CNN's Lemon scared of former Trump aide Jason Miller

CNN's Don Lemon is kind of a jerk. But isn't that why he's on CNN in the first place?

The evening show host told former Trump aide and paid CNN contributor, Jason Miller, not to come on his show and lie to the American gullible (the only people who evidently watch his show). They were discussing the Robert Mueller investigation into the Russian probe involving the 2016 presidential campaign.

Lemon said it was a privilege to be on CNN, not a right. He cut off Miller's side of the debate because he didn't like what he was hearing and there apparently isn't a First Amendment clause in Miller's CNN contract.

This used to be what dictators did, now it's leftist fake news outlets like CNN. 

Evidently, Lemon isn't bright enough to counter an argument from the right, so he has to use Antifa tactics and shut the speaker up instead of coming up with countering facts to dispute the other guy.

CNN refuses to hear opposing viewpoints and a spokeswoman for Lemon said he refused [aka, too scared] to discuss his Antifa-like behavior.


Tweet

The four accusers of the Trumpocalypse

As Election Day draws nigh the Trump accusers crawl out of the woodwork with stories about being groped or kissed or fondled by the GOP presidential candidate and the stories become fodder for the cattle at The New York Times and other liberal rags.

No less than four women accused Trump of sexual assault. One woman, Jessica Leeds, 74, of New York, told the paper that he groped her on a flight over 30 years ago. He allegedly grabbed her breasts and tried to put his hand up her skirt. 

"He was like an octopus," Leeds claimed. "His hands were everywhere . . . It was an assault."

But she just sat there and didn't report it to the airline officials--that doesn't make sense.

Of course Trump's campaign dismissed the allegations as having to merit or truth and, of course, Trump attacked the New York Times as being on a vendetta against him. His attorneys called upon the parakeet cage liner to retract what they referred to as a "libelous article" and demanded an apology. 

Trump referred to the story as a "fabrication" Thursday on Twitter.

Jason Miller, Trump's campaign spokesman said in a statement: "For The New York Times to launch a completely false, coordinated character assassination against Mr. Trump on a topic like this is dangerous. To reach back decades in an attempt to smear Mr. Trump trivializes sexual assault, and it sets a new low for where the media is willing to go in its efforts to determine this election."

Another alleged victim of Trump's libido, Rachel Crooks, told the emergency toilet paper substitute Times that the real estate mogul "kissed me directly on the mouth" after introducing himself to her outside an elevator in Trump Tower in 2005.

"It was so inappropriate," she said. "I was so upset that he thought I was so insignificant that he could to that." And she waited until he ran for president before telling the story. Makes perfect sense--bide your time and hope that one day the guy would run for president, then boy oh boy, will you show him.

On Wednesday evening, the Palm Beach Post published a claim by a Florida woman, Mindy McGillivray, 36, that the Donald groped her during a concert at his Mar-a-Lago estate back in January 2003. Like the lady on the plane, she "chose to stay quiet" and did not report the incident to authorities or even a local newspaper. 

In fact, this is the first we're hearing of it.

Trump's press secretary Hope Hicks told the Post that there was "no truth" to McGillivray's story.

What are the chances that all of these women all suddenly appeared right before the election? 

Another alleged victim, Natasha Stoynoff of People Magazine also published a story Wednesday about her own "encounter" with Trump in 2005 when she interviewed him and Melania in Mar-a-Lago.

She claims that Trump showed her one "tremendous" room and alleged that he pinned her against the wall and "forcing his tongue down my throat."

A spokeswoman for Trump told the liberal magazine "This never happened. There is no merit or veracity to this fabricated story."

Hillary Clinton has said that women who allege sexual assault should be believed. So if we are to believe this from Donald Trump, we should believe the women who were sexually assaulted and/or raped by Bill Clinton and Hypocritical Hillary attacking them for their claims.

I don't know if Trump is guilty as charged, but it doesn't ring true because of their failure to report the sexual misconduct at the time, as well as the coincidental timing of the reporting.




Tweet

Paul Ryan not a Donald cheerleader

GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump will not have Paul Ryan in his corner anymore in his bid for the presidency and the House Speaker suggested that he's expecting Hillary Clinton to be the next president.

The news comes after a 2005 audio tape was released revealing Trump talks like a lot of guys when women aren't around and they need something to brag about, bragging that he is able to grab and kiss women because he's a "star."

The Donald sort of apologized for these comments (probably not enough as I see it) and he had a reasonably good debate performance Sunday against Clinton. In spite of this, Ryan said that he will not campaign for Trump and according to anonymous sources, Ryan, along with other GOP leaders told others to "do what's best for you in your district."

This suggests Ryan's belief that Donald is toast and they need to abandon ship

If somehow Trump actually wins the election (which I doubt) Ryan will be in big trouble, as will be Hillary Clinton, who Trump says he'll prosecute if he wins.

Trump says that he will also build a wall at our border and Mexico will pay for it; use "extreme vetting" for Muslim immigrants; get rid of the national debt while in office; create millions of jobs; go after Aleppo's terrorists in Iraq; protect social security; establish justice; insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessing of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) called Republican leaders "cowards," and wanted to use the "p"- word Trump used on the audio tape, but thought better of it. 

Trump spokesman Jason Miller tweeted:

 Follow

Jason Miller 

✔@JasonMillerinDC

Re: today's Congressional call:

Nothing's changed. Mr. Trump’s campaign has always been powered by a grassroots movement, not Washington.

12:38 PM - 10 Oct 2016

 
•  1,1101,110 Retweets
 
•  2,1192,119 likes

Trump is not a Republican but he's the best choice of the two choices for Republicans.


Tweet

Liberal media ed boards go after Trump before debate

The once upon a time newspaper of record, The New York Times, and the other rag, Washington Post, attacked Donald Trump on the day of the first presidential debate. No longer providing journalistic coverage in an unbalanced way, both bird cage liners tried to make the case that Trump should not be president, but the shrill shrieking felon should.

Trump is gaining on Clinton in the polls and the liberals are worried that she will not be coronated as she is "supposed to be."

Rather than simply endorsing the self-serving "Queen of the Scream," The Times wrote an editorial entitled, "Why He Should Not Be President." It was an essay seeking to destroy Trump's claims about his assets as a leader and called him a "man far more consumed with himself than with the nation's well-being."

Rather than seeing the Democratic party candidate as a person who put her own "convenience" ahead of national security, or perhaps used her private email server to hide shady dealings with foreign donations and the Clinton Foundation, The Times is attacking the one quality that every person seeking the office of president must possess: ego/narcissism--that is, the belief that he or she is the one person who can best run the nation.

If Clinton put the needs of the country first, there would have been no private email server and there would be four Americans still alive who had died in Benghazi.

"Voters attracted by the force of the Trump personality should pause and take note of the precise qualities he exudes as an audaciously different politician: bluster, savage mockery of those who challenge him, degrading comments about women, mendacity, crude generalizations about nations and religions."

Bluster is not necessarily a bad thing. It shows strength and I suspect if Trump were president, Iran wouldn't be flexing their muscles in the Straits of Hormuz. 

Mockery is wrong. I agree with The Times on that issue. But that's who Trump is, and while it doesn't excuse schoolyard behavior, it was the one tool in his debate arsenal that worked for him, and that was his bottom line.

Degrading comments about women? What did he say and what was in his mind and heart when he said it? Nobody can know that. But liberals have always, always, always used the gender and race cards to win elections because their policies suck. They take away individual liberties to run a business, to speak freely.

And what Trump has said about nations is better than what Obama has said about ours--we are not only exceptional, but we are more exceptional than other nations. Obama doesn't see it that way and Hillary has taken millions of dollars from countries that treat women like possessions, while pretending to be for women's rights.

Nothing Trump has said about Islam was crude because the truth about Islam is that it is generally political with a tendency toward global violence. Anyone who denies that does so at their own peril.

So the Clinton campaign are trying to stack the deck for the debate. Hillary is short and Trump is tall--she wants a stool to gain height. 

She wants Lester Holt, the moderator for NBC, to do her job of fact-checking Trump, just like she wants her husband to run the economy for her as well, if she is elected.

Hillary is scared because Donald is catching up, and tonight might put him over the top if he doesn't blow it.

Which begs the question: will Monica Lewinsky be there?

The Washington Post said in its editorial that "the stakes could not be higher," and said that Trump has "amply demonstrated his unworthiness" to be president.

It's comforting to know that leftist newspapers are now determining who is and who is not worthy of being president. There was a time when it was up to the American voters to decide that .  .  .  especially those Americans who were legal citizens and were still alive.

Journalism was on life support, but unfortunately, it succumbed to the demands of the left.

Trump spokesman Jason Miller issued a statement entitled: "The Sun Also Rose In The East This Morning," in response to the editorials of both rags:

"The news that the ultra-liberal, elitist, out-of-touch New York Times Editorial Board endorsed an ultra-liberal, elitist, out-of-touch candidate in Hillary Clinton has to be some of the least surprising news ever. The New York Times' Editorial Board is the embodiment of the rigged system Donald Trump is running against."

Trump, as I've mentioned before, was not my first choice for the GOP nomination, but now that he's the only viable choice for the GOP, he has my vote.

Not only is Hillary Clinton not fit physically, morally and ethically, she has a record of proof that she is incompetent and shows extremely poor judgment based on that record.

I hope she has a coughing spell to prove one of the above points.


Tweet