Indian woman makes historically correct comment about Islam's prophet and enrages Muslims

Nupur Sharma made an historically accurate comment on TV a few weeks ago about Islam's prophet Muhammed, and now Indian Muslims would like to cancel her . . . forever. 

What Sharma said was that Muhammed married Aisha when she was 6-years-old [and he was already in his 50s]. She was playing with dolls when he first saw her and Aisha's father asked that Muhammed please wait until she was older before having sex with her; so he waited three years until she was nine and then consummated the marriage.

That information is in the Hadith--the text which explains the chapters [suras] in the Koran, but somehow it angers Muhammed's followers when it's mentioned.

Sharma's remarks have outraged Indian Muslims and over a dozen Islamic nations. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is experiencing immense blowback over her words about the pedophilic behavior of Muhammed.

Her crime was to accurately paraphrase Islamic scripture

On Sunday, the BJP suspended Sharma from the party along with the head of BJP's Delhi media unit, Naveen Kumar Jindal [no relation to Bobby], for publishing a screenshot of her comment in a tweet.

The BBC called Ms. Sharma's comment 'offensive,' but if it's historically true, why are Muslims offended? Are they experiencing cognitive dissonance regarding their prophet and only feel anger toward those who point out his pedophilia? Is it that they know what he did was wrong but need to transfer blame to those who mention it?

In a statement, the BJP said it was "against any ideology which insults or demeans any sect or religion" and added that it did not "promote such people or philosophy." But Islam clearly insults and demeans other religions, particularly Judaism, saying that Jews are descended from apes and pigs. They also include Christians, but slightly less vehemently. 

So even the BJP are comprised of hypocrites, but perhaps they need to be in order to avoid violence.

Indian diplomats have said the comments did not reflect the stand of the government and that they were "views of fringe elements." But Nupur Sharma, 37, is hardly a fringe element. Until her axing from the party, she was a highly sought-after "official BJP spokesperson." She had appeared on many TV debates where she represented and defended Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

Sharma earned her law degree at Delhi University [GO COBRAS!] and began her political career in 2008 as president of the students' union as a candidate of Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), which is the student wing of the Hindu nationalist Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh movement.

But make no mistake: Nupur Sharma's life is in danger. Islamic extremists will not let this go in spite of the veracity of her comment, and India will do little to nothing to stop it. 

Tweet

India's Victory, Islam's Loss

The votes are in and Narendra Modi, of the Bharariya Janata Party is the new Prime Minister of India. Modi won in a landslide over the Congress Party, which had been in the center of Indian politics since the country's independence from Britain in 1947.

And the one group of people India can thank for the victory are the Islamic jihadist/terrorists.

Hassanal Bolkia smiling

While Hollywood awoke from its coma a few days ago and boycotted the Beverly Hills Hotel, when Brunei's leader, Sultan Hassanal Bolkia set the country's clocks back 1400 by re-implementing sharia law, Modi has known all along what the jihadists in India intend to do with his country.

If you don't know what sharia law is (and it's often capitalized by those who respect it), you probably read Time, or The New York Times, or only watch mainstream television. Most people in the know, which really means people who aren't liberal, are aware of the archaic, demonic, misogynistic, anti-Semitic, cruel, and intolerance of Islam. Sharia is its constitution--it allows the killing of those who leave the religion for one less violent or none at all; it punishes gays by hanging from a "high place;" it demeans women by taking away most of their rights; and it thoroughly enjoys be-headings, stonings, burning of individuals, and killing Jews for being Jewish.

But Hollywood seems to just be finding out about sharia. When they learned Bolkia re-implemented sharia and owns the Beverly Hills Hotel, they grabbed their signs and self-righteous indignation, and performed protest rallies. There was Jay Leno with time on his hands, Ellen DeGeneres, and Richard Bronson out there in protest. 

Where was the left when Ayaan Hirsi-Ali was banned from Brandeis? Why were they mute about the 50 boys who were burned to death by Boko Haram, but finally woke up when 276 school girls were kidnapped? 

But armed with their trusty hashtags and scowling faces, they are fighting the good virtual fight. I'm sure the jihadists of Boko Haram are peeing in their lungies, quaking in fear that Michelle Obama will force them to read her sign while Hillary tells her to be cool, "they aren't really terrorists."

India has the advantage over the US right now. They know who the enemy is and they refuse to allow them to put their foot in the door and work their way into their government. Unlike Obama, they don't invite them to their Parliament House.

In my latest novel, a New York reporter is taken hostage by terrorists. If POTUS refuses to release 3 Gitmo jihadists, the reporter will die in 24 hours—they will behead him and show it on the Internet. There is only one way out but the clock is ticking . . .

Jihad Joe: a Novel  Create Space soft cover book edition

Jihad Joe see it here ebook version

Tweet