Being Black and being an anti-White racist is now the accepted norm of the abnormal left

Lamont Hill and his quizzical "say what" face

Racist activist, race hustler and host of Black News Tonight Marc Lamont Hill asked Chris Rufo, the outspoken critic of the nonfactual divisive, anti-American, anti-White garbage known as "critical race theory," why school children should not be taught that "whiteness" is "all negative," and then pressed Rufo to name something he likes about "being white."

“What do you like about being white?” Hill asked Rufo, after stating that “whiteness” is a “marker of power.” 

Rufo rejected the premise, noting that “whiteness” is “such an amorphous term, it’s like a census term.”

“You surely recognize that the world sees you as white, the world reads you as white,” Hill said, sounding like a true racist and noting that he likes the “culture norms” and “tradition” and other aspects of “being black.”

“If you’re saying whiteness is being constructed as negative and it shouldn’t be, name something positive that you like about being white,” Hill asked again.

Rufo again rejected the premise and pointed out progressive literature that’s being used in public schools which ascribes things like timeliness, objectivity, and rationality to being white. “These are very strange things to be ascribed to a racial identity,” he explained. “My view is that, actually, these things should be ascribed to every individual human being regardless of whatever racial category we impose on them.”

Lamont Hill was still unsatisfied. “That doesn’t answer the question,” he told Rufo, accusing him of setting up “straw men” to avoid the issue.

“If whiteness isn’t a negative thing, and there’s something that you actually — and whiteness actually shouldn’t be constructed as all negative, name something positive, that you believe is positive, about being white,” Lamont Hill told Rufo.

“Again,” Rufo refuted, “I don’t buy into the framework, that the world can be reduced into these metaphysical categories of whiteness and blackness. I think that’s wrong — I think we should look at people as individuals, I think we should celebrate different people’s accomplishments.”

“You mentioned [author Noel] Ignatiev,” Rufo continued. “Ignatiev says the goal is to ‘abolish the white race.’ In any other context, this would be interpreted as a near-genocidal slur. I don’t buy into it. The reason I’m not going to answer your question, is I reject that categorization. I think of myself as an individual human being with my own capabilities, and I would hope that we could both judge each other as individuals and come to common values on that basis.”

Lamont Hill closed the segment by saying schools “need” critical race theory so we can “expose whiteness,” listing off alleged systemic disadvantages black people in America are born into.

Now this is racist. All you need to do is interchange the races. Hill plays word games and Rufo is smart enough to not buy into it. 

“What do you like about being White?” I asked this question to anti- Critical Race Theory advocate Christopher Rufo. He stated that Whiteness was always only painted as negative, so I asked him to offer something different. Peep his response: pic.twitter.com/H5IkAyv2Co

— Marc Lamont Hill (@marclamonthill) May 26, 2021

I replied to Hill:

Hill is a bright guy for a racist so I suspect he will have a snappy answer to these types of questions. But when you attack a group's immutable characteristics, you really are nothing more than a racist. And you might recall how black people were saying that blacks cannot be racist because of all the things they've been through. That was just their attempt at shutting you up.

I'll say it again: Marc Lamont Hill is a racist, like Al Sharpton is a racist, Louis Farrakhan, Robert Byrd, George Wallace and David Duke. The only difference is melanin levels--even their political party affiliations are the same--all Democrats.

Is she going to do some kinda DNA test to assure she upholds this rule? https://t.co/9d7rXZTnCV

— Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) May 19, 2021

“It is unclear when such a practice was enacted and if it only applies to local reporters, particularly after her MSNBC appearance with Stephanie Ruhle on Monday,” Fox News reported. “During her MSNBC interview, Lightfoot told Ruhle she would ‘encourage’ Chicago residents to continue wearing masks despite the new CDC guidance allowing those with the coronavirus vaccine to go without them.”

“I know for me personally, I’m going to continue to wear a mask in public and I’m going to encourage others to do so,” Lightfoot told Ruhle. “We’ve got to make sure that people are continuing to follow the public health guidance that has gotten us this far, and masks, I think, are a big and important part of that.”

Lightfoot said on Tuesday afternoon that her decision to continue to encourage people to wear masks was not based on distrust of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

“But I think their guidance last week regarding masks has people confused…We need clarification,” Lightfoot said. “We still have a long way to go to hit the critical mass (of vaccinations) or herd immunity. I don’t want people to have false confidence.”

“To say, ‘If you’re vaccinated, you don’t have to wear a mask,’ that’s great. But what about all of the other people who are out there that aren’t vaccinated?” Lightfoot added. “There’s no way to know that. So I think for the time being, most people are gonna continue to wear masks outside of their homes.”

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Determines Who Interviews Her Based On Race, Local Reporters Claim

Please consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every ad you click on, you help in the fight against the China virus.

Tweet

Rashida Tlaib can't hide her anti-Semitism and hatred of Israel, but does she care?

Following her profanity-laced call for President Trump's impeachment and referring to him as a motherf**ker while her young son laughed after she said it, freshman Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) couldn't hide her anti-Semitism and hatred for Israel, nor does she intend to hide it based on the way she covered Israel on her office map with a post it with the word "Palestine" over the Jewish state.

The hateful Muslima claimed that Jewish legislators in the United States have a dual loyalty, saying of those on the Hill who voiced opposition to legislation that goes against the BDS movement [Boycott, Divest and Sanction Israel] they "forgot what country they represent."

Interesting. She places Palestine over Israel, a U.S. ally, on her map, and says that Jewish lawmakers forgot what country they represent. It's the other way around, toots. You are supposed to represent the United States, not the make believe land of Palestine.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), intimated that the legislation, [i.e., the anti-BDS bill] part of a package of bills related to Middle East policy, would be the first business the newly sworn in Senate would vote on. It would provide more leeway for state and local governments to refuse to do business with entities that have a policy of boycotting, divesting, and/or sanctioning our ally Israel.

There is a fair debate to be had about the balancing act between combating the BDS movement and free speech, though opponents of the legislation also have to grapple with the fact that existing laws prevent governments from contracting with businesses that engage in discriminatory practices, and the movement to boycott Israeli Jews certainly is discriminatory.

Democratic Senators Ben Cardin and Chris Van Hollen of Maryland tried to make a separate process argument against the bill, arguing that the Senate should not take up any business unrelated to ending the partial government shutdown. Their heads remain up in their nether regions.

But Tlaib obliterated that messaging strategy when she pulled out the anti-Semitic guns, saying advocates of the bill "forgot what country they represent." The idea of Jews as having divided loyalty, and of using their influence to convince others to act against the interests and principles of their own country, is an age-old anti-Semitic trope. 

Idiots used to say the same thing about Catholics--that they would have dual allegiances: the country and the pope. There is never a shortage of idiots and we elect them again and again.

Speaking of which, Tlaib supports the anti-Israel boycotts and also defended former CNN contributer Marc Lamont Hill after he was fired from the network for calling for the elimination of Israel and endorsing violence against Jews.

The Democratic Party has a festering anti-Semitism problem within its own ranks, and so far it seems content to look the other way and excuse the deployment of stereotypical attacks on Jews as long as they are thinly masked as mere criticism of Israel.

Even some of the Democratic secular Jews like Bernie Sanders and Chuck Schumer, have not pushed back against these attacks. And yet, their party continues to attack President Trump as a racist, while the proof is in the halal pudding. Bernie Sanders loves pudding.

It's a new year and the world still hasn't come to an end with President Trump in the White House, in spite of what the media and the left [but I repeat myself] would have you believe.

I hope that you will follow Brain Flushings throughout the year and feel free to comment on any issues of concern. Please subscribe and check out the sponsors on these pages too.

Tweet

CNN drops Marc Lamont Hill O' Beans

On Thursday, CNN announced that if finally fired commentator Marc Lamont Hill after he gave an anti-Semitic speech at the United Nations. Clearly he used phrases that are intimately tied to the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people.

But it isn't like CNN had no clue that Hill was an anti-Semitic crap weasel--he was buddies with another crap weasel, Louis Farrakhan, a schmuck who recently referred to Jews as "termites."

"Marc Lamont Hill is no longer under contract with CNN," a spokesperson for the cable network told Fox News. But the fact that they kept him on for as long as they had is a testament to the problems facing the left.

Hill had come under criticism for his remarks during a Wednesday meeting of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People in observance of the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People. He accused the Israeli government of “normalizing settler colonialism" and called for a "free Palestine from the river to the sea," a remark that got applause from participating diplomats many of whom are from highly anti-Semitic countries.

At one point, Hill poured himself some water and told participants that he just got off a flight from “Palestine” and that “I was boycotting the Israeli water so I was unable to quench my thirst.”

“If we are standing in solidarity with the Palestinian people, we must recognize the right of an occupied people to defend itself," Hill said in a portion of his speech comparing the Palestinian movement with the American civil-rights movement, which is total balderdash. " We must prioritize peace, but we must not romanticize or fetishize it."

Peace to people like Hill, comes when all the Jews are slaughtered and the world is cleansed, in their racist little minds.

On Thursday morning, Hill attempted to defend his remarks on Twitter. He wrote: "In my speech, I talked about the need to return to the pre-1967 borders, to give full rights to Palestinian citizens of Israel, and to allow right of return. No part of this is a call to destroy Israel. It’s absurd on its face."

He's a freaking liar.

Question: how many Palestinian Muslims comprise the total population of Israel?

Answer: about twenty percent.

Question: how many Jews comprise the total population of "Palestine?"

Answer: zero. There are no Jews in "Palestine" and if there were, they would have been killed. It's the same statistics for Muslim-dominated countries in term of the Jewish population. So don't be talking your crap, Hill.

By the way, if Israel returned to the pre-1967 borders, there would be no Israel. Israel had to defend itself from its neighbors and those borders were established from that defense of its right to exist.

Let's be very clear: the phrase: "from the river to the sea" is unquestionably used by numerous anti-Israel, Islamic groups, including Hamas. "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," is the chant and Hill knows it. 

Maybe he can get a job as Farrakhan's handmaiden.

Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and president of Human Rights Voices, told Fox News that Hill’s speech was an "especially obscene U.N. moment that reveals the true nature of the anti-Israel and anti-Jewish animus of the modern United Nations."

“Hill's call at the United Nations for the destruction of the Jewish state was not some accident," Bayefsky added. "He didn't misspeak. He was an invited guest. He was the only person invited to speak as 'the' representative of 'civil society.' When he ended his extraordinary tirade with 'Give us a free Palestine from the river to the sea' his words were met by a round of applause. The only applause for any speaker."

And those hands that clapped for his claptrap were halal.

In addition to Hill having been a CNN a-hole, he is also a professor of media studies and urban education at Temple University in Philadelphia and previously taught at Morehouse College in Atlanta and Columbia University in New York. The latter school receives money from the Saudis.

In a statement, Temple spokesman Brandon Lausch said Hill "does not represent Temple University and his views are his own. However, we acknowledge that he has a constitutionally protected right to express his opinion as a private citizen."

Yes, he does have a constitutionally protected right to say whatever crap he wants to spout, but Temple University has the legal right to fire his anti-Semitic ass. If they don't, that should tell you something about the school.


Hello fellow conservatives. Please click the "Follow" button in the margin to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, if you would visit the ads on this page it helps the economy grow and it does a world of good for me.



Tweet

CNN commentator calls for elimination of Israel, endorses violence

Comedy News Network [CNN] leftist commentator Marc Lamont Hill defended a stance of using violence against Israel and apparently called for its destruction on Wednesday while speaking to the United Nations.

The schmuck made the remarks to the U.N.'s International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, as first reported by Arutz Sheva.

"Contrary to western mythology, black resistance to American apartheid did not come purely through Gandhi and non-violence," Hill said. "Rather, slave revolts, self-defense, and tactics otherwise divergent from Dr. King or Mahatma Gandhi were equally important to preserving safety and attaining freedom."

Sounds as if violence sits well with Hill.

"If we are in true solidarity, we must allow the Palestinian people the same range of opportunity and political possibility. We must recognize the right of an occupied people to defend themselves," Hill continued. "We must prioritize peace, but we must not romanticize or fetishize it. We must advocate and promote non-violence at every opportunity, but cannot endorse narrow politics of respectability that shames Palestinians for resisting, for refusing to do nothing in the face of state violence and ethnic cleansing."

Hill concluded by saying that justice requires a "Free Palestine from the River to the Sea." The Hamasshole call for the destruction of the Jewish State [my italics].

According to multiple reports (here, here, and here), the phrase "Free Palestine from the River to the Sea" is a phrase that is commonly used by those who believe that Israel should be eliminated.

Philip Klein at the Washington Examiner, noted that Hill has a long history of anti-Semitism. Hill hates Israel so much that he revealed during his speech at the U.N. that he refuses to drink their water. By extension, Hill is anti-Semitic and has been photographed with another notorious anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan, the darling of the left, and who has said that Hitler was "a very great man."

By the way, Farrakhan is still on Twitter in spite of his virulent anti-Semitic tweets. Others have been banned from the platform for simply saying a man is a man and a woman is a woman.

And the left calls us the science deniers.

Hello fellow conservatives. Please click the "Follow" button in the margin to get the latest Brain Flushings at a computer near you. Also, please visit the ads on this page because it helps the economy and me.

Tweet

CNN's true black person calls another a "mediocre Negro"

A true black man who is not mediocre

The Communist News Network's (CNN) analyst Marc Lamont Hill attacked a fellow panelist for not being on the black bandwagon and for his work with Donald Trump's National Diversity Coalition, calling him, Bruce LeVell, a "mediocre Negro" who's manipulated by Trump.

"I love Steve Harvey and I have respect for Steve Harvey and I think his intentions were appropriate, but my disagreement is the way in which he's being used by folk like Donald Trump," Hill said.

"They keep bringing up comedians and actors, athletes to represent black interests. It's demeaning, it's disrespectful, and it's condescending," he blathered. "Bring some people up there with expertise Donald Trump [like me, he meant] don't just bring up people to entertain."

Bruce LeVell, a member of Trump's diversity team responded, "You weren't even there . . . " Pastor Darryl Scott, Mike Cohen, they are in the process of bringing all types of people from all over the country, from all different backgrounds. Remember the diversity coalition where we reached out to all different types of people?"

"Yeah, it was a bunch of mediocre Negroes being dragged in front of TV as a photo-op for Donald Trump's exploitive campaign against black people. And you are an example of that," Hill inappropriately said.

The panel devolved into a shouting match typical of the character of CNN and "The Jerry Springer Show."

Hill, an expert on the Negro experience and America's "Black Go-To Guy" is a regular contributor for CNN and appears to be a closet racist--a term he often throws around.



Tweet