Showing posts with label same-sex marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label same-sex marriage. Show all posts

Friday, April 19, 2019

LGBTQ attacks Chick-fil-A being served at White House

Women who like to engage in sex with women, men who like to do the same with men, folks who don't concern themselves with the gender of person with whom they engage in sex, people who are deluded into thinking they are not the gender their junk tells them they are, and just plain queers, denounced President Trump for serving chicken to a college football team at the White House on Monday.

But to be clear, it wasn't just chicken, it was anti-LGBTQ chicken. Flightless birds who gave their all to protest the sexual proclivities of heathens they abhor. It was Chick-fil-A chicken--the chicken of the right--which might explain why it tastes so good.

The LGBTQ  community doesn't like Chick-fil-A because the owner of the chain of fast food restaurants is a religious Christian who doesn't support same-sex marriage or the stuff mentioned in paragraph one [above.]

He doesn't hate gay people, in fact he employs them and serves them. He simply follows his religion and the LGBTQ community has a problem with that.



Follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and will hopefully entertain you bigly.





Friday, May 1, 2015

What is Freedom?


There are enough definitions of the term 'freedom' to satisfy everyone, but the definition that seems to make the most sense to me is . . . well . . . my own. After all, I like the idea of having the freedom to define what I believe freedom really means.

Freedom is the right to be left alone by others, particularly the government.  It is the right to do what you want to do with your life, your business, and just about anything you can imagine, as long as it doesn't harm others in any real way. For example, if my religion believes that same-sex marriage is a sin, then I should have the freedom not to be forced in sanctioning the wedding by my actions. Just as same-sex marriage should not be forbidden by law.

And governments should protect us from people and organizations that want to take that freedom of our beliefs from us. That is the one thing I see as government responsibility: protection of its citizens.

Overall, we ought to be able to lead our lives without some schmuck telling us how to go about the task of leading it. Someone telling us we must photograph their wedding, or bake a cake with a Nazi swastika because they happen to be a Nazi, or anything that goes against our personal beliefs is the opposite of freedom and must not be permitted.

Would you force a Halal catering company to cater a Bar Mitzvah or bake a gay wedding cake? Just try it--I can hear the scream of "Allahu Akbar!" now.

Regulations should be seen as policies that protect society, not a list of "musts" created by some low self-esteem dork who creates rules and regulations just to feel powerful and controlling. What regulations mainly do is stifle job growth because nobody wants to open a lemonade stand if they must fill out 23 pages of paperwork in triplicate. 

The same may be said about taxes. The government wants your money so they can squander it on some pork barrel project that ends up wasting millions.

Or politicians want your tax money so they can fly for free on vacation or vote themselves a raise.

Of course, some regulations are needed, but most of them are as useful as a fly-swatter to a frog. We need to be rid of stupid regulations immediately.

So if unions insist that it should be mandatory to join, then that union is trying to take away your freedom not to join. It's no different from Obamacare.

We need less government, and more freedom. 

In this digital age, we could easily get a popular consensus on many issues that affect us on a state level, so the federal government can be made much smaller, used primarily for national security and infrastructure.



Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Gay Schmay--Who Cares?

Is there something wrong with me that I get a bit nostalgic over the time when there were movies and other media that didn't have a perfunctory gay moment? Sure, you could say I'm homophobic, Islamophobic, and any other kind of phobic as a way of ending the discussion, but I honestly wish that people kept their sexual preferences to themselves.

A gay basketball player comes out of the closet (as if there are still closets of shame being gay--duh) and gets a phone call from Barack Obama telling him what a hero he is for telling the world he's gay. So who cares that he likes having sex with guys instead of women? For some reason I do not find that kind of admission heroic--there is no risk, nothing gained. I find admitting you're gay to be the new hip, new chic. I find our men and women in the military to be our real heroes.

And I do not have a problem with homosexual people anymore than I have a problem with heterosexual people. I just don't believe it needs to be shoved in our faces. As far as same-sex marriage, I believe it changes the definition of what I've always thought marriage is--but if two people of the same sex want to get married, I don't care. Really. I simply do not care but for some reason I believe that GLAAD wants me to care, wants me to condone it. But I don't condone it and I don't condemn it. 

If people need some kind of pride parade to honor who they are, I suspect they aren't as happy with who they are as they pretend to be. I certainly can be wrong about this, but that's my right.

But if photographers don't have the right to refuse to provide their services to a same-sex marriage, why does Starbucks have the right to provide service to police officers in uniform with their gun?


Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Let's Not Hold onto Holder

Why isn't anyone doing anything about Eric Holder and his refusal to uphold the Constitution? After all, that's his job and what he swore he would do. He didn't swear to uphold parts of it, especially those parts that the president also agrees to uphold. He agreed to uphold all of it. Sorry, but you don't get to choose, and you don't get to change the law to suit your purposes. Who does Eric Holder think he is, President Obama? Oh, wait--Obama made the same promise.

Conservatives Finally Find Yet Another Reason to Cancel Netflix

Netflix Discovers That Mocking a Murdered Conservative on the Anniversary of His Assassination Is Apparently Not Great for Customer Retentio...