital where he was in stable condition, Sergeant Jessica McRorie, a police spokeswoman, said. The victim's name was not released in concern the Hamasshole supporters would track him and his family down for being Jewish and kill them.

"The victim was approached by a group of five or six males who knocked him to the ground, assaulted him while making anti-Semitic statements," McRorie said by phone. "They punched, kicked, pepper-sprayed and hit him with some crutches during the assault."

They are what is known as crap weasel cowards.

The man who was arrested was identified as Waseem Awawdeh, who police said used a crutch in the early evening assault. It's possible Awawdeh stole the crutch from a disabled person but he refused to say.

Awawdeh arrested

He faces charges of second-degree hate crime assault, a second-degree gang assault, menacing and criminal possession of a weapon. If convicted, he faces up to three hours in custody under New York City's no bail, no problem rules.

A video of the incident showed a person striking a man on the ground with a crutch and fleeing as other attackers also did. The victim got up about a minute later and tried to pursue his attackers but was restrained by police. You gotta give him credit, though.

The New York Police Department's Hate Crime Task Force said it was investigating the assault as they search for reasons why anyone would attack a lone Jewish man on the streets of New York. Hmm.

New York Governor Andrew "Hi Toots" Cuomo said in a statement that he was [reluctantly] dispatching the State Police Hate Crimes Task Force to assist.

Cuomo and several other useless officials, including Mayor Bill de Blasio and U.S. Representative Jerry Nadler, whose district includes the Times Square restaurants area, condemned what Cuomo called "anti-Semitic violent gang harassment and intimidation." 

Meanwhile back at the front, the cease fire has held longer than a cab ride from Brooklyn to the Bronx, so maybe it'll last a little while longer. But it ain't over, folks.

 wrote. “I have been struck since my first day on the campaign trail back in 2018 by the overwhelming whiteness and maleness of Chicago media outlets, editorial boards, the political press corps, and yes, the City Hall press corps specifically.”

“If I as the black woman mayor, the first-ever, don’t challenge us, the collective us, to do better, to really make sure that in every institution it reflects the diversity, nuance, and texture, then shame on me,” Lightfoot continued.

“This isn’t my job. It shouldn’t be,” she wrote. “I don’t have time for it. But as with so many festering problems, it has only gotten worse with time. So here I am, like so many other Black women before me, having to call your attention to this problem.”

Lightfoot went further, taking to Twitter early Thursday morning to defend her policy in a series of posts.

“I ran to break up the status quo that was failing so many,” Lightfoot tweeted. “That isn’t just in City Hall. It’s a shame that in 2021, the City Hall press corps is overwhelmingly White in a city where more than half of the city identifies as Black, Latino, AAPI, or Native American.”

“Diversity and inclusion is imperative across all institutions including media. In order to progress we must change,” she continued. “This is exactly why I’m being intentional about prioritizing media requests from POC reporters on the occasion of the two-year anniversary of my inauguration as mayor of this great city.”

Critics blasted Lightfoot’s decision from all sides Wednesday. Beyond the journalists who noted that they were shut out by the policy limiting interviews, Lightfoot faced criticism from a Latino news organization, which refused to interview the mayor after she refused to lift the moratorium on white journalists, per Fox News.

She also faced blowback on Twitter, where racial justice advocates suggested that Lightfoot was likely using the policy to distract from her inability to handle questions of violence. “Lori Lightfoot presided over an enormous increase in homicides, almost all of them in African American or Latino communities, and she’s hoping these PR stunts get liberal America to give her a pass for failing to save people’s lives,” journalist Zaid Jilani pointed out.

Indeed, on the same day that the mayor’s office announced the policy favoring “black and brown” reporters, Lightfoot aides announced that “a compromise plan to make past police disciplinary records available to the public,” essentially turning down a request from Chicago’s racial justice activists to expand police transparency.

  You haven’t highlighted anything yet

When you select text while you’re reading, it'll appear here.

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Determines Who Interviews Her Based On Race, Local Reporters Claim
By
Ryan Saavedra
The Daily Wire
3 min
View Original




Local media reporters in Chicago are alleging that Democrat Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot is selecting who gets to do one-on-one interviews with her based on the race of the interviewer.

NBC 5 political reporter Mary Ann Ahern made the initial allegation on Twitter, writing: “As ⁦ @chicagosmayor ⁩ reaches her two year midway point as mayor, her spokeswoman says Lightfoot is granting 1 on 1 interviews – only to Black or Brown journalists.”

Chicago PBS news anchor Paris Schultz responded: “I was told the same thing.”


I was told the same thing.

— Paris Schutz (@paschutz)

Chicago PBS political reporter said that she could “confirm” what Ahern was alleging.


I can confirm, alderman

— Heather Cherone (@HeatherCherone) May 18, 2021

Lightfoot’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Daily Wire or Fox News.

Australian political commentator Rita Panahi responded to the allegations by writing on Twitter: “More ‘anti-racist’ racism. Almost amusing how regressive race-obsession is celebrated among the Left.”


More "anti-racist" racism. Almost amusing how regressive race-obsession is celebrated among the Left. https://t.co/VtzpQyfklg

— Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) May 19, 2021

“Racism in the name of wokeism is still racism,” another commentator said. Another added, “So wouldn’t that make her a racist?”

Progressive writer Zaid Jilani wrote: “Is she going to do some kinda DNA test to assure she upholds this rule?”


Is she going to do some kinda DNA test to assure she upholds this rule? https://t.co/9d7rXZTnCV

— Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) May 19, 2021

“It is unclear when such a practice was enacted and if it only applies to local reporters, particularly after her MSNBC appearance with Stephanie Ruhle on Monday,” Fox News reported. “During her MSNBC interview, Lightfoot told Ruhle she would ‘encourage’ Chicago residents to continue wearing masks despite the new CDC guidance allowing those with the coronavirus vaccine to go without them.”

“I know for me personally, I’m going to continue to wear a mask in public and I’m going to encourage others to do so,” Lightfoot told Ruhle. “We’ve got to make sure that people are continuing to follow the public health guidance that has gotten us this far, and masks, I think, are a big and important part of that.”

Lightfoot said on Tuesday afternoon that her decision to continue to encourage people to wear masks was not based on distrust of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

“But I think their guidance last week regarding masks has people confused…We need clarification,” Lightfoot said. “We still have a long way to go to hit the critical mass (of vaccinations) or herd immunity. I don’t want people to have false confidence.”

“To say, ‘If you’re vaccinated, you don’t have to wear a mask,’ that’s great. But what about all of the other people who are out there that aren’t vaccinated?” Lightfoot added. “There’s no way to know that. So I think for the time being, most people are gonna continue to wear masks outside of their homes.”

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Determines Who Interviews Her Based On Race, Local Reporters Claim

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Even teen doesn't get Islam: stabs Jewish teacher

The Gharqad Tree

Come, said the stone,

O Muslim, servant of Allah,

come, there is a Jew hiding behind me,

come and kill him.

Come, said the tree,

O Abdullah, servant of the Lord,

come, there is a Jew crouching behind me,

come and strike off his head. --Sahih Muslim 41:6985 

France -- a Muslim teenager, who obviously knows nothing about Islam, slashed a Jewish teach in southern France Monday. The kid invoked the Islamic State and also said that he also planned to go after police.

The 15-year-old Turkish Kurd and misinterpretor of Islam was nabbed soon after he attacked the teacher in an outdoor attack in Marseille, Brice Robin, the prosecutor said. The Muslim teen, who knew little about the religion of peace, invoked Allah and ISIS and said upon capture that "the Muslims of France dishonor Islam and the French army protects Jews."

How dare the French army protect Jews--how un-Islamic.

The cowardly kid ambushed the Jewish teacher from behind, slashing his shoulder, and then chased him as he tried to flee. But Allah was on the Jewish teacher's side as he did not suffer fatal injuries and the teen was apprehended.

This is the second knife attack that comes a few days after a man went after Paris police with a butcher knife and was sent to Paradise. There he will be receiving: "Unending, and unforbidden, exalted beds, and maidens incomparable. We have formed them in a distinctive fashion and made them virgins, loving companions matched in age, for the sake of those of the right hand" (Qur'an 56:33).

Both of these knife assaults came shortly after the first anniversary of the Charlie Hebdo newspaper attack and the kosher supermarket attack killing 17 people.

But not to be forgotten, two Christian churches were burned. There was also a boar's head and racist inscriptions found at the main mosque in Perpignan, France, which will probably used to exemplify moral equivalence to the attempted murders.

If only those jihadist radicals knew how tolerant Islam is, they might not be so quick to want to kill Jews, Christians and other non-believers. Instead, they think the Qur'an instructs them to be intolerant and aggressive toward them.

Here's a bit of Islamic love for your enjoyment:

"The curse of Allah is on disbelievers" (2:89)
"Allah is an enemy to the disbelievers: (2:98)
"Give us victory over the disbelieving folk" (2:286)
And finally: "Those who disbelieve in the Qur'an, for whatever reason, are cursed by Allah, the angels, and men combined. So every good Muslim must join Allah and the angels in cursing nonbelievers" (2:161)

And that's just a small part of Sura 2.



Tweet

U of M Protest D' Jour

The University of Minnesota (Duh-UM) has experienced protests in the past few weeks over campus diversity, Fox News and AP have reported. The school announced that they will be somewhat less vague when sending out alerts dealing with descriptions of suspects of serious crimes.

Hands up don't think

Pamela Wheelock, Duh-UM's vice principal said told The Star Tribune that the suspect's description will only be given in cases with "sufficient detail that would help identify a specific individual or group," or, in other words, we really don't want to catch the person unless he or she has killed someone, or whatever else we deem as "serious."

"Unless we have a sufficiency of information, we're not actually going to use any suspect information." Whatever that "sufficiency of information" entails is a mystery.

So if say, a man with a beard, dyed with henna, and who looks Middle Eastern, robs the campus deli, the report of his description might be: "A person, approximately 5 feet 10 inches tall, wearing black shoes and a brown jacket, was seen running across the quad." 

Of course, if the man wore a Jewish skull cap, known as a yarmulke, instead of the henna-dyed beard, the description might be: "A light-skin Jew, with a long, dark beard, approximately 5 feet 10 inches tall, wearing a black skull cap, brown woolen jacket, white shirt, black pants with strings from a Jewish prayer shawl sticking out from his beltline, black-rimmed eyeglasses, has an annoying Jewish accent, robbed the campus deli. He was last seen running in an unathletic-like trot across the campus quad. 

Protest d' jour

In a letter to his faculty, staff and students, Eric Kaler, President of Duh-UM, said that the routine use of a person's race in describing miscreants "may unintentionally reinforce stereotypes of black men and other people of color, as criminals and threats."

It sounds like Kaler is a racist since he assumes that future perpetrators of crimes will turn out to be blacks or people of color. This is typical of progressives--they have always had lower expectations of these groups. If it's a problem on his campus, i.e., that most of the crimes are committed by minorities, then not identifying them only makes things worse.

The biggest targets of hatred on American campuses are not with blacks, nor with Muslim students, it's with the Jewish students. The same is true off-campus as well, but the left seems to turn a blind eye. Jed Lipinski discusses this issue in The Times-Picayune.

Most Jews in the USA tend to vote Democratic, being under the false assumption that the left cares about their safety and welfare. 

They fail to see the analogous lack of caring with Israel and how Obama seems to have more in common with Islam than the Jews.

Tweet

If it Looks Like a Duck

Why are we so afraid of the truth when there is more danger avoiding it than confronting it? 

Fox News reports "A Frenchman arrested over killings at a Belgian Jewish museum had traveled to Syria and claimed responsibility for killing visitors of the museum, prosecutors said.

Fox refers to jihadists as "European radicals" but fails to mention how they really self-identify: Muslim jihadists.

Like the American pussy cat-loving suicide bomber, Moner Mohammad Abu-Salha, these people see their mission as doing Allah's work. It's jihad, stupid. 

To call these orthodox Muslims extremists, is like calling orthodox Jews, or religious Christians extremists.

The Koran, the Islamic scripture that often serves as a war manual, describes the Jews as prophet killers (2:61, 2;87, 2:91, 3:21, 3:112, 3:181 and so on) and has nothing nice to say about Christians either.

It's time we started describing the situation for what it really is: hatred for the non-believers and a drive to make the world their caliphate.

 

Tweet

Non Kosher Flying

"This is Delta 307 to tower."

Fly the Jew-free skies

"This is tower, go, Delta 307."
"Tower, Delta 307 is in the glidepath and ready for approach."
"Delta 307, this is tower. Do you have any Jews or Bibles on board."
"That's a negative."
"Then, Inshallah,  you are free to approach.  Allahu Akbar."

Can you believe this? Delta Airlines struck a deal with Saudi Arabian Airlines (SAA) in January of this year, and not much was known about it at the time, until now. Shariah (or Islamic law) that governs Saudi Arabia (and slowly creeping into the USA, Canada, and many western countries), prohibits people from entering the country without a sponsor.  A women cannot enter the country without being modestly covered and have a chaperone meet her at the airport, or she can be beaten, sexually assaulted by a religious Saudi man, and raped due to her deserving it because she failed to cover herself properly and showed a sexually stimulating wrist or nostril. 

Jews, Israelis, and even people with Jewish sounding names are not going to be permitted to land in Saudi Arabia. Forget about even asking for a Kosher meal in flight. But even if you're a Christian, leave your Bible at home lest it get shredded or destroyed, along with your cross or any other religious, non-Muslim articles. I wonder how they are going to "weed out" American Jews at American airports. Delta may have a problem enforcing anything like that on American soil where we still have rights, although Obama is working feverishly to erode them with "hate speech" legislation. Anti-Semitic legislation is the next logical step, knowing Obama's feelings about Jews and Israel.


In Saudi Arabia, anyone disrespecting the koran will be summarily beheaded. (I'm in trouble just for the fact that I didn't capitalize the word 'koran'.) This is a country with Wahhabi Sharia, an extremely orthodox take on Islam's superiority over the rest of the world, and a clear call to jihad for the believers.  Learn more about Sharia and see how you feel about their religious beliefs, which is actually less religious and a more politically oriented dogma.


It's disgusting what some companies will do for money--or what presidents will do for votes. Delta should be ashamed, and Obama should be ousted. I know Obama has nothing to do with this, but I always find myself saying something about him, every chance I get.

Christmas presents

So I am definitely going to boycott Delta, because today it's Jews, women, Christians, and non-believers, but tomorrow it may be you. Oh, you say it is you? Okay, so boycott Delta and let's hope that the next American planes to fly there will be USAF First Strike bombers.



Tweet