Former Trump adviser says Cabinet members are plotting to remove POTUS

A report in the Washington Times said that according to former campaign adviser Roger Stone, some members of President Trump's own Cabinet have discussed plans to remove him from the White House by invoking the 25th Amendment.

Stone said during a recent C-SPAN interview that he heard some members of Trump's administration have weighed the possibility of taking him out of office.

"Do you have any evidence that anyone is actively plotting or attempting or laying the groundwork right now inside the Cabinet--inside the administration--to make that removal?" Tom LoBianco of the AP asked.

"I have sources, and I work my sources, and yes, I believe there are some who have had this discussion. This is both outside the Cabinet and in. I think it's the fallback plan for the establishment. That's why I'm trying to sound the clarion call," Mr. Stone said.

True to recent form as seen in the media, Stone declined to disclose names and specifics when pressed, but he insists his claim wasn't baseless.

"Like you, Tom, I cannot reveal those sources, and I'm not prepared to do so, but this is not a conspiracy theory," Stone told LoBianco. "There are members of the Cabinet who have had this discussion; let me just leave it at that."

Stone, 65, currently co-hosts an internet and radio program, "War Room," produced in connection with Alex Jones--a guy who hasn't met a conspiracy he doesn't like you to believe.

The White House did not respond to a media request for comment.



Tweet

Joy Villa files sexual assault report against Corey Lewandowski

Joy Villa, [that beautiful singer who wore a "Make America Great Again" dress to the Grammy Awards this year] has filed a sexual assault claim against Corey Lewandowski. 

You might remember Corey, he's the guy who belligerantly pushed Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields during the presidential campaign. He denied it happened but there's video evidence that appears to corroborate Fields' claim. Nothing was done and there were no repercussions for Lewandowski.

Ms. Villa, 31,  attended a Trump International Hotel party last month and filed a sexual assault report with the Metropolitan Police Department. She is an avid Trump supporter and is exploring a congressional bid in Florida. She alleged that Lewandowski slapped her on the butt, hard, twice, even after she voiced an objection.

She provided the names of two eyewitnesses to the police department when filing the report on December 24th, after Politico published details of her account of what happened.

Initially, she claims that she told a detective she wanted to file a sexual harassment claim, but he explained that the incident she described was considered a misdemeanor and that it belonged with the sex assault unit. "The detective I talked to said that sexual harassment is what happens in the workforce," she said in an interview. "The detective told me, 'what you describe happened to you is sexual assault.'"

Villa plans to meet with investigators in Washington.

A Metropolitan Police Department spokeswoman confirmed that a sexual assault case has been filed and that the paperwork is awaiting approval from a ranking officer.

Lewandowski has not responded for comment to the media.

Villa said she was introduced to Lewandowski by a mutual friend and was pushed toward him to pose for a photo at the party.

"I'm wearing this silver suit and stretchy pants, and after the photo, he smacks my ass really hard," she told Politico in an exclusive interview. "It was completely demeaning and shocking."

When she confronted him and said she could accuse him of sexual harassment, he laughed at her. "He said, 'Go ahead, I work in the private sector,'" she recalled. "Then he smacks my ass again."

When she was asked why she waited a month before speaking out, she said that she was afraid that it would backfire on her and she would get blamed.

Lewandowski is married and has children, which caused Villa to hesitate to share her story. She was also embarrassed for her own family to read about it, but after a friend saw what happened, shared the story with Politco last week, and Villa then decided to go public.



Tweet

Obama EPA regs based on 'junk science' ?

"Scientific" studies used by the Obama administration to justify ridiculous environmental regulation are actually being examined for their veracity as critics question their merit while the Trump EPA reverses of delays some of those rules, Fox News reported.

In one case, the Environmental Protection Agency never complied with a congressional subpoena for the data used to justify most Obama administration air quality rules. And Congress sat on their collective hands and did nothing while the law was being laughed at.

In another case, it was determined that research supporting a ban on a particular pesticide was probably bogus, similar to the: "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor . . . period," line of bull pucks.

"EPA regulations are based on secret data developed in the 1990s," said Steve Milloy, who served as President Trump's EPA transition team. "For the EPA, coming up with cherry-picked data is standard operating procedure," he told Fox News.

Milloy wrote: "Scare Pollution: Why and How to Fix the EPA." He is an attorney and worked for the Securities and Exchange Commission and is a critic who accuses federal agencies of selecting the research that fits their political agenda.

To deal with corruption, in October, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt issued a directive to ensure that those who serve on EPA advisory committees aren't eligible for EPA grants and are free from potential conflicts of interest.

"Whatever sciences comes out of EPA, shouldn't be political science," Pruitt said in a statement. "From this day forward, EPA advisory committee members will be financially independent from the agency."

Gee, what a novel idea.

But of course, environmental groups blasted that decision based on their own self-interests.

For more on the EPA and how the Trump administration is changing the game, go to Fox News.  


Tweet

Trump accuses FBI of using 'pile of garbage' dossier to attack him

President Trump called the "dossier" which was compiled during the 2016 campaign and had a number of strong negative allegations against him a "pile of garbage" and he even went so far as to accuse the FBI of relying on it to go after his campaign. As President, he has access to information that regular citizens don't have, but it isn't clear if he's 'shooting from the hip' or actually knows something we don't know.

Trump went on Twitter, as usual, in response to a Washington Post article that was later discussed on Fox News' "Fox & Friends," one of President Trump's favorite TV shows along with "Hannity," "Justice With Judge Jeanine," "The Ingraham Angle," "Watters' World," and "The Five."

The President tweeted:

"WOW, @foxandfriends 'Dossier is bogus. Clinton Campaign, DNC funded Dossier. FBI CANNOT (after all of this time) VERIFY CLAIMS IN DOSSIER OF RUSSIA/TRUMP COLLUSION. FBI TAINTED.' And they used Crooked Hillary pile of garbage as the basis for going after the Trump Campaign!"

The Washington Times reported that the FBI has acknowledged its central charges are unsubstantiated [and plan to only pursue it for another three, possibly seven more years, depending upon circumstances]. The FBI has not denied the dossier being part of their investigation.

At this point in the investigation, Congressional Republicans have been probing into how much federal investigators have relied on the dossier, specifically when they used it to justify a surveillance warrant against Carter Page, a former Trump adviser.

Former British spy Christopher Steele compiled the dossier after being hired by Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm, where the wife of a top FBI official involved with the case, Bruce Ohr, worked at the time the dossier was being compiled. Fusion GPS was paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

In a closed-door session last week with the House Intelligence Committee, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe stood by the dossier's credibility but when asked what in the document the bureau had corroborated, he could only cite the fact that Page had traveled to Moscow. The investigators said that McCabe couldn't even claim the FBI had verified the dossier's allegations about the specific meetings Page supposedly had in Moscow.

I traveled to Moscow on my way to India to visit my wife's family. I'm as guilty as Page of doing nothing wrong. I didn't even give a reset button to a Russian, nor tell a Russian leader that I'd have more 'flexibility' down the road.

I just wish Trump would learn better punctuation and form when tweeting.

SAD!!!???@


Tweet

The smug Bill de Blasio is his own biggest fan

The mayor of New York City Bill de Blasio (not his real name) does not believe he is similar to Jesus of Nazareth because he's an atheist. But he does liken himself to Henry Ford, Thomas Alva Edison and Mohandas Karamchand (Mahatma) Gandhi because he's delusional. He has never invented anything the public knows of, and never possessed one iota of humility. 

At 6 feet 5 inches, de Blasio is the tallest mayor in New York history, and ironically, he is also the most hated mayor by the New York Police Department rank and file. 

In fact, many people, when they think of de Blasio, think of an overachiever whose biggest claim to fame is his support of the Sandinista National Liberation Front, the ruling socialist government, which strongly opposed the Reagan government.

De Blasio traveled to Iowa in December and appears to have his eyes on the 2020 presidential election, although he flatly denies it, as he also denies engaging in sexually inappropriate behavior with three women on his staff, one man who identifies as a woman, and a chicken, according to my anonymous source.

Although he may not be lying about a presidential run, he has signaled in previous interviews that his sights are set on much more than doing damage to only New York City--he wants to do more.

To their credit, even Democrats think de Blasio is a detestable, self-congratulatory empty vessel--the kind that has nothing to offer, but makes the most noise.

"They think he's smug," Politico wrote. "The rap on de Blasio is that he likes to make a lot of noise but doesn't like to do a lot of work, that he has an oversize sense of his own importance."

De Blasio was confronted with his bold failure of a "progressive agenda" he initially hawked in 2014. He said it was "banal and simplistic" to say he might fail again if he takes his plan to the national stage:

"I want to talk to anyone who thinks that and tell them they need to start thinking more. I mean, give me a break. So every time someone tries something and it doesn't work, it invalidates anything else they might do going forward? Tell Thomas Edison that, and Henry Ford, tell Mahatma Gandhi. How many people fell on their faces along the way trying things, experimenting with things, had setbacks? There's no leader who hasn't had setbacks."

He apparently saw how foolish he sounded comparing himself to actual great people rather than action heroes. He quickly corrected himself by becoming momentarily self-deprecating as he referred to himself as a "speck on the universe" compared to those three, just trying to do his part.

We are all specks in the universe, when you get right down to it. But de Blasio is more like a puss pimple on the butt of the Democratic Party symbol.

If you're interested in what a smug fool he is, you can go to Politico and read more.


Tweet

Erdogan Lawlessness stirs fear of violence

"Was that you, Recep?"

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (his wife secretly calls him the "Fart Whisperer") just put out another emergency decree giving legal cover to pro-government vigilantes [aka goons] and opposition parties and legal authorities warn that it risks inciting violence.

The order was declared in the Official Gazette on Sunday. It grants sweeping immunity for acting against terrorism or attempts to overthrow Erdogan's government. Goons and civilians won't face legal consequences for actions against last year's coup attempt or anything that could be considered a "continuation" of the attempted coup, the decree stated.

Erdogan, you may recall, had his thugs assault American Turks protesting outside the Turkish embassy in the US. He is not a good man. In fact, he's the scum-wafer responsible for the resolution to oppose the United States putting our embassy in Jerusalem, as if it's his business rather than his Islamic anti-Semitism.

Erdogan and his allies habitually accuse all of his political opponents of furthering the agenda of the coup plotters, much like our US Democrats accuse Trump of plotting to destroy the country by lowering our taxes. This latest decree raises fear and concern as to how far his supporters will go, now that they have immunity to a lawful standard, to quell any opposition Erdogan receives. If the Turkish embassy protest is an example, all hell will break loose.

Opposition leaders led by the Republican People's Party (CHP) said the decree not only gives immunity to those who fought back the failed coup in July 2016, but it also gives immunity to supporters of Erdogan's government intent on shutting down all political dissent.

"They've paved the way for anyone who claims to be fighting against terrorism to slaughter everybody else," said Ozgur Ozel, a CHP parliament whip. "They will unleash vigilantes on us in a future democratic rally and will face no charges."

Gee, doesn't that remind you a little of Antifa?

Ozel's words were echoed across Turkey's normally fractured opposition spectrum as everyone not on the Erdogan bandwagon see what he's doing. Meral Aksener who leads the newly established IYI Party (Good Party) tweeted that the decree risks dragging the country into a civil war because it allows citizens to use weapons on the pretext of suppressing rebellion, [an idea not yet incorporated by the left in the US]. 

It also legitimizes using paramilitary forces, according to Ziya Pir, a lawmaker with the pro-Kurdish party HDP.

Even Abdullah Gul, a former president who co-founded the AKP with the Fart Whisperer warned of "events that could upset us all" and wants the law revised. He tweeted that its wording is "inappropriate for legal language and is worrying from the perspective of rule of law."

The gall of Gul is palpable because he preceded Erdogan in what now appears to be a throne of power and this is uncharacteristic of him to criticize the new Hitler.

Turkish lawyers are also quite horrified by the decree but Erdogan apparently doesn't care what anyone thinks.

Meanwhile, it's Israel that's constantly called out by the UN and its Islamic terrorist-funding countries, as a human rights violator. 


Tweet

Chicago cops angry over new stun-gun policy

The Chicago Police Department is getting sued for rewriting rules without input from the city's police union. Specifically, the new rules apply to the use of stun-guns.

No longer will police be permitted to use a stun-gun on people who are intoxicated and may pose a threat, running away both with and without a hostage in tow, and those who are vulnerable to injury, including physical, psychological or simply emotional. 

Police will need to make their own assessment in the latter case and if they are proved wrong as witnessed in a criminal who shows: sadness, anger, fear, confusion, resentment, the heebie-jeebies, or simple dismay, the arresting officer can and will be brought up on charges and can face suspension and criminal charges for firing a stun-gun without making a proper psych eval.

The tighter policy comes after an August investigation by the Chicago Tribune on the department's reliance on the devices. 

The cop on the beat may therefore be forced to use a handgun in order to avoid allegations of misuse of force.

Chicago police Superintendent Eddie Johnson overhauled the old department policy which unfortunately caused many criminals to be caught but saddened over the outcome. The new rules were introduced in May and enacted in October, according to the report.

Anti-criminal-escape critics attacked the policy calling it too permissive and the union representing rank-and-file cops argued the department didn't have the right to change the rules without its input and legally violated the union's collective bargaining rights.

Craig Futterman, a law professor at the University of Chicago, is suing the police department over its practices, and said the new policy doesn't go far enough. He to the Tribune that simply telling cops to stop shocking people with a stun-gun to avoid causing them emotional difficulty is only a half-measure. He would like cops to apologize to vulnerable criminals, drunks and fleeing felons if the cop so much as thinks about stun-gunning their butts.

"If cops would stay in better shape and stop frequenting Dunkin Donuts, they'd be able to catch folks running away even without a hostage in tow," Futterman said.

Geoffrey Alpert, an self-described "expert" on the use of force and a criminal justice professor at the University of South Carolina, thought the department's move was a good one. But he said that the move will be worthless without solid training, supervision and discipline.

In order to assist cops with determining the threat level of suspected perps, the department will be providing them with University of Chicago psychology courses, among them: intensive cognitive behavioral psychotherapy, psycho-diagnostics, interpretation of the Rorschach Inkblots and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, just for starters.

The real danger isn't the criminal who may have a hidden weapon, it's the beat cop who misdiagnoses a drunken bar brawler as a danger because he only got a "C" in Psych 101.

The Chicago PD had 745 stun-guns in 2015. Now they have about 4,000 and they're locked, loaded and all charged up to go.

Vvvvvvvvvvvvvvzzzzzzt!


Tweet

Theologean tax expert Rosie O'Donnell says Ryan will go to hell

Theological tax expert and failed comedian, Rosie O'Donnell says that House Speaker Paul Ryan pretends to be a Catholic alter boy, but she has word from above that he's going straight to hell when he dies after helping draft a tax reform bill that will save 80 percent of Americans money on their taxes.

Using a signature Trump ploy, the plump O'Donnell went to Twitter to tweet her religious/political beliefs.

"paul ryan--don't talk about Jesus after what u just did to our nation--you will go straight to hell."

Then she added:

"U screwed up fake alter boy."

She obviously forgot a comma after 'fake' but she only claims to be an expert on taxes and religion. She finished up her Christmas cheer with the hashtag: "#JUDASmuch" referring to Judah, who betrayed Jesus.

O'Donnell has thus far gotten away with attempting to bribe two senators $2 million each to vote against the tax bill. Instead of taking her sage advice, Senators Jeff Flake and Susan Collins voted for the tax bill which will save many people much money. 

Charges against the O'Donnell have not as yet been filed, but she will probably not be charged due to her sexual orientation, which somehow makes her a victim and free to do and say whatever she desires.

What appeared to set off the angry lesbian was a Christmas video message posted by Ryan honoring the birth of Jesus. 

A representative for the House Speaker responded to O'Donnell's characteristically livid tirade simply by saying, "We wish everyone a Merry Christmas!"

Perhaps it was the Trump-like exclamation point at the end of the sentence that got Rosie's goat, but got her goat it did.

Rosie has also gone after conservative commentator Ben Shapiro over the same GOP tax reform plan that flipped her out with Paul Ryan. 

She made an obscene sexual remark to Shapiro: "Suck my d**k, Ben," and also tweeted, "Lick me." 

Shapiro reported the harassment to Twitter as a test to see if they would take action against a liberal crap weasel, but they predictably did nothing and initially declined to delete the tweet, then later did.

Just to clear the record, Rosie is not a transgender guy pretending to be an obese woman. She is actually a female and does not have a d**k nor much of a brain, it seems. 

She ended up blocking Ben Shapiro because she isn't in the same league as he is and cannot possible go toe-to-toe in an actual political discussion.

However, she apparently knows if Ben is going to heaven or hell--she just isn't saying.

Merry Christmas everyone!

Tweet