Showing posts with label extremism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label extremism. Show all posts

Thursday, October 30, 2025

Hamas's Latest Defiance: A 24-Hour Ultimatum Ignored, as Israel's Resolve Hardens


In the grim theatre of Gaza's endless absurdities, where Hamas plays the role of the unyielding fanatic and the world its bewildered audience, comes yet another chapter of predictable perfidy. The Israel Defense Forces, holding firm to their "Yellow Line"—that fragile ribbon of restraint amid the rubble—have issued a stark warning to the terrorists ensconced behind it. And, as one might have foreseen, Hamas has responded with the silence of the grave it so eagerly digs for others.

A US official, speaking to The Jerusalem Post, laid bare the mediators' desperate diplomacy: Hamas was informed, through the good (or at least intermediary) offices of Egypt and Qatar, to withdraw from behind the Yellow Line before Thursday evening, lest the IDF unleash its righteous fury.

"That 24-hour window expired at 8 p.m. local time, at which point Israel will enforce the ceasefire and engage Hamas targets behind the yellow line," the source stated, with the crisp finality of a man who has seen too many deadlines dissolve into dust.

"Last night, Hamas was notified through Egypt and Qatar that they had 24 hours to evacuate their terrorists from the area behind the yellow line currently being held by the IDF," the source elaborated, underscoring the multinational seal of approval on this ultimatum. "That 24-hour window expired at 8 p.m. local time, at which point Israel will enforce the ceasefire and engage Hamas targets behind the yellow line. This guidance was issued with approval from the United States, Egypt, and Qatar," the source stressed—a rare moment of alignment in a region where alliances shift like desert sands.

One might pause here to marvel at the spectacle: the United States, Egypt, and Qatar, three powers whose records on Islamist extremism range from the comically inconsistent to the outright enabling, now united in urging restraint on the very restraint that has kept Israel's hand from total devastation. Yet Hamas, true to form, has decamped not an inch. Their refusal is not mere obstinacy; it is the essence of their creed, a jihadist calculus where every concession is a betrayal of the divine delusion that animates them.

Compounding this farce is the matter of the hostages, those spectral figures whose fates hang like Damocles' sword over the negotiations. Hamas, in a predictable breach that is as brazen as it is heartbreaking, failed to release all the deceased captives in one fell swoop during the ceasefire's fragile dawn. Israeli officials, their patience frayed to the thread of steel, accuse the group of deliberate procrastination, a tactic as old as terror itself.

"There is little pressure on the organization from the mediators to release more hostages, and some of the bodies are located in places that will make a swift return difficult," an Israeli official confided to The Post, his words laced with the quiet outrage of the bereaved. "We still have leverage to apply pressure on the organization to return the hostages, and there are two more hostages we believe they can return immediately. Still, there is concern that we may see another situation where days go by without any bodies being returned."

How telling, this admission of mediator torpor. In the salons of Cairo and Doha, where the air is thick with the scent of incense and inaction, the urgency to reclaim even the dead evaporates like morning mist. Hamas, for its part, hoards these remains as bargaining chips in a game where human dignity is the first casualty. One wonders: if the bodies of innocents—tortured, desecrated, discarded like refuse—cannot stir the world's moral reflexes, what will? Another cycle of rocket fire? Another festival of global condemnation aimed squarely at the one force daring to fight back?

As the clock ticks past 8 p.m., and the IDF prepares to redraw the lines in fire, let us dispense with illusions. This is no mere skirmish in a ceasefire's footnotes; it is the unvarnished truth of a war where one side seeks annihilation and the other survival. Israel, cornered by geography and gaslit by geopolitics, must now act as judge, jury, and executioner in the court of necessity. Hamas, meanwhile, will cry victim from the shadows, their martyrdom myth intact—until the next yellow line is crossed, and the next ultimatum echoes into the void.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Wednesday, June 8, 2022

Indian woman makes historically correct comment about Islam's prophet and enrages Muslims




Nupur Sharma made an historically accurate comment on TV a few weeks ago about Islam's prophet Muhammed, and now Indian Muslims would like to cancel her . . . forever. 

What Sharma said was that Muhammed married Aisha when she was 6-years-old [and he was already in his 50s]. She was playing with dolls when he first saw her and Aisha's father asked that Muhammed please wait until she was older before having sex with her; so he waited three years until she was nine and then consummated the marriage.

That information is in the Hadith--the text which explains the chapters [suras] in the Koran, but somehow it angers Muhammed's followers when it's mentioned.

Sharma's remarks have outraged Indian Muslims and over a dozen Islamic nations. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is experiencing immense blowback over her words about the pedophilic behavior of Muhammed.

Her crime was to accurately paraphrase Islamic scripture

On Sunday, the BJP suspended Sharma from the party along with the head of BJP's Delhi media unit, Naveen Kumar Jindal [no relation to Bobby], for publishing a screenshot of her comment in a tweet.

The BBC called Ms. Sharma's comment 'offensive,' but if it's historically true, why are Muslims offended? Are they experiencing cognitive dissonance regarding their prophet and only feel anger toward those who point out his pedophilia? Is it that they know what he did was wrong but need to transfer blame to those who mention it?

In a statement, the BJP said it was "against any ideology which insults or demeans any sect or religion" and added that it did not "promote such people or philosophy." But Islam clearly insults and demeans other religions, particularly Judaism, saying that Jews are descended from apes and pigs. They also include Christians, but slightly less vehemently. 

So even the BJP are comprised of hypocrites, but perhaps they need to be in order to avoid violence.

Indian diplomats have said the comments did not reflect the stand of the government and that they were "views of fringe elements." But Nupur Sharma, 37, is hardly a fringe element. Until her axing from the party, she was a highly sought-after "official BJP spokesperson." She had appeared on many TV debates where she represented and defended Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

Sharma earned her law degree at Delhi University [GO COBRAS!] and began her political career in 2008 as president of the students' union as a candidate of Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), which is the student wing of the Hindu nationalist Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh movement.

But make no mistake: Nupur Sharma's life is in danger. Islamic extremists will not let this go in spite of the veracity of her comment, and India will do little to nothing to stop it. 

Saturday, January 21, 2017

Woman suicide bomber detonates with baby strapped to her back

Leftists like Obama say that the Islamic State is neither Islamic nor is it a state. If by Islamic he means a way the religion of Islam is practiced, he's wrong. If he mean by a state that the Islamic State has not established territory they claim as their caliphate, well, he's wrong again.

The same is true about the Taliban, al Qaeda, and basically any extremist practice of Islam.

If religion is having faith that a belief in their version of God will provide them with rewards in the hereafter, you can say that the Islamic State and the rest of the extremist religious terrorist groups is an example of a stronger faith than we see in the West, for the most part.


Extremists are so certain that their brand of Islam is the right brand. So sure they will go to Paradise for jihad, they are ready to die in the spirit of the Qur'an's promises.

Three women suicide bombers carried out an attack in Madagali, Adamawa State, Nigeria. One of the women had a baby strapped to her back. Nine people were killed, including two local vigilantes at a checkpoint where vehicles are screened before being allowed into town.

Imagine strapping your baby to your back, knowing you're both going to die for Allah. You would have to think that you're doing a wonderful thing for your baby. 

What a schizophrenic belief system the extremists have.

But don't tell me it isn't Islam--read the murder book called the Qur'an. 


Sunday, December 25, 2016

German politician gets head stuck in nether regions

Germany -- A politician prevented the police from publishing photos of the Berlin jihadi who mowed down Christmas shoppers with a truck. The reason: he feared the photos would incite "racial hatred."

So let's get this straight: if an Islamic extremist is on a mission to kill people, we don't want to put his photo out in public because it might spark racial hatred and lead people to dislike Muslims.

The idiot in question is Till Steffen.

In an article by Dave Burke (writing for Mailonline, Dec. 23, 2016) entitled: "He's more concerned about Facebook comments than catching a terrorist: German politician faces resignation calls after preventing police sharing image of Berlin truck killer," he says:
A German politician is facing calls to resign over allegations that he prevented police from sharing pictures of the Berlin truck terrorist when he was at large.
Reports in Germany claim that Till Steffen prevented law enforcers in Hamburg from releasing pictures of Anis Amri, despite him being the most wanted man in the world after Monday's terror attack. 
Amri, 24, was named as a suspect on Wednesday after his wallet was found in the lorry which ploughed into a crowd of people at a Berlin Christmas market, killing 12 people.
It has been alleged that Steffen, who is head of the judicial authority in Hamburg, prevented the pictures being circulated because he feared sharing images of Islamist terror suspects will incite racial hatred. 
Newspaper Bild reported that police were able to give a description of the killer, but not show the public what he looked like because of privacy concerns.
Insiders claim he was worried the pictures of terror suspects incite racial hatred. 
Joachim Lenders, chairman of Hamburg's regional police force, is quoted by Bild stating: 'It is incomprehensible that investigating authorities are thrown such truncheons.'
The Green politician, who is head of the judicial authority in Hamburg, only granted an exception after a call from the newspaper, following a 12 hour delay, it reports.

Steffen's phobia of being accused of having Islamophobia is exactly what Islamic extremists invented the word for in the first place.

Steffen needs to either resign or be thrown out of office by the scruff of his neck. But to do that, first his head needs to be removed from his nether regions.


Thursday, May 17, 2012

Challenging Islam and Saving Your Head

They say not all Muslims are terrorists but most terrorists are Muslim.  There's some truth to that statement and to deny it is merely a stab  at political correctness (forgive the pun) .  We remove our shoes at the airport, spill out liquids, deny access to nuns, 87 year old invalids in wheelchairs, and babies with middle eastern names that ring a bell.  The enemy is not the bomb or terrorism; the enemy is the terrorist and the reason they exist to kill us is written in their scripture. They are not extremists; they are religious.

Imagine you're a journalist for a  Manhattan newspaper and one day while working on your novel you hear a commotion and discover you're under a terrorist attack.  You are captured, blindfolded and taken hostage to their remote safe house.  They're going to kill you--cut off your head and show it on YouTube for all the Western world to see unless the President allows the release of three Guantanamo Bay jihadists.  The protocol is clear, the United States of America will not give in to terrorist's demands.  The beheading will take place the next day if he doesn't change his mind.


Yusuf, the lone terrorist guarding you, has your life in his hands and you have only one way out of this situation and only one day to save yourself.  You must convince him that the religion he puts all his faith in is not a true religion and that the Quran, the Islamic holy book, cannot possibly be the actual word of God.  

The clock is ticking  . . . 
 


 
Jihad Joe Soft Cover           

IDF seizes huge Iran terror axis arsenal but the fingerprints on them are damning

Israel’s capture of a vast arsenal from Iran’s terror proxies reveals an axis with the most unexpected originsAmong the weapons taken from H...