Coins found in Israel building from 1,650 years ago speak volumes about Israel and the Jews

There is a building in the Israel town of Lod where a cache of coins were discovered dating back 1,650 years. Evidently, the person who lived there so long ago, left silver and bronze coins under the floorboards of the building and probably planned to go back and collect them at a later date. [H/T Jerusalem Post.]

The Lod Municipality and the Israel Antiquities Authorities (IAA) discovered the coins by chance while performing excavations of a destroyed Jewish public building. 

Experts said the coins are evidence of the last Jewish revolt against Roman rule in Israel – 1,650 years ago.

The dramatic discovery is the first-ever evidence in Lod from the Gallus Revolt, the last Jewish resistance against Roman rule, between 351 and 354 CE.

So this should give pause to those useful idiots who claim the Jews are occupying land belonging to so-called Palestinians, since they were there before Muhammed called his warriors together. But useful idiots will be useful idiots.

The coins are dated from 221- to 354 CE. It seems as if they were deliberately placed under the floorboards in the hopes of the owner returning to take them when the rebellious situation cooled down.

Though there is very little written evidence about this revolt, there are texts reporting that major Jewish communities such as Lod, Zipori and Tiberias were destroyed by the forces of Roman Caesar Flavius Constantinus Gallus.

The building where the coins were discovered

Beside finding coins, other impressive items were found such as stone and marble artifacts; Greek, Hebrew, and Latin inscriptions, and one inscription bearing the name of a Jewish man from a priestly family that is still being examined. 

What the excavators didn't find was the presence of pig bones because, unlike the Romans, the Jewish people are kosher and don't eat pork, a practice usurped by Islam thousands of years later, calling it halal. 

Tweet

Democrat Senator under federal investigation this time for accepting luxury car and apartment

Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) is once again under federal investigation, this time for allegedly accepting a luxury vehicle from a halal meat company. And now even his wife, Nadine Arslanian is involved over accepting gifts from IS EG Halal, in New Jersey.

The company won an exclusive contract with Egypt to certify halal meat exports to the country, which is rather strange seeing that the business is run by a non-Muslim who also lacks experience in halal certification. 

Now law enforcement is working to determine whether Menendez, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee [after having to step down in the past over these damning allegations] used his Senate seat and took action to benefit the company in exchange for gifts. The committee Menendez chairs hands out billions of dollars to Egypt, by the way.

"I am sure it is going to end up in absolutely nothing," Menendez told NBC News last week. And he's likely correct because there are some people who are untouched by the law, as if it doesn't apply to them. Hunter Biden and his dad comes to mind, as well as Antifa and BLM.

News of a federal investigation into the senator broke in November. The investigation dates back to 2019, when Egypt made the decision to grant IS EG Halal the exclusive contract.

Menendez was previously tried in 2017 in a public-corruption case, which ended in a mistrial. He was tried for allegedly taking $1 million in gifts—including private flights and trips—from his close friend Salomon Melgen, a Florida opthamalogist who wanted help with visas.

Tweet

Kills wife for having another girl, doesn't know biology

Ankara -- Try telling 29-year-old Veysi Turan of Turkey that it's the man's chromosomes that determine the gender of the child. A woman has the "X" chromosome and the man has both "X" and "Y" chromosomes. If his X combines with his wife's, the child is a girl. If his Y combines with her X, it's a boy. But only the man's sperm can determine the outcome.

Turan's wife gave birth to their second child, another girl. 

So he killed her. 

The method was electrocution and it was premeditated. He bought insulated gloves and cables to kill her the day after their daughter was born. But being a good citizen, while Turan was murdering his wife, 32-year-old Mubarek Turan, he was on the phone with the police telling them what he was in the process of doing.

The conversation went like this: 

"I killed someone," he told the operator."Who did you kill?" the officer asked."I am killing my wife right now.""Did you kill her or are you killing her?""Well, she isn't dead yet. But I am killing her if the murder is halal," Turan said.The officer asked if he had a problem with his wife."I am telling you that I killed my wife but you are asking what the problem was." Then he said, "I closed her mouth as she is in the throes of death."The officer then snapped, "Okay, wait. I am sending a unit."

A defense lawyer told the court that Turan killed his wife because she gave birth to "a girl once again." He also criticized the police for failing to talk Turan out of his crime--the lawyer must be a liberal.

"If a police officer with a high persuasive capacity and training were on the phone, [the woman] would be alive today." And possibly be living the life of a head of cabbage since Turan was killing her when he phoned.

Turan worked as a waiter at a restaurant in a Kurdish-majority region. He has a 4-year-old daughter but he wanted a boy, I suspect.

How very horrible . . . if only Turan understood biology, but still, he may have killed himself.


Tweet

Beheading and Halal

We are living at a time where our leaders believe that it is more important to be politically correct than it is to be actually correct. What do they need to fear--they have the relative safety of their security personnel to protect them. They don't believe they're in any danger from Islamic jihadists.

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has now picked up the role of Islamic scholar, much like Barack Obama (who actually might be one of those creatures) and John Cameron. When talking about the Islamic State, Abbott said: "This is the grim reality the world faces, now, this is why it is so important that what's being done by Daesh (Islamic State) has nothing to do with God, it has nothing to do with religion."

In philosophical terms, this is what's called "a boatload of crap."

If IS calls their behavior "jihad," and protects the reputation of their pedophile, terrorist, slave-owning, thieving prophet, because Islamic scripture demands they do, then how is this not about Islam?

For Abbott, and the rest of the Western so-called leaders who claim that Islam is a religion of peace, it is totally clear that they are more concerned with maintaining the politically correct fiction about Islam than it is to be honest and deal with the problem the Western world faces.

Beheading, or otherwise killing unbelievers, is as Halal as Campbell's soup.

Qur'an (8:12) "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."

Qur'an (8:39) "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disbelief, disorder) and religion should be only for Allah."

Qur'an (47:4) "When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks."

Qur'an (9:5--aka 'Sura of the Sword') "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate (the jizya), leave their way free to them." 

So I would ask Tony Abbott, Barack Hussein Obama, and John Cameron, what part of the Qur'an quoted above is unclear? What is IS doing that goes against Islamic scripture? And where did you learn that IS has nothing to do with God?


Tweet

Holder MIA from Unity March

Paris held a unity march today to show solidarity in the West for freedom of expression. Islamic terrorists tried to show the world that insulting the prophet of Islam (a guy who at 52 married a 6 year old child and consummated the marriage three years later) will get you killed. The "brother in arms" of the two who killed 12 people involved with the Charlie Hebdo incident, killed shoppers at a Kosher (the Jewish version the Muslims took from them and called halal) supermarket. 

Je suis sur le telephone 

Both of these incidents are not only related through the relationship the gunmen had with each other, but with the relationship that Islamic terrorists see in the Koran and Hadith, aka Islamic scripture.

There were heads of 40 countries at the unity march. French President Hollande, British Prime Minister David Cameron (you remember he claimed that Islam is a religion of peace and all that stuff), Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Germany's Angela Merkel, and even Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Okay, so Abbas and Netanyahu didn't hold hands and kiss each other on the cheek, but they both stood out in front of the dignitaries and showed solidarity with them.

Barack Hussein Obama was not among the world leaders in attendance at the unity march, and for very good reason--he is not a world leader. He isn't even a good manager.

Instead, Department of Justice Attorney General, Eric Holder, was  sent to Paris in Barack's place. Only Holder was nowhere to be seen in the group of world leaders. There were nobody from our government showing the West that the United States of America stands with you in this fight against the attempted destruction of Western civilization. No one reportedly showed up from Congress either.

Some estimates said that a million people were there; some claim about 700 thousands. Only Holder was assigned to attend the terrorism meeting and he was nowhere to be seen with the main group of leaders.

Speaking from Paris over an absent chin, Holder said that there isn't  "any credible information" to determine which terrorist group is responsible for the Paris attacks.

I know with absolute certainty who did it. I just don't believe Holder or Obama want to actually discuss who the responsible terrorist group is, but I'll say it anyway:

Where's Waldo Holder?

The group responsible for the slaughter of the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists and policewoman, and the other man responsible for killing shoppers at the Kosher supermarket were from the same group. They were from a group called radical Muslims.

Does it really matter that one group follows ISIS and the other al Qaeda? One may follow Hamas, Hezbollah, Boko Haram, Abdullah Azzam Brigades, al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade, Al-Nusra Front, Al-Shabab, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, Takfir wal-Hijra, Ansar al-Sharia, Ansar al-Islam, Army of Islam, Haqqani network, or even the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. I can go on, but it doesn't make a difference. They all hate the West and they all want to kill us, take us captive, and make sex slaves out of our women as their booty.

Al Qaeda's Yemen branch claims it directed the attack by the two brothers against Charlie Hebdo. The Islamic State is claiming credit for the Kosher supermarket slaughter.

As a lady in a polyester pants suit once said: "What difference does it make, at this point?" I say it doesn't make a difference. It's all the same religion and the names change based on geography and leadership.

Disclaimer: Not all Muslims want to kill us. Many of course wouldn't complain if someone else did the killing instead, but the majority of Muslims are peaceful, and yadda, yadda. 

The peaceful Muslims may forever hate the Jews simply for being born, not even knowing why they're supposed to hate them, but they will not actually go out and kill Jews, burn down synagogues or churches, and do all they can to ensure that the entire world prays to their god and those who don't will pay the jizya tax.

But if only 10% of all 1.7 billion Muslims in the world are willing to make trouble, that's a hell of a lot of Muslims. Some polls indicate the number of Muslims who supported the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks is at least twice as high as that, and many support the atrocities of the Islamic State and other terrorist groups in their "defense of Islam."

People are killed for "insulting Islam." I don't know how an ideology can be insulted. I know how it can be intellectually challenged, but to insult an idea is a non sequitur. To insult means to attack one's feelings or emotions about an issue. Islam isn't a living thing--it's a geopolitical philosophy born from war and conquest. The theological premises of Islam are so weak that one can be put to death for even questioning it.

How weak is that?



Tweet

Nidal Hasan is no Vidal Sassoon

We're in the third day of the trial of the Fort Hood shooter, Nidal Hasan. I refuse to refer to him by his rank just like I refuse to refer to Al Sharpton by his honorific. Thus far, the terrorist only cross examined two of his victims. 



Many believe Hasan actually wants the death penalty. I disagree. People want to have life ever after--they want to go to whatever they think is the kind of afterlife that follows our time here on earth. Hasan wants to go to Paradise, get his virgins who never lose their virginity because, I suppose they have self-repairing hymens, (the koran doesn't specify, or does the hadith), and drink from rivers of wine, which they're not allowed to have while on earth. Makes sense they'd want to go elsewhere for their fun.