Alexandria Obviously-Commie faces ethics investigation

AOC loves her some AOC

AOC loves her some AOC but things may have changed for the Capitol Hill darling of the far left. The House Ethics Committee is investigating the New York Democratic congress-commie. [H/T New York Post.]

The eight-member committee confirmed the investigation Wednesday but thus far has not provided details as to the nature of the investigation except to say that it has extended its looking into the matter that was brought to their attention on June 23 of this year.

The Latinx cha-cha chica was the focus of two complaints submitted to the Office of Congressional Ethics over her attendance at last year’s Met Gala in which she is picture above wearing an expensive white dress with the words "Tax the Rich" written on it in red.

Both complaints allege the socialist rep, 33, broke House rules by accepting free tickets to the star-studded, highly pretentious affair. Tickets for attendance was in the neighborhood of $35,000.

“The Committee notes that the mere fact of a referral or an extension, and the mandatory disclosure of such an extension and the name of the subject of the matter, does not itself indicate that any violation has occurred, or reflect any judgment on behalf of the Committee,” a statement read. But AOC had previously been the subject of two ethics complaints related to her attendance to the 2021 Met Gala.

Lawmakers are permitted, under chamber regulations, to accept free tickets to charity events directly from organizers. The New York Post has previously reported that she and her now-fiancé Riley Roberts were directly invited by the Metropolitan Museum of Art. 

But conservative groups allege that such allowances don't apply to this event since the invitations are controlled by Conde Nast, a for-profit company, and tables at the gala are also sponsored by corporate entities. AOC will likely claim ignorance about this issue, and when it comes to ignorance, she is totally believable, so nothing is likely to happen to her more than a light slap to her delicate Latinx wrist.

The American Accountability Foundation — the organization behind the initial ethics complaint filed against the congresswoman — claimed that Instagram “was able to purchase access to Representative Ocasio-Cortez that is unavailable to average citizens” by sponsoring a table at the gala.

The second ethics complaint was filed by the National Legal and Policy Center. It alleged that the borrowed Brother Vellies gown worn by AOC constituted an impermissible gift because it was “directly related to her ‘position with the House’ as a highly visible and controversial Member.”

“If AOC had not been a Member, she would not have been invited to the Gala,” the NLPC complaint read, “and even if she would have been invited as a private citizen, the designer would not have made a special dress for her to wear at the event.”

The irony is that the socialist message on the gown, "Tax the Rich" refers to and would directly effect the people who attended the gala, and the money that pays AOC's salary comes from taxpayers. 

Naturally, AOC's office issued a statement to the New York Post on Wednesday claiming she had done nothing wrong, but what else can they say.

Tweet

AOC and her obsequious boyfriend lecture us on how to talk to white folks on racism

AOC wearing her 'look at me, I'm intelligent'
eyeglasses

Socialist Rep. Alexandria Occasionally-Comatose (D-NY) and her current boyfriend, Riley Roberts, lectured white people about racism in an Instagram video, in a full-throated display of psychological projection.

Comatose, 30, [with a matching IQ], asked her man to provide viewers with tips for "combating racism," because leftists see racism everywhere they look and everything they think about. 

The toady said he thinks it's important to educate whitey on issues where they may not know they're being racist.

“It’s helpful and important to talk to other white people about racism, and I think a lot of people, they don’t want to be racist,” Roberts obediently explained. “They don’t think that they’re racist, but they also don’t know some of the things that they believe or say are and can be racist.”

It's kind of like being happy when you don't think that you're happy.

He continued, “I think one of the effective ways is just to talk and kind of help teach them about why some of the things they believe or say or think are wrong. [Especially if you say things the left disagrees with such as: 'I think we should end illegal immigration.'] Not necessarily racist, but that they are wrong and that will sort of, like, chip away and contribute to some development in this area.” 

Sort of, like, kind of.

Roberts acknowledged that this method wouldn’t “take someone from being a racist to not being a racist in one conversation,” but said it could be a good starting point and eventually, real racists, guys like David Duke and Richard Spencer, would see the error of their ways. Uh huh.

Comatose added that she believes it is important to “be open to learning about racist things that we may have said or done” in a setting that is judgment-free, in the spirit of how her party treated President Trump.

She said it would limit some of the defensiveness white people feel when they are confronted about racism every three to four seconds by leftist virtue-signalers.

Roberts, a startup consultant, began dating Comatose when they both attended Boston University and learned how racist everyone on the right is, and how they are better than them, in spite of the ethics complaint alleging AOC used her campaign to funnel money to Roberts, who is not a racist.

A complaint was also filed against AOC with the Office of Congressional Ethics after she allegedly gave Roberts an official mail.house.gov email address while maintaining that he did not work in the office.

But they will constantly lecture us about how all white people are racists.

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."--Shakespeare's Hamlet

Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.

Tweet

AOOC PO'ed with CBS for 2020 election coverage: not enough melanin

Alexandiarrhea Occasionally-Coherent-Cortex (Dummy--NY) slammed CBS for not having a black reporter or producer on their 2020 election team. Cortex tends to badmouth outlets who badmouth her, especially those that check her claims.

On Saturday  she went after CBS News’ 2020 election coverage plans, calling out the network for not including an African-American journalist on their 2020 Election Team. Oddly enough, she had no problem over the fact that they did not include Asian midget transgender individuals, or lesbians who identified as cis gender males.

The LGBTQsilentP community is hitting back at Cortex for her refusal to go all the way with her self-righteous indignation. The group's leader, Zzhms. Roger Linda Wilco, said of Cortex, "I don't know how she can sit there and say the things she says without taking the full picture into consideration. There are people out there who can't find work and could use a CBS gig. People of multi-color, multi-disabilities and multi-gender who have been trying to find a job and companies won't hire them due to their differences and inability to work with numbers. She should know--she doesn't work well with numbers either."

[The honorific Zzhms designates a white lesbian identifying as a cis gender black male with homosexual tendencies when eating at fast food restaurants.]

The controversy began when Ben F. Mitchell, a CBS News associate producer, tweeted, “It's Official: The @CBSNews 2020 Election Team has assembled!” on Friday.

The tweet also included a graphic with pictures and names of eight 2020 campaign reporters as well as four campaign associate producers, including Mitchell.

Late Saturday, Cortex retweeted the producer and called out his employer for not including an African-American in the group. [This was when the LGBTQsilentP's Roger Linda Wilco shot back with a tweet of ZZhms' own.]

Cortex tweeted:

“This [administration] has made having a functional understanding of race in America one of the most important core competencies for a political journalist to have, yet @CBSNews hasn’t assigned a *single* black journalist to cover the 2020 election. Unacceptable in 2019. Try again.”

Zzhms Wilco tweeted back:

"Oh yeah? Why is it you're dating Riley Roberts, a cis gender white guy? S'matter witchu--black chicks aren't good enough to get down wit?"

Cortex called President Donald Trump a racist last Sunday on CBS News’ “60 Minutes” program. She calls everyone a racist, but so do all Democrats.

White cis gender boyfriend of Cortex

CBS News’ PR department tweeted a press release minutes after Mitchell’s Tweet announcing the group.

“The News Division will increase political reporting across-the-board by expanding its political embed unit,” the press release read.

In separate responses to Cortex, National Journal Politics Editor Josh Kraushaar compared her to President Trump by calling her a "media scold" and noted that the group "looked racially diverse (at least based on last names), with the exception of lacking an African-American. If there aren’t strict racial quotas for every batch of hires, does it mean a company is racist?”

For Alexandiarrhea Occasionally Coherent-Cortex the answer is "yes," there should be racial and intersectional quotas. The exceptions would be Jews, straight white men, Republicans, and anyone working for Fox News [but not Shepard Smith--Cortex likes him].

However, the low-information former bartender did not take kindly to Kraushaar's response, joking that she should change her Twitter profile name to "Alexandria ‘looked racially diverse (at least based on last names)’ Ocasio-Cortez"

“Do you understand how fundamental the black experience is to American politics? And to American history?” the idiot Cortex tweeted. “One race isn’t substitutable for another. It doesn’t work like that.”

It should actually work on merit, and race not be a factor whatsoever. But socialists like AOOC and even CBS don't get it.

She added, “It’s not about “quotas.” It’s about understanding the country you’re living in.”

Of course it's about quotas. It's always been about quotas and has nothing to do with a person's ability to perform outstandingly.

The freshman congresswoman returned to her exchange with Kraushaar on Sunday, claiming that his comparison of her to Trump was a "false equivalence" by "diminishing Trump‘s 'enemy of the people' talk as 'scolding' & describing my call to hire a black journalist as the same thing."

Then she called him Hitler.

"I never called anyone racist, just inadequate," she added without seeing the irony in her statement. "Also never called for strict quotas, just having representation of one of the most fundamental voting blocs in the American electorate."

Voting bloc is the actual reason she panders to black people--she unwittingly outed herself--and that's what real racism looks like.

Will 2019 be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint? Let's hope so, because politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet