Anti-Semite Afrikaner refugee, Chari Kleinhaus's posts show up on social media

Charl Kleinhaus, one of 59 Afrikaners granted refugee status under President Trump’s administration, has found himself at the epicenter of a storm, entirely of his own making. His arrival at Washington Dulles International Airport on May 12, alongside fellow White South Africans, was meant to signal a new chapter. Instead, it has been eclipsed by a series of vile X posts, unearthed this week, that lay bare his apparent anti-Semitism and a troubling affinity for inflammatory rhetoric about immigrants.

The Guardian reported that in 2023, Kleinhaus, a 46-year-old farmer from South Africa’s Mpumalanga Province, declared on X that Jewish people were “untrustworthy and a dangerous group.” One has to wonder if this cretin actually ever met a Jew.

Not content with this, he later re-posted a white nationalist YouTube video in the fall of 2024—since scrubbed from the platform—titled: “‘We’ll shoot ILLEGAL Immigrants!’ – Poland’s Illegal Islamic Immigrant Solution,” adorned with clapping emojis. 

Other posts peddled the conspiracy that white South Africans face systematic persecution, a narrative eagerly amplified by Trump and his far-right acolytes.

When pressed by the BBC on Thursday, Kleinhaus admitted ownership of the account spewing this crap. He denied anti-Semitism, claiming one post was cribbed from another user and written under the fog of morphine for medical treatment, This is hardly an exculpatory defense. 

Attempting to justify his 2023 screed against Jews, he pointed to an unverified video [likely staged because Jews don't normally act this way] allegedly showing Jewish individuals spitting at Christians in Israel, insisting his words were not aimed at Jews as a whole. “Even now, if I see any person going against my religion, I will speak up against it,” he declared, as though this somehow absolves the venom about the entire group.

The broader context of Kleinhaus’s flight to America is no less contentious. He and his fellow Afrikaners were admitted under a Trump executive order, citing “unjust racial discrimination” in South Africa, a claim Pretoria roundly rejects. This followed the January signing of the Expropriation Act by President Cyril Ramaphosa, which permits the state to seize unused or privately owned land without compensation when deemed “equitable and in the public interest.” 

The law, South Africa insists, has yet to be enforced, but its intent is clear: to redress the grotesque land disparities rooted in apartheid’s legacy. As NBC News noted, white South Africans, a mere 7.3% of the population, own 72% of farms and agricultural holdings, while Black South Africans, over 81%, hold just 4%.

Kleinhaus claims personal victimhood, alleging anti-Afrikaner sentiment manifested in damaged farm equipment, unresponsive police, and death threats via WhatsApp—one chillingly stating, “’We’ll get rid of you, you’re on my land.’” 

Yet the historical weight cannot be ignored. Afrikaners, who enforced apartheid’s brutal regime until 1994, still command a disproportionate share of South Africa’s prime farmland. Kleinhaus, while acknowledging the injustices Black South Africans endured, pleads innocence: he had “nothing to do with apartheid.” 

But history is not so easily shrugged off.

Kleinhaus’s defenders might argue he is a man caught in a crucible, driven to extremes by fear and loss. Yet his words betray a darker impulse that aligns not with victimhood but with the rancid ideologies that thrive in the shadows of grievance. 

To spew anti-Semitic tropes and cheer xenophobic violence is not the act of a beleaguered farmer but of a man who has chosen to embrace division over reason. South Africa’s land question is fraught, its wounds raw. 

But Kleinhaus’s response—lashing out at Jews, immigrants, and imagined conspiracies—does nothing to heal. It merely poisons the well further.

Did we make a mistake accepting this person?

If you enjoy my blog, feel free to toss a virtual coffee my way on Buy Me a Coffee – it’s like a high-five with caffeine, and coffee keeps me focused. No pressure, it's your call

Tweet

Hamas praises Ireland's anti-Semitism

The Jew-hating terrorist group Hamas has welcomed Ireland’s decision to formally join South Africa's genocide case against the Jewish State at the oxymoronically named International Court of Justice (ICJ) and called on other countries to follow Ireland's lead.

“We urge all countries to intensify any pressure against the Israeli enemy to stop its brutal attacks on the Palestinian people,” Hamas said in a statement to Lebanon’s Al-Manar TV, according to Iranian state-run media.

The expression of support came after Irish Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Micheal Martin said on Wednesday that he had received the government's approval to intervene in the case against Israel.

"By legally intervening in South Africa's case, Ireland will be asking the ICJ to broaden its interpretation of what constitutes the commission of genocide by a state," Ireland's Foreign Affairs Department said in a statement. "We are concerned that a very narrow interpretation of what constitutes genocide leads to a culture of impunity in which the protection of civilians is minimized."

The statement claimed that there has been "a collective punishment of the Palestinian people through the intent and impact of military actions of Israel," adding, "Ireland's view of the [Genocide Convention] is broader and prioritizes the protection of civilian life."

Martin said last month that the government intended to join South Africa's case at the ICJ before the end of the year. His comment came on the same day that the Irish parliament passed a non-binding motion saying that "genocide is being perpetrated before our eyes by Israel in Gaza."

Since December, South Africa has been pursuing its case at the ICJ, accusing Israel of committing "state-led genocide" in its defensive war against Hamas in Gaza.

In January, the ICJ ruled there was "plausibility" to South Africa's claims that Palestinians had a right to be protected from genocide. However, the top UN court did not make a determination on the merits of South Africa's allegations — which Israel and its allies have described as baseless and may take years to get through the judicial process. Israeli officials have strongly condemned the ICJ proceedings, noting that the Jewish state is targeting terrorists who use civilians as human shields in its military campaign.

Pro-Israel advocates welcomed the ICJ ruling because it did not impose a unilateral ceasefire in Gaza and called for the release of the hostages taken by Hamas last Oct. 7. Rather than declare that Israel was committing genocide in Gaza and order the Jewish state to stop its military campaign in the Palestinian enclave, the court issued a more general directive that Israel must make sure it prevents acts of genocide.

In late October, South Africa filed the bulk of the relevant material to support its allegations.

Ireland has been among Europe's fiercest critics of Israel since Oct. 7 of last year, when Hamas-led Palestinian terrorists invaded the Jewish state from neighboring Gaza. The terrorists murdered 1,200 people, wounded thousands more, and abducted over 250 hostages in their rampage, the deadliest single-day massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. Israel responded with an ongoing military campaign in Hamas-ruled Gaza aimed at freeing the hostages and dismantling the terrorist group's military and governing capabilities.

Last month, Ireland accepted the appointment of a full Palestinian ambassador for the first time, confirming that Jilan Wahba Abdalmajid would step up from her current position as Palestinian head of mission to Ireland.

In May, Ireland officially recognized a Palestinian state, prompting outrage in Israel, which described the move as a "reward for terrorism." According to The Irish Times, Ireland is due to have its presence in Ramallah in the West Bank upgraded from a representative office to a full embassy.

Israel's Ambassador in Dublin Dana Erlich said at the time of Ireland's recognition of "Palestine" that Ireland was "not an honest broker" in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

More recently, Irish Prime Minister Simon Harris in October called on the European Union to "review its trade relations" with Israel after the Israeli parliament passed legislation banning the activities in the country of UNRWA, the United Nations agency responsible for Palestinian refugees, because of its ties to Hamas.

Recent anti-Israel actions in Ireland came shortly after the Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education (Impact-se), an Israeli education watchdog group, released a new report revealing Irish school textbooks have been filled with negative stereotypes and distortions of Israel, Judaism, and Jewish history.

Antisemitism in Ireland has become "blatant and obvious" in the wake of Hamas's Oct. 7 onslaught, according to Alan Shatter, a former member of parliament who served in the Irish cabinet between 2011 and 2014 as Minister for Justice, Equality and Defense.

Shatter told media outlet The Algemeiner in an interview earlier this year that Ireland has "evolved into the most hostile state towards Israel in the entire EU."

Two months ago, an Irish official, Dublin City Councilor Punam Rane, claimed during a council meeting that Jews and Israel control the US economy, arguing that is why Washington, DC does not oppose Israel's war against Hamas.

Tweet

Fetterman takes on "Squad" and progressives on migration and Israel

Now that Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) has apparently recovered from a stroke and still won his US Senate seat because Democrats will vote for anyone with a "D" party representation, it looks as if his brain is getting centered--at least some of his political views have gone that way.

Fetterman is even receiving praise from some on the right and criticism within his own leftist party, so it's obvious that his thinking is becoming more thoughtful, if that's a thing. 

He opposed some attempts by the leftists of the Democratic Party to make Israel, the victim in the October 7 barbaric slaughter the oppressors, and Hamassholes and the Gazans [but I repeat myself] the oppressed, or the victim freedom fighters, which justified the killing, mutilation, beheading and rape of Jews, including babies, mothers, and young women. 

But that isn't all folks. He even blew away the minds of those in his party regarding the immigration issue, and his criticism of New Jersey Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez, as Fox News reported. Menendez is facing federal charges for allegedly acting as a foreign agent and receiver of hundreds of thousands of dollars and a Mercedes as bribes to benefit the Egyptian government via his influence as a senator. [Democrats would support Genghis Khan if he was a Democrat.]

Fetterman also has a realistic view of Israel from which his progressive anti-Semites differ both in the House and Senate. He spoke at a leadership luncheon hosted by the Orthodox Union Advocacy Center in Washington, D.C. where he questioned why people who targeted Israel by demonstrations around the country and the world and why weren't they "protesting Hamas."

"They're blocking tunnels, they're blocking roads," Fetterman said. "Why? Why aren’t they protesting, ‘When will we get the hostages back home?’ Why aren’t they protesting Hamas? Why aren't they protesting systemic rape and torture of Israeli women and children?

"I don't get it."

I get it: it's now acceptable to hate on the Jews. And that's disgusting and sick.

Fetterman criticized South Africa, a devout anti-Semitic nation, for bring up a case of genocide against Israel in the oxymoronically named United Nations' International Court of Justice. He remarked that South African nation needs to focus on their own unrest and "sit this one out."

Referring to the rapes and atrocities Hamassholes committed against Israel, Fetterman said, "I have a 12-year-old daughter. If someone did that to my daughter, would you want me to sit down at a table and negotiate with them? Never. I would never ask for Israel to do that as well."

Fetterman said that Israel has the right to fully take on Hamas and noted that every Hamasshole that is killed is "one more step" toward peace.

Yes, Sen. John Fetterman's brain has made a full recovery it appears. While his political ideology isn't my cup of tea, he's at least making sense in a humane sense.

Tweet

15 randomly slaughtered in S. African bar by unknown gunmen

Fifteen South African people were killed and nine wounded in a bar in Johannesburg's Soweto township overnight when gunmen in a minibus began to "randomly" open fire at them. The injured were rushed to a local hospital.

Based on the number of spent cartridges found at the scene, all indications are that it was a group of people and it also seems that the massacre was planned out to some degree.

Gauteng province police commissioner Lt. Gen. Elias Mawela spoke out about the shooting.

“The primary investigation suggests that these people were enjoying themselves here, in a licensed tavern operating within the right hours,” Mawela said.

“All of a sudden they heard some gunshots, that is when people tried to run out of the tavern. We don’t have the full details at the moment of what is the motive, and why they were targeting these people.”

“You can see that a high caliber firearm was used and it was shooting randomly. You can see that every one of those people were struggling to get out of the tavern,” Mawela added.

He said the area where the shooting took place was dimly lit — making it difficult to find witnesses who could identify the suspects.

Rifles and a 9 mm pistol were used in the attack, said national police spokeswoman Col. Dimakatso Sello.
Authorities say gunmen began to fire “randomly” into the tavern.

But this isn't the first mass shooting at a tavern in South Africa of late. In a separate attack, four people were shot and killed by unknown gunmen in a tavern in Sweetwaters township in the city of Pietermaritzburg last Saturday night.

The police say in the earlier incident that two men entered the tavern and randomly opened fire at the patrons. Two died at the scene and two at the hospital.

There seems to be a pattern: bar/tavern, premeditated and planned random shootings, and alcohol at the scene. What could it be?

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

The pair of shootings do not appear to be linked, local police said, but I disagree. Could it possibly have something to do with Islamic terrorism? Boko Haram, perhaps? I wouldn't bet against that possibility, but I guess we'll have to wait and see.

Tweet

S. African MD who discovered omicron was 'pressured' into making the variant sound more frightening

Dr. Angelique Coetzee, the South African doctor who discovered Omicron, said she was "pressured" by other countries into describing the variant as worse than it really is. She was one of the first to report this new strain in November last year and described it as having "mild" symptoms for those in her country. 

But Dr. Coetzee said that she was told by politicians and scientists who are beholden to them from around the globe that her description was incorrect.

'Because of all of Covid's mutations, all of these scientists and politicians who aren't from South Africa were contacting me telling me I was wrong when I spoke out, that it was a serious disease … they were telling me I had no idea what I was talking about, they kept attacking me,' Dr Coetzee told The Daily Telegraph.

"In South Africa it is a lighter disease, but in Europe it has been a serious, serious illness, which is what the politicians want me to say.

"There has been a lot of pressure from European scientists and politicians who have said, 'Please don't say it is a mild illness.'"

Dr. Coetzee said those who had contracted Omicron in South Africa experienced much milder symptoms compared to the Delta strain and often fell ill with only a sore throat and fatigue. This didn't sit well with those who had been using COVID-19 as a tool for a power grab in their respective countries, so they kept the pressure up.

"They are accusing me of lying, of downplaying Omicron because of how it has been in Europe … in their minds, it is impossible for a disease with more than 38 mutations to be mild," she said.

Dr Coetzee, who is also the chair of the South African Medical Association, explained that Omicron was more serious for the unvaccinated, but  mild for the majority of those who caught it.

She said she couldn't understand why politicians wouldn't listen to her, despite her seeing the effects first hand. As a doctor and not a politician, she misses the motivation for people in power to use this "emergency" to their benefit.

NSW Chief Health Officer Kerry Chant had echoed Dr Coetzee's statements when the state saw a surge in Omicron cases.

She said that based on evidence from overseas as well as in Australia, hospitalizations from the variant were a lot less common than they were from the Delta strain BECAUSE OMICRON IS MUCH LESS SEVERE THAN THE DELTA STRAIN.

* * *

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

* * *

'It indicates that infection with Omicron is likely to be milder than infection with Delta, with the risk of hospitalization being around 60 per cent to 80 per cent less than for Delta,' Dr Chant said in December.

This was despite Omicron making up for 80 per cent of cases around NSW at the time.

And while it is yet to be proved, Omicron may be the magic bullet to inoculate us against the more virulent strains of COVID-19, but that doesn't sit well with the pro-mandate crowd.

Tweet

Deadly racism in S. Africa against white people

Cyril Ramaphosa [his surname means: "sex with a butterfly"] was elected earlier this year and has committed his African National Congress (ANC) to forcibly taking back land that has been worked and cultivated by white farmers.

ANC chairman Gwede Mantashe [his surname means: "an incredibly full mustache"] said last week, causing panic: "You shouldn't own more than 25,000 acres of land.

"Therefore if you own more, it should be taken without compensation. People who are privileged never give away privilege as a matter of a gift. And that is why we say, to give you the tools, revisit the constitution so that you have a legal tool to do it."

But the unions of both black and white farmers condemned the idea and predicted such a move would lead to job losses and possible starvation in S. Africa.

Omri van Zyl, head of the Agri SA union representing mostly white commercial farmers said: "The mood among our members is very solemn.

"They are confused about the lack of any apparent strategy from the government and many are panicking. So many farms are up for sale, more than we've ever had, but no one is buying."

Gee, I wonder why.

It makes you wish that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez would help solve the situation, being such an expert on government control of resources.

Of course the move will destroy property rights and deter investment.

In nearby Zimbabwe, there have been violent land seizures under the authorization of Robert Mugabe in the 1990s that sent the country into a nosedive from which it never recovered.

White farmers along with their families are being forced out, often in a casket, if there's enough remains to bury.

Practically speaking, about 20 percent of SA's farms produce 80 percent of the food that feeds millions of people in southern Africa and many of those farms will be affected by the acreage cap.

Even the National African Farmer's Union (Nafu), which represents black farmers, agreed the idea of kicking white farmers off from their larger farms, would lead to job losses.

But racists care little for the outcomes of their actions beyond the hatred they are able to inflict upon those who have less melanin. It's like the story of the scorpion and the frog except the scorpion cannot help itself.


Please consider following Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.


Tweet

Rachel Dolezal just won't quit, unfortunately

Like that embarrassing rash that keeps coming back below your waist, that has your doctor scratching his/head, Rachel "Call Me Black" Dolezal just keeps coming back. 

Now the white/black woman (I believe she still "identifies" as being a woman) whose knowledge of race is as anemic as Al Gore's knowledge of global warming, is on her (?) way to South Africa.

The mentally ill former NAACP white/black leader had been telling people she is black but in 2015 she was outed as white. Her excuse is that she "identifies" as black, and there is no such thing as race--so by her logic, there is no such thing as black.

Now Dolezal is headed to Africa to throw the bull in favor of a non-racial society.

"Race is a lie," the idiot told BBC. "How can I be accused of lying about a lie?" she asked, as she lied about a truth being a lie.

Dolezal; recently changed her caucasian name to Nkechi Amare Diallo (without the clicking of the tongue). On April 19th, she will speak at the first inaugural meeting of the group known as the Quest for Non Racial South Africa Society Dialogue

Many on social media and the South African press were not impressed.

"We don't need to be trolled like this," wrote Shandukani Mulaudzi, the engagement editor of HuffPost South Africa. She went on to say that Dolezal not only "bring[s] forth dangerous concepts on race, [but] she also propagates the denial of transgender identities and experiences."

One person tweeted: "When you think things can't possibly get any worse in South Africa, Rachel Dolezal happens."

Elle South Africa said that in general, "South African twitter is so not okay with it."

But the event's organizers told the BBC that Dolezal was "evidence of the myth of race." Which, of course, is pure bull manure and akin to saying that one determines what one's gender is by "identifying" as that gender; biology be damned.

Dolezal is a mentally ill person or a liar, and too stupid to know when she's gone too far.

Perhaps the DSM-V needs a new category called "Race Identity Disorder." 



Tweet