Fake AI Rabbis Spreading Anti-Semitism on Instagram: Report

Fake AI Rabbi

An AI-generated Instagram account portraying an Orthodox-looking rabbi is pushing anti-Semitic conspiracy theories to its more than 1.4 million low-information followers. It is not the only one. A study published this week about anti-Semitic content on the social media platform has found precisely this pattern. 

An account called “Rabbi Goldman” “uses fake, AI-created authority figures to spread hate” in “a troubling and growing tactic,” according to the report published on Wednesday by the Combat Antisemitism Movement.

The 12-page report, titled “Engineered Exposure: How Antisemitic Content Is Pushed and Amplified to Millions Across Instagram,” documents 100 posts that researchers described as anti-Semitic. These were pushed directly to Instagram accounts over a 96-hour period from March 19 to 22 of this year.

These posts, actively suggested by the platform’s recommendation systems, generated more than 5.3 million likes and 3.8 million shares, with an estimated reach of 150 to 280 million users, according to the report, indicating the enormous extent to the level of gullibility that exists in this country.

The Combat Antisemitism Movement defined anti-Semitic posts as ones that invoke conspiracy theories, such as Jews controlling the media or manipulating global conflicts, and posts that claim Jews, often referred to as “Zionists,” are linked to demonic forces or satanic imagery. 

All of these motifs have been used historically to justify anti-Semitic violence, much like certain religious scripture in a religion that attempts to pass itself off as a religion of peace,

The report raises particular concern around the creation of “closed content environments,” in which users are repeatedly fed similar anti-Semitic themes, with little or no countervailing content. “This type of algorithmic clustering reaffirms dangerous beliefs, contributing to a process of radicalization that can have lethal real-world consequences,” the report states. Researchers identified a dozen AI-generated “rabbis” with a combined following of 2.1 million Instagram users, all of which promote classic antisemitic stereotypes.

The “Rabbi Goldman” account features many of these, including one video in which the “rabbi,” wearing a tuxedo and seemingly seated in a luxury airplane, claims that Jews utilize empty private jets to evade taxes. Anyone who actually believes this garbage is either a moron or an anti-Semite or both, since most anti-Semites are not very bright.

The community note attached to the clip reads, “This is an AI generated rabbi who is trying to scam you by selling a fake 9$ get rich handbook. This account is ran by scammers based in south India.”

Meta, which is the parent company of Instagram as well as Facebook and WhatsApp, did not respond to a request for comment from Jewish Insider about the report’s findings, but as you may know, Meta has its own problems of late.

“Simply put, this is evidence of a broad systemic failure on the part of Instagram and Meta,” Sacha Roytman, the CEO of the Combat Antisemitism Movement, said in a statement. “When a platform actively recommends content that dehumanizes Jews to mass audiences, we are no longer talking about a simple oversight or a mistake in the algorithmic design. We are talking about infrastructure that normalizes hatred at scale that must be addressed immediately.”

“The Combat Antisemitism Movement is calling on Meta to go beyond basic enforcement and take real responsibility. What’s been uncovered here must be taken seriously. This isn’t a fringe problem. Rather, it points to a broader, systemic issue with global reach, shaping how millions of people encounter and engage with antisemitic ideas in 2026,” the report states.

Last year, Meta received pushback from Jewish leaders when it introduced a new community-driven fact-checking system, ending its third-party fact-checking program and replacing it with a system modeled after the community notes feature on Elon Musk’s X. Some Jewish leaders expressed concern that the move would “open the floodgates to content” that could target Jewish communities and individuals, and called the decision a “step back” in the fight against rising antisemitism.

The dangerous implications of social media have extended beyond the Jewish community. On Wednesday a jury in Los Angeles ruled that Meta, as well as Google, are liable for creating addictive products that caused a teenager’s depression and anxiety. The verdict marks the first time juries have decided that tech companies are at least partially liable for distress both online and offline.

Hey guys--thanks for following Brain Flushings. Consider subscribing and perhaps supporting my work by checking out the sponsors on this page. It really helps me. You can even Buy Me A Coffee if you want to show your appreciation, but really, there's  no pressure.

Tweet

Survey: Israeli Schools Failing Kids on English Fluency, Leaving Them Woefully Unprepared for the 'Real World'

Ah, the joys of modern education, where your tax dollars fund a system that treats essential skills like optional extras. A fresh survey, from Novakid drops the mic: Israeli elementary schools are delivering a pathetic 12% of the English exposure kids actually need to hit fluency. That's right, your little ones are being set up to stumble through the global stage like deer in headlights, all because the bureaucrats couldn't be bothered to prioritize. [H/T The Jerusalem Post.]

Picture this: It's September 1, 2025, and kids are filing into classrooms in Mevaseret Zion, backpacks slung over shoulders, dreams of conquering the world intact. Fast-forward a few months, and 73% of Israeli parents are telling Novakid's pollsters that their schools aren't prepping the little guys one iota for real-world chit-chat in English. Conducted with about 500 parents of 6- to 12-year-olds, this isn't some fringe gripe; it's a full-throated indictment of a curriculum that's more virtue-signaling than skill-building.

Nearly 70% of these parents aren't betting a shekel on their kids' ability to string together a coherent sentence in Shakespeare’s tongue, even after years of ESL starting as early as grades 1-3. English is compulsory from grade 3 on, but time crunches mean teachers are rationing it like wartime rations. 

Novakid crunches the numbers: 71% of kids kick off lessons by end of third grade, yet 57% get a measly three hours a week. Only 15% score four or more. No wonder the rug rats freeze up outside the classroom, it's like handing someone a bicycle with three flat tires and calling it transportation.

Science backs this farce: Fluency demands about 25 hours weekly of immersion, roughly 30% of a kid's waking hours. Schools cough up three measly hours. 

Congrats, parents, you're on the hook for the other 22. If junior's logging 30 school hours, that means 40% of your home life turns into an English-only boot camp. Bon appétit, family harmony.

And the kicker? Only 28% of parents rate their kid's ESL setup as "good" or "excellent." Worse, 57% say the teaching quality's tanked over the last three years. Shocker: When the ivory tower cracks, trust evaporates faster than a politician's promises.

Enter the ESL tutor boom, because when Big Education fumbles, savvy moms and dads don't sit idle. Novakid's data shows 28% already shelling out for private lessons after hours, with 42% plotting to join the party soon. Preference? Old-school in-person with native speakers edges out the techies, but 30% are all-in on digital platforms that don't require schlepping across town."Parents in Israel, as around the world, recognize that strong English skills empower their children and boost their future prospects."

Spot on. In a world where Mandarin's rising and borders are blurring, saddling kids with broken English is educational malpractice. But hey, at least the system's consistently failing forward, one underfunded hour at a time.

Cue the Novakid rep: "When the school system does not deliver, parents refuse to compromise. Increasingly, they turn to digital alternatives, which have become more advanced in recent years."

Novakid, for the uninitiated, is a global ESL powerhouse for ages 2-14, with over a million students in 50+ countries. Israel is their third-biggest playground. Launched in 2017, it's all gamified AI wizardry, VR immersion, and natural language smarts tailored to each squirt. No cookie-cutter drudgery here; it's fluency engineering and it works.

Bottom line: If Israel's schools can't hack basic bilingual basics, no wonder parents are voting with their wallets. Time for the ed establishment to wake up, or watch the next generation outsource their futures to apps and tutors.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Tweet

Bill Gates’ Latest Scheme: Embalming Newborns for AI Organ Harvesting? You Can’t Make This Up!

Hold onto your hats, folks, because this one may make you sick. 

Billionaire Bill Gates, the guy who's never met an abortion he didn't want to fund, is back with a project so ghoulish it sounds like it was cooked up in a sci-fi horror flick. According to a bombshell report from Modernity News, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is bankrolling a scheme to embalm dead newborn babies and harvest their organs and tissues for artificial intelligence research, because Gates relates better to machines than he does to humans.

This isn't just creepy; it's a five-alarm ethical dumpster fire. The plan is to take infants who've passed away in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), embalm them with some fancy plastic goop called plastination, and then slice and dice their tiny bodies to train AI for forensic and surveillance tech.  Who wakes up and thinks, "Let's turn deceased babies into lab props for Skynet?"

The Modernity News report: "The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is funding a gruesome study that involves embalming dead babies with plastic to harvest their tissues for AI forensics and surveillance." Gruesome doesn’t even begin to cover it. They're talking about babies, those precious, vulnerable lives lost too soon, being treated like spare parts for Gates' next big tech fetish. 

What a freaking ghoul!

Now, let's talk about the setting: NICUs, where premature and critically ill newborns fight for their lives, and sadly, many don't make it. These are the most fragile among us, and instead of dignity, this project allegedly has their bodies "sliced into sections and preserved for analysis," per the report. Pro-life folks are already sounding the alarm, and who can blame them? This smells like commodifying human life, even after death. Where’s the respect? Where’s the humanity?

If you like my blog and want to Buy Me A Coffee, I wouldn't stop you--it supports my work and I really appreciate it. But no pressure.

The Gates Foundation’s track record is the same outfit that's been pouring cash into abortion initiatives for years, so it isn't exactly a shock they’d be tied to something this morally murky. What's shocking is the stone-cold silence on consent. Are grieving parents even being told what’s happening to their babies? Or are they just left in the dark while their loved ones are carved up for AI experiments? No answers from Gates' camp, by the way, just crickets.

Tweet

New gov't report admits climate change ain't so bad

"Martha, do you really think global warming is a threat?"

Donald Trump is once again the President-elect and already things they are a changin' in the country faster than Al Sharpton cries "racist." So it stands to reason that the climate activists are a bit worried while we all know the climate is changing, it isn't the emergency it had been labeled.

A report required by the U.S. government per the 2022 Global Catastrophic Risk Management Act has given us an assessment of the various risks humanity faces and climate change was like a teaspoon of water in the ocean. Actually less so, the issue didn't get mentioned.

Global catastrophic and existential risks are dangers that could potentially destroy or severely damage human society. It's important to tackle these issues to make sure humans can continue to live and thrive in the future. 

Because these risks are so serious, in 2022, Congress passed a law called the Global Catastrophic Risk Management Act. This law says that the Secretary of Homeland Security and the head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) need to work together to figure out what these big risks are and how bad they might be. The Science and Technology Directorate of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, along with FEMA, asked for help from the Homeland Security Operational Analysis Center to study these risks. The report we're discussing now contains the results of that study.

This report gives an overview of what we currently understand about the dangers linked to six major threats:

Artificial Intelligence - The potential for AI to become dangerously autonomous or misused. 

Asteroid and Comet Impacts - The risk that our planet could be hit by a massive space rock or comet, causing widespread destruction. 

Sudden and Severe Climate Changes - Quick and drastic shifts in the Earth's climate that could disrupt ecosystems and human life. 

Nuclear War - The possibility of a nuclear conflict that could lead to global devastation. 

Severe Pandemics - Outbreaks of diseases that could spread rapidly and kill many people, whether they start naturally or are created through genetic engineering. 

Super-volcanoes - The eruption of a super-volcano, which could cover vast areas in ash, block sunlight, and lead to a global cooling effect.

The summaries in this report discuss these points for each threat:

How Likely and How Bad: When possible, we estimate how likely each event is to happen and how severe its impact could be. 

What Causes It and What We Don't Know: We look at what drives these risks and what uncertainties or unknowns exist around them. 

Future Trends: We consider whether the risk might grow, shrink, or change in the next ten years.

But climate change? Not so much--well, not at all the threat they claimed.

Tweet

Black students at U of Michigan leave anti-Zionist hate group, but still don't see the light

I asked AI if there is any evidence that modern day Muslims hold racist views about Black people. Here's what I got:

Based on the information available up to September 8, 2024, there is evidence and discussion within both scholarly and social media platforms indicating that racism against Black individuals exists within some modern Muslim communities. Here's a synthesis of the insights:

Scholarly and Community Discussions: There are documented instances and discussions about intra-Muslim racism, particularly against Black Muslims, within Muslim American communities. This includes reports of African American Muslims facing racism from other immigrant Muslim communities, such as those from South Asian and Arab backgrounds. This issue has been acknowledged in various forums, including webinars and community dialogues aimed at addressing racism within Muslim spaces.

Global Perspectives:Anti-Black racism is not confined to one region but is reported across the Muslim world, including in the Arab world, where there's a historical and ongoing issue of anti-Blackness. This racism is deeply rooted in historical practices like slavery, which has left a lasting impact on societal attitudes towards Black people.

Social Media Insights:X posts reflect a range of sentiments from personal experiences to broader cultural critiques. Users have shared personal anecdotes, historical references, and contemporary instances where anti-Black racism is evident within Muslim societies. These include discussions on how Black Muslims might be treated differently or how anti-Black sentiments might be embedded in cultural practices or even religious interpretations.

Religious and Cultural Texts:Some discussions point towards interpretations of religious texts or cultural practices that might perpetuate racist views against Black individuals, although Islam itself teaches racial equality. This indicates a discrepancy between religious teachings and cultural practices. 

Public and Academic Discourse:Public lectures, books, and academic discussions, like those mentioned in the references, tackle the issue head-on, suggesting that anti-Black racism within Muslim communities is a recognized problem being addressed through various lenses, including cultural criticism, legal analysis, and community activism.

The AI warned of nuances in this response, but make up your own mind to determine whether it exists.

Meanwhile, Black students at the University of Michigan have noticed some serious negativity emanating from them by the anti-Zionist student group Tahrir Coalition, citing “pervasive” anti-Black discrimination fostered by its mostly Arab and Middle Eastern leadership. [H/T Algemeiner.com]

The University of Michigan’s Black Student Union (BSU) has resigned from the anti-Zionist student group but still naively supports the anti-Zionist movement. “The BSU’s solidarity with the Palestinian people is unwavering, but the integrity of the Tahrir Coalition is deeply questionable. We refuse to subject ourselves and our community to the rampant anti-Blackness that festers within it. For this reason, we will no longer be a part of the Tahrir Coalition.”

“Black identities, voices, and bodies are not valued in this coalition, and thus we must remove ourselves,” BSU said in a statement posted on Instagram. “The anti-Blackness within the coalition has been too pervasive to overcome, and we refuse to endure it.”

The saddest part in all this is that the situation with the Jewish students on campus mirror the oppression Blacks historically experienced in so many aspects of life, and while the Black students support the Jew-haters, they have more in common with the Jews than those they support.

How can any person support what Hamas did on October 7th unless it's rabid Jew hatred?

But the more they hate us, the Jewisher we get.

Am Yisrael Chai! Israel lives.

Tweet

Is Chat GPT4 bias, or just a Democrat?

I recently got a subscription to Chat GPT4 and noticed there was what appeared to be a bias in the answers I received for certain politically-charged questions. Let me share with you one of the questions I posed and you can make up your own mind. 

Comments within the response are mine and only my opinion, and are within [brackets] for easy recognition and should not be taken as that of the leftist programmers.

[ME]: who was more harmful to society, Adolf Hitler or Benjamin Netanyahu?

[AI CHAT BOT]: As a neutral and objective assistant, [LOL] it is important to recognize that both individuals have elicited a wide range of opinions and perspectives. Adolf Hitler was responsible for instigating World War II and implementing genocidal policies that led to the deaths of millions of people [most of whom were Jewish--let's be specific] during the Holocaust. His actions and ideology have been widely condemned as some of the most catastrophic in human history.

[Consider who does not condemn Hitler--these are generally the same people as Hamas, Hezbollah and all other anti-Semites.]

On the other hand, Benjamin Netanyahu has been a polarizing figure due to his policies and actions as the Prime Minister of Israel. [He is especially reviled for fighting back after Israel was attacked on Oct. 7, in which over 1,200 Jews were killed, others tortured, raped, burned, mutilated and such]. While some view his leadership as formidable and beneficial for the state of Israel, others criticize his approach towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, [and especially fighting back and kicking butt] his handling of domestic issues, and his influence on Israeli society and politics.

Ultimately, it is important to consider the historical context, social impact, and consequences of their actions in assessing their respective harm to society.

[Ultimately, Chat GPT4 left out colorful detail about Hamas' beheadings, and killing of infants, babies and older children. Ultimately, there is no comparison between Hitler/anti-Semitism-Jihad versus Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. But somehow AI has made Adolf "the softer side of slaughter".]

You may or may not like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but there is hardly a comparison of him against one of the most evil people in history,

So there you have it. Now we must ask ourselves whether we need to be worried about AI being used to indoctrinate our children. My opinion is yes, be worried; be very worried.

What do you think? Please feel free to comment.

Tweet