According to Democrat's standards, Joe Biden is a racist

When white supremacist and former head of the Ku Klux Klan, David Duke, endorsed Donald Trump for President, the Democrats went berserk and claimed that the endorsement means that Trump is a racist. That is their standard--if a racist endorses you, that makes you a racist. I suppose if a vegan endorses you, it means you don't eat meat.

Well now, it seems like the jackboot is on the other foot.

The Democrat presidential nominee, Joseph Robinette Biden claims that he decided to run for the highest office in the land because of the white supremacists that demonstrated in the 2017 events in Charlottesville, VA and the way President Trump responded to the demonstration. 

Specifically, Biden claims that Trump said that there were "very fine people on both sides" meaning members of Antifa as well as the white supremacists were very fine people. 

This claim is not only false, it's disgusting and is a hoax that should disqualify anyone running for the presidency. It divides the nation and perpetuates a lie about the country's president. Trump was very clear in his next sentence to whom he was referring when he used the words "very fine people."

Biden stated in his decision to run:

"Charlottesville, Virginia is home to the author of one of the great documents in human history.

"Charlottesville is also home to a defining moment for this nation in the last few years. It was there on August of 2017 we saw Klansmen and white supremacists and neo-Nazis come out in the open, their crazed faces illuminated by torches, veins bulging, and bearing the fangs of racism. Chanting the same anti-Semitic bile heard across Europe in the ‘30s. And they were met by a courageous group of Americans, and a violent clash ensued and a brave young woman lost her life.

"And that’s when we heard the words from the president of the United States that stunned the world and shocked the conscience of this nation. He said there were 'some very fine people on both sides.' Very fine people on both sides?

"With those words, the president of the United States assigned a moral equivalence between those spreading hate and those with the courage to stand against it. And in that moment, I knew the threat to this nation was unlike any I had ever seen in my lifetime.

"I believe history will look back on four years of this president and all he embraces as an aberrant moment in time. But if we give Donald Trump eight years in the White House, he will forever and fundamentally alter the character of this nation — who we are — and I cannot stand by and watch that happen.

"The core values of this nation, our standing in the world, our very democracy, everything that has made America, America, is at stake.
That’s why today I’m announcing my candidacy for President of the United States."

Here is what Trump said:

"You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. ... I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. ... So you know what, it's fine. You're changing history. You're changing culture. And you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the White nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and White nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people. But you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats. You had a lot of bad people in the other group."

Biden lied about what Trump said, and it was a despicable lie. He claimed Trump called the neo-Nazis and white supremacists "very fine people" when he actually condemned them.

But here is the best part: Richard Spencer, who is accused in a lawsuit of being one of the organizers of the white supremacist rally and who attended the event, announced on Sunday night that he is voting for Biden.

Richard Spencer, the racist, is voting for Joe Biden. Spencer tweeted:

 “I plan to vote for Biden and a straight democratic ticket. It’s not based on ‘accelerationism’ or anything like that; the liberals are clearly more competent people.”

Ian Miles Cheong tweeted:

Biden has the white supremacist vote. pic.twitter.com/IWdthZdhj2
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) August 24, 2020

Spencer also tweeted out a photo of himself on a Biden graphic card that stated: “I’m On Team Joe!”

Dinesh D’Souza tweeted:

The poster boy for white supremacy—yes, the one the media falsely dubbed “alt-Right”—goes all in for Joe Biden and the Democrats. Still wondering which is the party of racism? pic.twitter.com/wiLeIPheRH
— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) August 24, 2020

Anyone on the Left who claims white supremacists are for Trump with nothing more than an old photo or anecdote to prove it must now contend with the fact that the poster boy of white supremacy, Richard Spencer, has announced he’s voting Biden & straight Democratic ticket
— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) August 23, 2020

So, by Democratic standards, Kamala Harris was right when she called out Biden as a racist. He has a racist voting for him and that should seal the deal for Democrats.

After all, it isn't like Biden never made racist comments, right?

Except for:

"If my opponent wins, they're gonna put y'all back in chains." 

"Unless we do something about this, our children are going to grow up in a jungle." 

"You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I'm not joking." 

"Poor kids are just as bright as white kids." 

"If you have a problem figuring out if you're for me or Trump, you ain't black." 

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean." 

“Unlike the African-American community, with notable exceptions, the Latino community is an incredibly diverse community.” 

“My Democratic colleagues don’t like me saying this, I think the two-party system is good for the South and good for the Negro, good for the black.” 

“And other than the fact that they still call me ‘boy,’ I don’t think they’ve, I think they’ve changed their mind a little bit.”

Spencer’s endorsement of Biden comes after Biden made so many racist remarks in the past and during his campaign.

It's settled science--Biden is a racist.


C'mon, man. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear.




Tweet

The POTUS 'Pardon-a-thon'

Most presidents wait until the end of their time in office before handing out pardons and commutation of sentences. President Trump seems to have made it part of his daily routine.

Okay, so I'm exaggerating somewhat, but let's face it, Trump appears to be make a show of pardoning felons and other miscreants on a regular basis and I'm not so sure they all deserve it.

The plenary power to grant pardons or reprieves are granted to the president by Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution and limited only to federal offenses. A pardon can't override the impeachment process, so even if the president was able to pardon him or herself, an impeachment would likely ensue. That has never happened before and it's still unclear if a self-pardon is actually permissible.

The first pardon Trump wrote was for Sheriff Joe Arpaio, of Maricopa County, Arizona, on August 25, 2017.  Arpaio was convicted of contempt of court and was awaiting sentencing.  Trump said of the sheriff that he "gave years of admirable service to our nation."

Arpaio is a staunch anti-illegal immigration advocate and got in trouble with the Obama administration for actually following the law. His pardon was, as Martha Stewart would say, "a good thing."

The second person Trump dealt with was to Sholom Rubashkin serving a 27-year sentence for bank fraud. Rubashkin, a father of ten, ran a family-owned kosher meat processing business. His indictment for bank fraud was viewed in  bi-partisan agreement as historically excessive.

Third was Kristian Saucier, the Navy machinist mate who, aboard the USS Alexandria submarine, took photos as mementos of his years aboard the vessel, which he served on from September 2007 to March 2012. His case is very similar to Hillary Clinton's in which classified material was mishandled, and Saucier, unlike Clinton, served 12 months in prison. He is currently suing the Obama administration for inequality of justice. Trump gets a "Martha Stewart" endorsement ['it's a good thing'] on this one as well.

Lewis "Scooter" Libby is the fourth person Trump dealt with. Libby was convicted of perjury regarding CIA officer Valerie Plame, and obstruction of justice. Libby  considered himself the target of unfair prosecution. His sentence was initially commuted by George W. Bush in July 2007 and President Trump gave Libby a total pardon on April 13, 2018.

Fifth in line was Jack Johnson,  the first black heavyweight champion in boxing. The pardon was given posthumously by Trump for Johnson's 1913 conviction for violating the Mann Act, which involved the illegal transport of women over state lines for "immoral" purposes. The pardon was issued on May 24, 2018. It was previously denied by the Obama administration because true to form, Obama did nothing positive for black people.

Dinesh D'Souza was the sixth to be pardoned by Trump on May 31, 2018. D'Souza is a conservative version of Michael Moore, except without the cow inside his stomach. He has made documentaries and written books which depict the left in less than glowing terms, and he was convicted of campaign finance violations to which he admitted [unlike Hillary Clinton's refusal of admitting personal responsibility for her devastating loss to Donald J. Trump for the presidency of the United States].

At the time of D'Souza's consideration for pardon, Trump was also considering pardoning Democrats Martha Stewart [speaking of the devil] and Rod Blagojevich--Stewart for lying to the FBI and "Blago" for being a scumwafer who tried to sell Obama's senate seat after he won the election.

I can abide by the Stewart pardon, but Blagojevich is questionable in my mind.

Finally, we have Alice Marie Johnson, a 63-year-old "grandmother" who has used that moniker to somehow project her innocence. It's easy to become a grandmother--just have kids and don't die before they have kids.

I have mixed feelings about Johnson.

She isn't an innocent bystander in her crime. She was doing some serious drug-deals and money laundering. The fact that her son was killed in a motorcycle accident doesn't seem a good enough excuse for dealing drugs.

And while she's hyped as being convicted of a "non-violent" crime, I believe that dealing drugs is a violent crime, but indirectly so.

Perhaps Trump was right to release her, but to have Kim Kardashian West as the spokesperson for her case is ridiculous. Just because people are famous, does not make them experts or even intelligent.

And wasn't it Trump who said that he wants to get tougher on drug dealers? He even spoke of the possibility of the death penalty.

President Trump needs to be careful not to make these pardons into a TV show. And certainly he needs to stop equating celebrity with expertise.

I think it would have been better for him to have followed the presidential tradition of waiting until the end of his term before going forward on pardons, but I also understand his need to "do something" in the present.

It's just my opinion--what's yours?


Tweet

NY Attorney General would prosecute prople twice for the same crime

So Trump pardoned Dinesh D'Souza on Thursday for his campaign finance violation, a crime that rarely ends up with a jail sentence, and Barbara Underwood of the New York State Attorney General's office has a cow.

Underwood immediately tweeted that they would like to pass a[n] unconstitutional state law to incarcerate those who had been pardoned for federal crimes, and when good old 'push comes to shove' they would be happy to violate the U.S. Constitution's prohibition on double jeopardy.

Proving once again that liberals are babies when it comes to not getting their way.

Here's the statement and tweet:

New York Attorney General

✔@NewYorkStateAG

First it was Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Then it was Scooter Libby.

Now it’s Dinesh D’Souza.

We can’t afford to wait to see who will be next. Lawmakers must act now to close New York’s double jeopardy loophole.

3:14 PM - May 31, 2018

• 5,434
• 4,199 people are talking about this

There is no loophole in the "double-jeopardy loophole," as she stated. You cannot be prosecuted twice for the same crime or jailed again for the same crime. The reason is to prevent political prosecution of those who have already been acquitted for a crime.

Basically, Underwood is now calling for jailing those she and her party doesn't like politically. Where is the "defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States" in all of this?

The attorney generals' office is supposed to be non-political but it's crystal clear that the New York State AG has been exposed for what she is--a political operative with radical biases that skirt the law.

Maybe Underwood needs to change her name to 'Undermine'.


Tweet