Not enough diversity at Dunkirk to suit Diversity Nazis

Photo: Beat Street

A movie by Christopher Nolan is being attacked because it is accurately portraying history, Heat Street reports.

Yes, rather than fallaciously depicting history the way the diversity Nazis would like it to be, Nolan's latest movie Dunkirk,  accurately recreates the defense and evacuation of Allied and British forces from Northern France during the start of World War II.  

The movie is set for release July 21st and stars Mark Rylance, Jack Lowden and Harry Styles, all white guys.

Racists have taken to social media saying they'll boycott the movie because it's "too white" like the huge majority of British and Allied forces at that time.
One tweeter twit, Yasmin Salahuddin (@iamfindingmeeno) tweeted:

"Dunkirk or: let's put all the attractive, white, British males in one movie."

With a name like 'Yasmin, she would evidently like to have more Middle Eastern men, blacks, Chinese and Hispanics in the flick, but that wasn't how it went down. But, on a positive note, she didn't insist they shout "Allahu Akbar" when they engaged the enemy.

At least she found the white guys attractive.

Another racist twit tweeted: 

"What comes to mind when I see the trailer for Dunkirk? A boring movie with a bunch of white dudes. #nothanks

        -Steph I Runs Trails (@stephrunstrails)

Most people actually don't care that Steph runs trails or anything about Steph's life, but evidently the first thing that strikes Steph about the trailer is the lack of diversity in the fighting at Dunkirk, history be damned.

Dumb Dolly tweeted: 

"Dunkirk: more proof Hollywood will never run out of movies about white guys doing stuff in WWII."

--Dolly (@loather) [a fitting sobriquet for her].

I guess this is just more proof that facts don't matter to liberals, and they need to invent an acceptable reality that fits their narrative.

The people who fought and those who died at Dunkirk were overwhelmingly white men. People whose first instinct is to address the lack of diversity where it didn't actually exist are the racists they claim others to be, and their need to twist the truth is offensive and harmful.


Tweet

Big Brother is watching British subjects who cause 'offense'

(Photo: Heat Street)

The Cheshire Constabulary is being criticized throughout England, the country that gave us the Magna Carta on June 15, 1215. The Brits are angry that the Constabulary threatened to jail people whose social media posts cause others to "take offense," as reported in Heat Street.

In a Facebook post the Cheshire Constabulary said that "a large fine of up to two years in prison" could be the punishment for what is perceived to be a controversial message on the site. 

Controversial? Who decides that?

This sounds like something the University of California at Berkeley came up with, but it's England and they want Facebook to be a safe space for anyone who can find something to take offense over, and that includes almost everyone one on the left.

George Orwell is rolling in his grave.

The Constabulary wrote: We would remind all social media users to think carefully about what they are saying before posting messages online. Although you may believe your message is acceptable, other people may take offense, and you could face a large fine or up to two years in prison if your message is deemed to have broken the law.

The Cheshire Constabulary contains about a million people in the northwest of England, covering areas outside of Liverpool and Manchester. That's a lot of people for Big Brother to control.

The police later tried to walk it back from its original threat with a "clarification" that jail time and fines were only appropriate punishment for actual crimes, like inciting violence or racial hatred, rather than general "offense."

The dictators wrote: "These crimes are about more than just showing hostility to one person, but about stirring up hatred against a whole group of people, regardless of what platform you use."

The policing of speech has become an ever increasing issue/problem in UK policing. 

Some police forces have vastly expanded their definition of a "hate crime" over the past year to include women as a protected group--which is an insult to women.

Race, the disabled and religious minorities are also protected groups because the police evidently believe they can't fend for themselves.

The bigger question is: what authority decides the definition of a "hate crime?" Was it an elected official? 

Obviously, the Cheshire Constabulary does not see the importance of free speech and they don't understand what it means. Free speech is speech you don't like, which is why it must be defended legally. We don't need to defend speech we like.

Police in North Yorkshire and Nottinghamshire have made the change not to stop free speech but Cheshire has not implemented a new definition. But they're whining that they are victims of a misunderstanding and say they "recognize the importance of free speech."

"Unfortunately there has been a misunderstanding over our intention, which has led to a number of negative responses to the post.

"As a Constabulary, we would never tell people what they can or can't say, or what they can or can't think. [To even say that sentence is Big Brother banter.] We recognize the importance of free speech and actively encourage engagement and discussion on a range of issues through our social media channels.

"This post was issued specifically in response to those reports we received, and as a police force it is our responsibility to remind people that legislation exists prohibiting the incitement of hatred and violence. This applies to everyone regardless of age, gender, race or religion and we take all reports of this nature seriously, irrespective of who has made the comments."

And to this end, always remember, Big Brother is watching you.



Tweet

MSNBC may dump O'Donnell and Griffin

According to Heat Street the far left-leaning MSNBC may be getting rid of communist-leaning Lawrence O'Donnell and the President of the company Phil Griffin as their contracts are ending and they haven't been renewed.

The replacement? 

Brian "Even My Chin Leans Right" Williams--the guy who's been shot at, saw dead bodies floating down the street and the buddy of the big cheese, NBC News Chairman Andy Lack.

According to Heat Street, Lack may be looking to rehabilitate his buddy Williams and take credit for MSNBC's recent successes, which are at least partially due to the firing of Bill O'Reilly over at Fox News. 

O'Donnell, not a communist when it comes to his own salary, threw a tantrum on the air Wednesday tweeting á la Trump, "Contract expires June 4," and then said he will "let you know where you can watch me June 6 if it's not MSNBC. I'm sorry this situation has become public." 

If he's sorry, why then did he go public with it?

On Thursday, he confirmed to a fan that he tweeted that he wants to stay at MSNBC with "the best team mates [in this case, comrades] on TV."

If Lack rids the network of leftist O'Donnell, Heat Street says that it'll be the latest move by the elderly executive to "torpedo MSNBC's progressive hosts in favor of conservative or middle-of-the-road programming."

While O'Donnell may not be Lack's fav, many progressive snowflakes are expressing their support for O'Donnell on social media. They even used a petition calling for O'Donnell to keep his job while ridding the country of Trump's. The petition has garnered practically all of the viewership of the network--all 14,000 viewers signed.

Griffin, whose head may also be on the chopping block, has strong support from Rachel Maddow the annoying pseudo intellectual lesbian.

Conservatives ought to be crossing their fingers that Williams gets O'Donnell's slot. People see him as a phony and a self-promoting moron. But beyond that, liberals like that about him.

All we can do now is wait until June and hope for change.


Follow Brain Flushings by clicking the Follow tab in the margin.




Tweet

"Bill Nye the pseudoscience guy" episode censored

(Photo: Heat Street)

Bill Nye the "Pseudo Science Guy" has a Netflix series that doesn't let biological facts get in the way of his political agenda. 

In the show, he promotes the idea the gender [identity] and biological sex are on a spectrum, and are not simply male and female. This is in direct contrast of an older episode of "Bill Nye the Science Guy" in which he used actual biology to describe the two sexes.

Now the bow-tied actor in Bill Nye Changes the World (which should have been called "Bill Nye Changes the Facts") claims that gender is "more like a kaleidoscope." 

What a schmuck, albeit a rich one due to his total acquiescing to the LGBTQ+LSMFT community. 

Nye presents his "settled [pseudo]science" with mannequins, which is how he gets 6-year-olds interested in 'science.' He has XX and XY chromosomes projected onto the dummies and claims that "what makes someone male or female isn't so clear cut."

For phonies like Nye, nothing factual is clear cut. The "scientific Left would rather deal in  "Gender Lysenkoism" and deny the existence of only two biological sexes as they say "gender" is separate and distinct from sex and that there is a spectrum and a "social construct" that should be imposed upon the objective reality of others.

Nye's view on biological sex is the same view they're teaching in Gender Studies classes where actual biology is dismissed as "biological essentialism," and science can be shaped as you wish it to be.

No wonder Nye is the new hero on the political Left.

Now to what part of Nye's "science" show was censored.

Back in 1996, the "Bill Nye the Science Guy" had an episode called "Probability" in which he states that "[Chromosomes] control whether we become a boy or a girl." Ian Miles Cheong's tweet of this went viral and was discussed on Heat Street. 

Basically, Nye discussed actual biology and made no claim about fluidity of gender. He went with actual science and said that chromosomes determine the sex of the person. Sex chromosomes determine how a fertilized egg has a 50-50 chance of being either male or female.

"Inside each of ourselves are these things called chromosomes, and they control whether we become a boy or a girl," the narrator says. "There are only two possibilities: 'XX,' a girl, or 'XY,' a boy."

That was the segment cut from the show. Other than this cut, the rest of the episode was basically the same as the 1996 episode.

Netflix offered no reason why it was cut, and this seems to be the only episode that was tampered with at this time. 

But if another episode doesn't fulfill the PC police's requirements, this will not be the only episode to face the scissors of Big Brother.


Please follow Brain Flushings by clicking the Follow tab.

Tweet

Amy Schumer's verbal flatulence

Amy Schumer seems like the type of person who would fart in an elevator with one other person aboard and blame that person for the stink. Now she insists that in spite of the horrible reviews she received, people really like her new Netflix special.

She blames alt-right Internet trolls for the bad reviews of "The Leather Special" which debuted last week.

The so-called comic said the reviews that go from "Sucks" to "Really Sucks," aren't because her special is sub-par, but that it's due to a coordinated online effort to attack her.

Schumer also slammed "the 'journalists' who report on the activity of trolls as if it's news" and said that this is what the current administration wants.

It's good to know those journalists are supporting Trump--that's news to me.

"The alt right organized trolls attack everything I do," she whine. "They organize to get my ratings down."

Yes, the alt right has secret meetings along with Trump's press corps and plan attacks on Amy Schumer, because she is so important and they must stop her at all costs.

The paranoid 35-year-old narcissist said the alt right had organized similar protests against her book, TV show and movies. "I want to thank them," she lied. "It reminds me what I'm saying is effective and brings more interest to my work and their obsession with me keeps me going." [Not that it has anything to do with money.]

She also defended her joke-stealing: "Call me a thief and I will continue to rise and fight and lead. I know who I am," she bragged. 

As far as the crummy reviews she received from TV critics and the LA Times, she forgot to mention them.

Even liberal Newsday's TV critic gave her performance a "C" and said it was "too much" and "too carnal." The Detroit News said it was "funny but predictable," which usually makes something not so funny.

The joke-stealing is definitely not funny. 

Heat Street posted a YouTube video (shown here) showing how two of Schumer's bits are compared to old routines done by Dave Attell and Dave Chappelle--note their similarity and the fact that Schumer's bit was less funny than theirs.



Tweet

Bataclan: The mental illness of jihad

The ridiculous way we deal with terrorists

The French government has been suppressing information about what took place last November at the Bataclan, the Paris theatre designed in 1864 by Charles Duval.

You may recall the Eagles of Death Metal were playing and about a half hour or so into their rock performance gunmen entered the building and soon began firing at the crowd.

First the began shooting everyone by the bar, according to one witnesses Gregoire, Thomas and Nicolas told Liberation newspaper. The three were watching the concert from the balcony and saw movement in the crowd "like a gust of wind through wheat," as people understood what was happening and ran for their lives.

And that was basically the way the story was first reported in the press.

It is now known that the jihadists tortured, beheaded and disemboweled victims on the second floor of the club, proving once again that jihad is a license for the world's sociopaths to use religion as a righteous excuse to express their illness.

The chief police witness in Parliament told of an investigating officer, tears streaming down his face, ran out of the Bataclan and vomited in front of him after seeing the disfigured bodies.

The testimony described how the Wahhabist murderers gouged out eyes, castrated victims, and shoved their testicles in their mouths. Apparently, they also disemboweled some of their victims. Women were stabbed in their genitals and the bastards filmed the carnage for Islamic State propaganda.

The medics did not release the bodies of torture victims to the families for these reasons.

But prosecutors claimed the reports of torture were merely "a rumor" and based it on the fact that sharp knives were not found at the scene. They even claimed that the injuries may have been caused by shrapnel.

In a HEAT STREET exclusive, it was revealed that the French government committee heard the  14-hour testimony that was suppressed by the government and not published online until this week.

At least the French didn't blame the reason for the attack on some video. After all, who'd believe that nonsense?

Just another government not trusting the people to handle the truth.

Tweet