Posts
Paris held a unity march today to show solidarity in the West for freedom of expression. Islamic terrorists tried to show the world that insulting the prophet of Islam (a guy who at 52 married a 6 year old child and consummated the marriage three years later) will get you killed. The "brother in arms" of the two who killed 12 people involved with the Charlie Hebdo incident, killed shoppers at a Kosher (the Jewish version the Muslims took from them and called halal) supermarket.
Both of these incidents are not only related through the relationship the gunmen had with each other, but with the relationship that Islamic terrorists see in the Koran and Hadith, aka Islamic scripture.
There were heads of 40 countries at the unity march. French President Hollande, British Prime Minister David Cameron (you remember he claimed that Islam is a religion of peace and all that stuff), Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Germany's Angela Merkel, and even Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Okay, so Abbas and Netanyahu didn't hold hands and kiss each other on the cheek, but they both stood out in front of the dignitaries and showed solidarity with them.
Barack Hussein Obama was not among the world leaders in attendance at the unity march, and for very good reason--he is not a world leader. He isn't even a good manager.
Instead, Department of Justice Attorney General, Eric Holder, was sent to Paris in Barack's place. Only Holder was nowhere to be seen in the group of world leaders. There were nobody from our government showing the West that the United States of America stands with you in this fight against the attempted destruction of Western civilization. No one reportedly showed up from Congress either.
Some estimates said that a million people were there; some claim about 700 thousands. Only Holder was assigned to attend the terrorism meeting and he was nowhere to be seen with the main group of leaders.
Speaking from Paris over an absent chin, Holder said that there isn't "any credible information" to determine which terrorist group is responsible for the Paris attacks.
I know with absolute certainty who did it. I just don't believe Holder or Obama want to actually discuss who the responsible terrorist group is, but I'll say it anyway:
The group responsible for the slaughter of the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists and policewoman, and the other man responsible for killing shoppers at the Kosher supermarket were from the same group. They were from a group called radical Muslims.
Does it really matter that one group follows ISIS and the other al Qaeda? One may follow Hamas, Hezbollah, Boko Haram, Abdullah Azzam Brigades, al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade, Al-Nusra Front, Al-Shabab, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, Takfir wal-Hijra, Ansar al-Sharia, Ansar al-Islam, Army of Islam, Haqqani network, or even the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. I can go on, but it doesn't make a difference. They all hate the West and they all want to kill us, take us captive, and make sex slaves out of our women as their booty.
Al Qaeda's Yemen branch claims it directed the attack by the two brothers against Charlie Hebdo. The Islamic State is claiming credit for the Kosher supermarket slaughter.
As a lady in a polyester pants suit once said: "What difference does it make, at this point?" I say it doesn't make a difference. It's all the same religion and the names change based on geography and leadership.
Disclaimer: Not all Muslims want to kill us. Many of course wouldn't complain if someone else did the killing instead, but the majority of Muslims are peaceful, and yadda, yadda.
The peaceful Muslims may forever hate the Jews simply for being born, not even knowing why they're supposed to hate them, but they will not actually go out and kill Jews, burn down synagogues or churches, and do all they can to ensure that the entire world prays to their god and those who don't will pay the jizya tax.
But if only 10% of all 1.7 billion Muslims in the world are willing to make trouble, that's a hell of a lot of Muslims. Some polls indicate the number of Muslims who supported the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks is at least twice as high as that, and many support the atrocities of the Islamic State and other terrorist groups in their "defense of Islam."
People are killed for "insulting Islam." I don't know how an ideology can be insulted. I know how it can be intellectually challenged, but to insult an idea is a non sequitur. To insult means to attack one's feelings or emotions about an issue. Islam isn't a living thing--it's a geopolitical philosophy born from war and conquest. The theological premises of Islam are so weak that one can be put to death for even questioning it.
How weak is that?
Tweet
 |
| Je suis sur le telephone |
Both of these incidents are not only related through the relationship the gunmen had with each other, but with the relationship that Islamic terrorists see in the Koran and Hadith, aka Islamic scripture.
There were heads of 40 countries at the unity march. French President Hollande, British Prime Minister David Cameron (you remember he claimed that Islam is a religion of peace and all that stuff), Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Germany's Angela Merkel, and even Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Okay, so Abbas and Netanyahu didn't hold hands and kiss each other on the cheek, but they both stood out in front of the dignitaries and showed solidarity with them.
Barack Hussein Obama was not among the world leaders in attendance at the unity march, and for very good reason--he is not a world leader. He isn't even a good manager.
Instead, Department of Justice Attorney General, Eric Holder, was sent to Paris in Barack's place. Only Holder was nowhere to be seen in the group of world leaders. There were nobody from our government showing the West that the United States of America stands with you in this fight against the attempted destruction of Western civilization. No one reportedly showed up from Congress either.
Some estimates said that a million people were there; some claim about 700 thousands. Only Holder was assigned to attend the terrorism meeting and he was nowhere to be seen with the main group of leaders.
Speaking from Paris over an absent chin, Holder said that there isn't "any credible information" to determine which terrorist group is responsible for the Paris attacks.
I know with absolute certainty who did it. I just don't believe Holder or Obama want to actually discuss who the responsible terrorist group is, but I'll say it anyway:
 |
| Where's Waldo Holder? |
The group responsible for the slaughter of the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists and policewoman, and the other man responsible for killing shoppers at the Kosher supermarket were from the same group. They were from a group called radical Muslims.
Does it really matter that one group follows ISIS and the other al Qaeda? One may follow Hamas, Hezbollah, Boko Haram, Abdullah Azzam Brigades, al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade, Al-Nusra Front, Al-Shabab, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, Takfir wal-Hijra, Ansar al-Sharia, Ansar al-Islam, Army of Islam, Haqqani network, or even the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. I can go on, but it doesn't make a difference. They all hate the West and they all want to kill us, take us captive, and make sex slaves out of our women as their booty.
Al Qaeda's Yemen branch claims it directed the attack by the two brothers against Charlie Hebdo. The Islamic State is claiming credit for the Kosher supermarket slaughter.
As a lady in a polyester pants suit once said: "What difference does it make, at this point?" I say it doesn't make a difference. It's all the same religion and the names change based on geography and leadership.
Disclaimer: Not all Muslims want to kill us. Many of course wouldn't complain if someone else did the killing instead, but the majority of Muslims are peaceful, and yadda, yadda.
The peaceful Muslims may forever hate the Jews simply for being born, not even knowing why they're supposed to hate them, but they will not actually go out and kill Jews, burn down synagogues or churches, and do all they can to ensure that the entire world prays to their god and those who don't will pay the jizya tax.
But if only 10% of all 1.7 billion Muslims in the world are willing to make trouble, that's a hell of a lot of Muslims. Some polls indicate the number of Muslims who supported the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks is at least twice as high as that, and many support the atrocities of the Islamic State and other terrorist groups in their "defense of Islam."
People are killed for "insulting Islam." I don't know how an ideology can be insulted. I know how it can be intellectually challenged, but to insult an idea is a non sequitur. To insult means to attack one's feelings or emotions about an issue. Islam isn't a living thing--it's a geopolitical philosophy born from war and conquest. The theological premises of Islam are so weak that one can be put to death for even questioning it.
How weak is that?
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment