UC student who stole 'MAGA' hat may face felony charge

An apparent mentally challenged female liberal college student at the University of California stole a 'Make America Great Again' hat from Matthew Vitale during a campus meeting. Vitale is a member of the University of California Riverside Republicans and he plans to file criminal charges against the low-functioning Edith Macias.

The entire profanity-laced incident went viral on YouTube when Macias posted her "SnatchAHat" video online. It shows her physically grabbing Vitale's hat from his head and then verbally assaulting him for "genocide," a word she probably should look up.

By posting the video and showing that she took it from the young Republican, the brilliant Macias raised the crime to a felony. She is likely not a law major--probably majors in lesbian dance theory.

Now that the video was released, Vitale says he wants her arrested.

He spoke to Todd Starnes on a Fox Radio interview. "Honestly, this isn't me trying to get revenge on her," he said, "this is me just trying to say: 'Look, behavior like this is not tolerated in this country. There are individual rights and individual freedoms that we are granted as per the Constitution, that everybody's granted. It doesn't matter what your beliefs are.'"

University chancellor Kim A. Wilcox released a statement calling for "respectful dialogue" but Vitale said it didn't go far enough in condemning Macias' [bizarre, illegal] behavior.

Wilcox said in a statement that "Coequal to our dedication to mutual respect is our commitment to free speech and the free exchange of ideas." A university requires an environment where students and scholars can freely express ideas and pursue knowledge, while promoting respectful dialogue among individuals or groups with opposing viewpoints [unless you're a conservative or Milo Yiannopoulos]."

Vitale said her response was "very disappointing." 

"UCR affirms its dedication to free speech, but [adds] free speech has to come under shared values of mutual respect, which is not freedom of speech," Vitale said. "The moment that you stop protecting speech that is controversial, is the moment that your right to speak your mind is taken away."

A spokesman for U of C told Fox News that the school champions free speech--as long as it remains cordial. But he was not at all clear as to where he would draw the line, and the U.S. Constitution doesn't mention the word 'cordial' in the same context as freedom of speech.

Schools used to be bastions for free speech. Now they're bastions for free liberal speech.

A number of profoundly libtarded students on campus started a "Statement of Solidarity with Edith Macias." The statement claims free speech has been "used as a dog whistle for the protection of white supremacists violence in the University of California system and elsewhere." 

They provided zero examples.

Like the way Antifa claims to be against fascism but are themselves tactically fascist, the Solidarity with Edith Macias idiots are claiming Macias is the one being "harassed," not Vitale. 

They also say that she has been "doxxed," which is defined by Google as: "search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent."

Again, there is nothing to support their ridiculous claim. They just like to hear themselves pretending to be relevant.

Because of the terrible things that have happened to the perpetrator, they demand the university pay Macias' rent, grant her amnesty, cover her legal fees, condemn white supremacists [including all white people who were born white on purpose or by accident], and support a sanctuary campus.

Why not demand the university supply her with a clothing allowance, free tuition and books, and grant her degree in lesbian dance theory?

These people are crazy and Vitale dismisses them as a fringe group and says that he's "overwhelmed" by the support he's received from across the country and from both sides of the aisle. 

He believes that freedom of speech can be a nonpartisan issue that all can rally around.


Tweet

Verbal contortions and the religion of peace

He wore black and had an Islamic State manifesto in his backpack along with an ISIS flag. He wrote a reminder to himself to say a prayer after each person he stabbed. He was a Muslim and yes, his last name was Mohammad, in honor of the so-called prophet he professed to believe in.

He stabbed four people at the University of California Merced campus as he shouted "Allahu Akbar," or "Allah is greater," as he carried out the horrible task. 

Whatever motivated Faisal Mohammad to go on a stabbing spree has mystified the FBI. It has them scratching their collective heads, wondering why would a young, Muslim man, with a love for the Koran and everything to live for, attempt to murder innocent Christians.

After Muhammad Atta and his Muslim crew flew planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and also into a Pennsylvania field, failing to reach its White House target, George W. Bush reminded us that Islam is a religion of peace. He said to us that we are going to get those people responsible for the terrorism they perpetrated. 

We wondered which people was he referring to

President Barack Hussein Obama also told us that Islam is a religion of peace, and he should know--he knows everything, just ask him. He said the ISIS is neither Islamic nor is it a state. 

We wonder why they quote the Koran and call themselves Islamic. What religion is it that shares the same name, we wonder.

If only we could have gotten more information on Faisal Mohammad, we might have been able to get to the bottom, the root cause, as to why this fine young man wanted to kill strangers, whose only common denominator was that they were not Muslims. 

If only we had more information, we might better understand what all the terrorism is about. Why do they insist on saying that they are Islamic?

The findings from the probe of the November 4, 2015 attack at the Merced campus were inconclusive. Neither local nor federal law enforcement could not come up with what motivated Faisal Mohammad to attack people indiscriminately. 

Was it terrorism, or was it just a kid out for a walk? What difference does it make to know the answer?

"Every indication is that Mohammad acted on his own; however, it may never be possible to definitively determine why he chose to attack people on the UC Merced campus," the FBI's Sacramento office said in a statement. 

One possible conclusion is that we have idiots leading the FBI, but perhaps they have to play the PC game because this administration insists upon it. But then, so did the Bush administration.

It seems that people in power, from presidents to law enforcement to government officials, will do excruciatingly painful verbal contortions to avoid the obvious. You'd think they'd pull a muscle in their tongues.

And what doesn't make us stronger, will eventually make us dead.




Tweet

It's not terrorism, just a little kerfuffle

The left refuses to connect the dots, but since when is that news?

Last month, when Faisal Mohammad, 18, stabbed four students at the University of California--Merced, that ended when campus police sent him to get laid by 72 virgins, the media blamed the jihadist's anger on a video the fact that he had been banished from a study group. In spite of the fact that he had a photocopy of an ISIS flag and a manifesto instructing himself to "praise Allah," local and federal authorities still claim it had nothing to do with Islam and the banishment from the group was the cause.

Hillary Clinton smiled when she heard that, I suspect.

It's amazing how many ordinary, peace-loving Christians and Jews lose all their senses and go on stabbing sprees when the club they belong to discontinues their membership. Why are we blaming a sweet Muslim kid just because he has an ISIS flag and has to remind himself to praise the moon god? 

Just because his roommate, Ali Tarek Elshekh, a Muslim himself, said of young Faisal  "He was a loner and an extreme Muslim," and also said "that Mohammad was "way out there"  is no reason to believe that he was an extreme, radicalized Muslim.

Elshekh told sheriffs that his friend asked Mohammad what would he do if he touched Mohammad's prayer mat. The response he got from Mohammad was in no way unusual or anything to be concerned about as it wasn't out of the realm of a pure Muslim. Mohammad said: "I will kill you." 

No biggie. 

When authorities searched Mohammad's room, they found another copy of the manifesto in his garbage can, several discarded petroleum jelly cans, duct tape wrappers, large zip ties, a knife with sharpener, a red prayer rug people would die to touch, and of course, the Islamic War Manual, aka the Koran.

One thing is certain: this attack by Faisal Mohammad was no more a terrorist attack than the kerfuffle in San Bernadino or the World Trade Center. 

No wonder the media is losing its credibility among people who can actually discriminate news from political correctness. One day, they will all be out of business and America will awaken. 


Tweet

We're all like battered spouses of Islam

It's almost laughable, if it weren't so serious, how the media and the authorities haven't a clue as to the motive of 18-year-old Faisal Mohammad when he did his best to stab as many infidels as he could on the campus of the University of California--Merced last week.

He had a manifesto where he pledged to pray to Allah and behead one victim--the new "jihad cool" way to gain Allah's love.

In spite of the fact that the investigation is over, no family member came to claim Faisal's body, nor have they spoken to the public about his Muslim faith. But the media, including Fox News, seems perplexed about the motivation behind the attack.

The Merced County Sheriff, Vern Marnke, said "I met with the FBI Saturday night and turned over copies of all evidence we've collected to that agency and the UC Merced police department. As far as any further investigation into any outside influence, the FBI will be handling that from now on."

Luckily, Mohammad was not a very good jihadist--all of his intended victims will live: two students, a construction worker (who was quite heroic at the scene) and a female staff member. Yes, Mohammad was a screw-up for Allah. But more accurately, Mohammad was a screw-up for Mohammad, the so-called prophet of the religion of peace.

In the loser's backpack were two pages of handwritten notes, detailing his plans in a numbered order that was as confusing as the numbering of the chapters in the Koran in terms of the timeline when it was written by a scribe for the prophet of Islam, since he was illiterate.

If there is any doubt that this was an Islam-motivated attack, think again. As per Sheriff Warnke, Faisal's notes read:  "No. 27 'make sure people are tied down.' No. 28 was 'sit down and praise Allah.' Warnke added, "I remember seeing four or five times, scribbled on the side of the two page manifesto, where he wrote something like 'praise Allah.' There was a gruesome statement he made about wanting to cut someone's head off."

And even after all this, law enforcement thinks this guy was not radicalized. They think it had to do with him being kicked out of a study group, where a girl rejected Faisal's advances and her boyfriend kicked him out of the group.

Okay, this was quite likely what triggered the violence, but it was merely the catalyst to the underlying permission his religion gives him to attack infidels. The real problem is, we, as a society, tend to act like a battered spouse and pretend it's our fault.


Tweet

72 virgins is a lot for one guy

The young man who stabbed four people (or maybe five, depending on where you get your news) at the University of California, Merced, has finally been identified. He is 18-year-old Muslim student, Faisal Mohammad of Santa Clara.

Authorities do not have a single clue as to the reason this young Muslim man went on an infidel stabbing spree. The New York Daily News referred to Mr. Mohammad as "The deranged 18-year-old student . . . "

Yes, he was deranged, if you agree that Islam is a deranged religion that teaches hatred of Jews, Christians, gays, and just about everyone who isn't Muslim, or the same sect of Muslim they happen to be.

Mohammad equipped himself with a 10-inch hunting knife and zip ties, duct tape, two plastic baggies of petroleum jelly, a night vision scope, a hammer and a bomb-making component in his backpack. Aside from having terrorist paraphernalia, he has no known ties to any terrorist organizations and his neighbors probably describe him as "a nice boy--very quiet and quick to give a helping hand to his neighbors."

Why is it always the nice quiet ones?

Merced County Sheriff Vern Warnke said the petroleum jelly is "a poor man's C-4," which is a type of plastic explosive.

The idiot Chancellor of the school Leland said in a statement, "Based on the evidence gathered so far, we have no reason to believe that this was in any way related to terrorism." Ms. Leland added that Mohammad appeared to be motivated by personal animosities, not a political agenda."

The FBI did a background check on Mohammad and his family and were unable to discover how his religion may have been involved in this jihad attack on people he evidently did not know personally (in order to have a personal animosity against them). 

"Dang if I knowd why he done it"

They could not find any connections to organized hate groups, because they failed to recognize the biggest organized hate group is Islam in its extreme.

Disclaimer: Not all Muslims are terrorists, but a hell of a lot of terrorists are Muslim.

Sheriff Warnke said "We had zero to indicate he was on anyone's radar," and added that the ISIS tweets that followed the attack was to instill panic.

As Mohammad began his jihadist attack, he had a smile on his face. It is very possible the smile indicated that he was envisioning 72 brown-eyed virgins who never grow old and somehow never lose their virginity.

Byron Price, 31, a construction worker was able to distract Mohammad and keep him from killing an infidel student. Price too was stabbed, but all victims, save Mohammad, are expected to make a full recovery. He was killed on campus by campus security.

Mohammad is expected to be a busy little heavenly porn star now.


Tweet

When knives are outlawed, only--you know

Illegal cutlery, the real problem 

A suspect went on a stabbing spree at the University of California, Merced and stabbed 5 people with an unlicensed knife.

"He had an illegal knife, we had legal handguns and took him out," said Sgt. Lester Drivelmore," of the Merced PD. "We didn't care if he was white, black, purple, gay, straight, Christian, Muslim, Jew or Jain. We did what we had to do to stop him from stabbing others," Drivelmore added. "And we'd do it again."

Two of the victims were taken by chopper to hospitals for treatment of their wounds, Pat Dellaraccatakkapoulis said. Pat is a spokesperson for the school and was visibly upset when speaking to reporters.

Three of the remaining victims were treated locally and all are expected to recover.

One student who didn't want to give his or her name due to the fact he or she was cutting class said he or she knew something was wrong when he or she heard a gunshot. "I was like, you know, listening to some Beiber when I hear this gunshot. It just went BANG! and I freaked. It was like, how can I say . . . scary, but cops got here fast and so did other first responders. Look, I better go--I got sociology in five minutes."

But before he or she left this reporter he or she said: "You see this kinda stuff all over the news and stuff, and you see it happen to all those other schools, but you don't ever expect that kinda crap to happen at your school, right? No way."

The stabbing spree occurred at around 8 a.m. local time in the Classroom and Office Building, according to KCRA.com.

The suspect, whose name was not released, was reportedly apprehended and is scheduled to be charged with a nonviolent crime and released by the Obama administration in the near future. Other reports (particularly by Fox News) say that the suspect was killed by police, and this just goes to show how confusing and crazy the media can be when a man with a knife go on a stabbing spree rather than a spree involving a gun.

Joe Cutter a spokesman for the NKA said, "It's very obvious that this was a knife illegally obtained by the deranged perpetrator. We don't condone illegal knives anymore than the AAA condones illegal automobiles. When knives are outlawed, only outlaws will drive illegal automobiles with illegal knives at their side."

Mr. Cutter will be appearing on "Hannity"a to discuss responsible knife ownership to Sean, who says that he has been using knives since he was 12 and is quite adept at the art.


Tweet