The Koran vs the Sears Catalog

I never think it's a good idea for anyone to desecrate the holy book of another's religion. I say this as a person who is not all that religious, but as one who believes we need to respect the beliefs of others, at least to some extent. I mean, I don't respect religious beliefs that say one must kill in its name, or behead those who don't believe, or kill those whose sexual preferences differ from mine, and so on. But I would never flush a Koran down a toilet nor burn it at a cozy campfire.

Of course, that doesn't mean that anyone has the right to kill someone who flushes a Koran down a toilet--that even goes for plumbers who have to deal with the mess after the job is done.  The Koran, like the Bible, is a book.  There is nothing sacred about the paper it is printed on.  The ink is regular ink, the paper is simply paper--it could be used for a Koran just as easily as it could serve as paper for a Sears catalog. And we all know what many a farmer has used the famous catalog for in the middle of the night in that little wooden room made for sitting.

Thinks his team is winning

But people have died over this paper, this ink, these words that were supposedly written by a god named Allah, the moon god married to the sun goddess, whose name was derived from pagans.  Innocent people were killed merely because to those barbarians, they represented those who desecrated the paper, the ink, whose words were seen as holy.

So what were some of these words that Muslims killed the innocent over?  Let's just look at a Sura, just for the, umm, fun of it.  But before I begin, I have a caveat for those new to Islam and the life of their prophet, Muhammad.  In order to best understand how the Koran is structured, we must understand that there really are two Korans--the Meccan and the Medina Korans.  

When Muhammad was in Mecca, he had only a handful of faithful followers, about 150 in total.  He stayed in Mecca and harassed the locals by making fun of their [Jewish] religion and those who were pagan as well.  He was told by the Jewish leaders to cool it but he refused. Over time, he was forced to leave and he and his pals saddled up their camels, grabbed their multiple wives, and headed out to Medina.  Eventually his merry band of loyal soldiers grew to over ten thousand.  They had the latest in ultra sharp beheading swords and knives and were the type of terrorists to lie in ambush to attack the caravans, kill the men and take their women along with the booty. 

So, in Mecca, when Muhammad was weak, the Koran was more tolerant of other religions.  But when he reached Medina and was strong, somehow Allah became more intolerant of anyone who would piss off Muhammad by refusing to fight and die for him and feed his narcissistic needs.  He killed those who refused to convert or bow to him, and he took more wives than Jimmy Carter's family had peanuts.  On Muhammad's orders, he also killed their young boys and committed debauchery among the widows of the slain.  Like Allah, Muhammad hated the Jews and Christians, and soon all unbelievers of Islam were his targets in one way or another.  

Muslims who would have you believe that Islam is a religion of peace will only use the Meccan Koran to quote from, while true Muslims know how the old is abrogated by the new, so the Medina Suras were the relevant ones, as far as they are concerned, and they negated the older, more peaceful Suras.  

What I never understood was how Muhammad could get away by claiming the Koran was the perfect word of Allah written before all time when, in fact, the Meccan Suras were imperfect and had to be abrogated by the newer, less softer side of Islam.   Could it be that Muhammad actually wrote the book himself with the help of someone who, unlike him, was not illiterate?

So here is that quote I mentioned that so many of our terrorist are fond to follow when beheading those with a different philosophy than theirs.  Sura 9:5 (also known as "Sura of the Sword"): 
"Then when the Sacred Months (the 1st, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islamic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mishrikun wherever you find them, and capture them and beseige them, and lie in wait for them in every ambush.  But if they repent and perform al-Salat and give Zakat (a tax they pay for the privilege of living longer) then leave their way free."


Interesting how many months of the year are sacred, and how Muslims pray five times a day. It's like Islam is all encompassing, taking up so much of one's life that it doesn't give one time to think and question it. In fact, Muslims who question Islam, or analyze the behavior of their pedophile leader, Muhammad, are quickly dispatched with a blow from their swift sword.


Next time you hear a mainstream media moron talk about Islamic extremism, don't believe it.  These Muslims are merely being religious. They are the Islamic orthodox. 

So, in summary, I would suggest to you that the Sears catalog is more peaceful than the Holy Koran.  Nowhere in the Sears catalog does it say that Jews are pigs and Christians are apes.  Nowhere does Sears advocate killing those people who go to Walmart or even JC Penney.

If you want a great read about modern day terrorism and suspense, my latest novel, Jihad Joe, is now available both in soft cover and as an Ebook--see the links below. 

click here for softcover Jihad Joe        

click here for ebook version  
 

Tweet

The Reverend Al Sharp Tongue

A man's word is his bond.  Fool me once, shame on you.  Oh, and speaking of fooling and fools, did you hear about Al Sharp Tongue's promise to the good people of Sanford, Florida, regarding Easter weekend?  He promised that he would "occupy" Sanford on behalf of the family of Trayvon Martin, the young man who was shot by George Zimmerman in an incident that is still not clear to the public.  Yes, the good Reverend said, "We're going to have a full blown occupation of Sanford with tents and everything [except showers] over Easter weekend until authorities either arrest George Zimmerman or arrest us for praying for his arrest."  The good reverend made this statement, not to PMSNBC, his network where he works as an unbiased journalist, but to ABC News, just two weeks prior to Easter.  But instead of living up to his word and actually doing what he said he would do, he chose to be in Harlem, NY, and appear on the Melissa Perry show and later at St. Lukes Baptist Church.  He figured he'd get more media exposure if he stayed in New York than by going to Sanford, and exposing himself to the public is apparently more important than keeping his word.

If Rev. Al could lie to Trayvon Martin's family along with the rally racists who were slated to attend the hate orgy, imagine how much he lies to people he tends to demean--white people come to mind, and Hispanics who the media now labels as "white Hispanics" in order to fit the mold of racism they pretend to stand up against.


Racism is one of the few things the left has left in its dirty little bag of tricks.  If you didn't vote for Obama in 2008, you were a racist.  If you wanted Herman Cain to win the GOP nomination, you were rooting for an "Uncle Tom."  It gets so confusing. 

Al Sharpton is just one example of the race baiters who keep the hatred going.  They were quiet for a while after our country elected a hope and change black man to the presidency.  Unfortunately, Obama turned out to be just as credible as Rev. Al and as duplicitous as Rev. Wright.  

If you want a great read about modern day terrorism and suspense, my latest novel, Jihad Joe, is now available both in soft cover and as an Ebook--see the links below. 

click here for softcover Jihad Joe      

click here for ebook version  

Tweet

Campaign Strategy In the Persian Gulf

We have just sent a second aircraft carrier, The USS Enterprise, to the Persian Gulf to join up with the USS Abraham Lincoln. It looks like we're flexing our muscles at Iran and letting them know that we aren't playing games, and if they intend to continue along the path of perdition, we aren't going to sit idly by and watch them prepare to destroy Israel.  At least that's the message the public is getting.  I believe there's another agenda, an unspoken plan by this administration, that is designed to keep Obama in power.  I also know how paranoid this makes me sound, but nevertheless, I believe Obama wants us to go to war with Iran because by doing so, he is almost certain to win re-election.

When America goes to war, the incumbent stays in office.  It is almost unheard of to elect a new president to take his place and Obama knows this.  He may not know the function of the Supreme Court, but he knows that he stands a better chance of ruining the country--I mean running the country--if we go to war with the Jew-hating nation of Iran.  I suspect he'll be torn between having to defend Israel and fight a people whose religious values he apparently seems to concur with--he may say he isn't a Muslim, but he has done nothing that a Muslim would not have done if a Muslim were president.  

I hope I'm wrong and that we don't go to war.  I hope Obama is a one-termer and rides off into the sunset of obscurity come November, disappearing somewhere in one of our 57 or 58 states of the union, taking his Obamacare with him.  But I worry that this isn't going to happen--Obama's plans are deeper, shared only with a few choice people, like his Russian friends, and I believe he is much more dangerous than we know.  

 

If you want a great read about modern day terrorism and suspense, my latest novel, Jihad Joe, is now available both in soft cover and as an Ebook--see the links below. 

click here for softcover Jihad Joe      

click here for ebook version  

Tweet

Our Constitutional Scholar in Chief

Obama’s backup lights and warning chirper are in danger of burning out since he had to walk back his attack of the Supreme Court while they are in the throes of ruling on the Constitutionality of Obamacare.  For a President to comment on a case while it is still pending, and to attempt to exert his authority over the nation’s judiciary, is unconscionable and an indication of just how scared he is of an overturning of the only legislation he put forth in his three plus years as President. 

 Jay Carney, his press secretary whose name adequately describes his specialty, said something to the effect that Obama is so brilliant as a Constitutional law professor, that when he speaks of the Constitution, only dogs can hear the real message. He then added that what Obama said was a shorthand resulting from his brilliance, and not ordinary English as it seemed to be to “ordinary Americans.” 

I wonder if Obama got some insider information as to the tentative outcome of the court’s decision.  Maybe one of the unelected Supreme Court judges let him know what the secret chatter was all about.  The one name that comes to mind is Elena Kagan, Obama’s right hand Obamacare insider who should have recused herself at the outset, but refused to do so. She may have let it slip—after all, she also had a lot at stake with the outcome.

In any case, I hope that Obama is not an example of law professors in our nation's universities.  I may not be a lawyer, but I know ignorance when I hear it. 

If you want a great read about modern day terrorism and suspense, my latest novel, Jihad Joe, is now available both in soft cover and as an Ebook--see the links below. 

Jihad Joe Soft Cover           

click here for ebook version   

Conservatweets ebook free download

 

Tweet

Our Unelected Justice Czars

Constitutional scholar, Barack Hussein Obama, is confident the Supreme Court will not take an unprecedented position of doing their job on ruling whether or not his socialistic Obamacare is Constitutional. After all, they aren't elected officials--they're more like czars, who have more power than most elected officials, and there is no justification for them to be in power--wait, never mind, they already are and were appointed by President Obama.  

The President seems to have judicial activism confused with judicial restraint, when it comes to the Supreme Court if they strike down a law designed by a sitting President.  Of course, in Mr. Obama's case, he is not actually a sitting President, he's more like a putting POTUS, spending more time on the links than many professional golfers, and ending up with a score similar to the federal deficit.  But he is a Constitutional scholar, and he must know more than the Founding Fathers what is or is not Constitutional.

Referring to Supreme Court justices as "unelected" is insulting to what the Founding Fathers intended when they designed the checks and balances of the government. By ensuring that they would not be elected but appointed by the President, and hold their appointments for life, there would be limited political influence in their findings and be better able of determining the Constitutionality of a bill in spite of who authored it--even a Constitutional scholar like Obama.

One thing I know is that a President who walks all over the US Constitution like Obama does, should have his unconstitutional bill defeated by the very justices he minimizes, insults and apparently fears.

If you want a great read about modern day terrorism and suspense, my latest novel, Jihad Joe, is now available both in soft cover and as an Ebook--see the links below. 

Jihad Joe Soft Cover           

click here for ebook version  

Conservatweets ebook free download

Tweet

If Trayvon Was White, Sharpton Would Be Broke

Toilet paper technology has come a long way since the days of using fallen maple leaves to help us with nature's work, yet in spite of this, we still have people like Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson, who deal with the same product, but have not made any advances in their alleged work: the ending of racism.  They have pulled out their dusty old bongos and started pounding out the beat of racism and hatred because that's what they have to do to stay relevant.

You can see Sharpton and Jackson standing solemnly behind the parents of assorted dead  murder victims, they looking appropriately sad, but they are silently pondering their next speech to stir up more anger amongst disenfranchised blacks. They are always calling for justice against the white man, even when the "man" isn't white as argued by their the old standards--but now they can redefine to suit their purpose.  And as long as white folk continue to feel guilty for being white, these two race-baiting clowns will continue to pull the strings of naive black supporters, and the racial issue will not be silenced as long as their is breath in their bodies.

It is a statistical fact that more white people are killed by blacks and more blacks are killed by blacks in this country.  Why aren't liberals like Sharpton and Jackson addressing this problem?  Easy answer--it doesn't pay for them to do so--literally.  The biggest downside I see to this situation is that Republicans are giving it oxygen by allowing it to become part of the discussion.  But one thing is clear to me--if Obama has done anything as President, it has been to divide this country and increase animosity amongst the people.

If you want to read about modern day terrorism and suspense, my latest novel, Jihad Joe, is now available both in soft cover and as an Ebook--see the links below. 

click here for softcover Jihad Joe      

click here for ebook version  

Tweet

But Can They Make You Eat It?

If Obamacare is deemed Constitutional, that means the government can make you purchase it and failure to do so will result in some form of punishment; likely a fine or some jail time. If the government can go that far, overturn the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, then some say they can make you buy anything they want you to buy.  They can make you buy broccoli, but can they make you eat it?

Probably.  I'm no politician (my parents raised me with moral values) but it seems to me that the government can only make you purchase something that supposedly has a value to you.  If they can make you purchase broccoli, they must be implying that broccoli is good for you and therefore you must eat it.

But how can they monitor whether or not you're actually eating it?  And what if it isn't broccoli but say,  strawberry rhubarb pie?  I personally do not like strawberry rhubarb pie--in fact, I dislike it to the point that I cannot swallow it without gagging, but if the government forces me to buy it, and thereby forces me to eat it, I may get sick.

The government has a plan for me if I get sick, however.  They want me to go to an Obamacare doctor for treatment. I suspect that Obamacare doctors do not enjoy being renumerated by a government system for the treatment they provide.  I have seen many physicians refuse to accept certain third party payments.  But when payment can only be made via third party, how good can it be?  There will be only one third party (which, mathematically seems to make it a 1/3 party, but I may be mistaken), and when there is only one provider for medical coverage, there will be no competition. With no competition, those with skin in the game don't have to worry about being outplayed as they kick the can down the road and do other things we hear liberals say when they go off cliche-ing.  And if Obamacare is supposed to be so great, why is Barry offering waivers to Democrat campaign supporters and his political cronies for people in their district?  Is it even remotely possible that the concept of Obamacare is not just unconstitutional and problematic because of the absence of healthy competition, but that it inherently sucks and is about as viable a solution to America's healthcare problem as death is to the population problem?

I don't know how the Supreme Court is voting on this issue, but I know in my heart that it is simply wrong to force someone to pay for something against their will. And don't tell me about Social Security--it isn't the same thing because it doesn't involve commerce.  I do know that if Obama gets re-elected for a second term, whatever he is planning with Russia, the Islamic world, and with Israel is going to come crashing down on our country and it will not be a good thing.

 

If you want to read about modern day terrorism and suspense, my latest novel, Jihad Joe, is now available both in soft cover and as an Ebook--see the links below. 

click here for softcover Jihad Joe        

click here for ebook version  

Tweet