Team Israel refuses to be intimidated and remains in cycling race

Imagine the absurdity of the situation unfolding in Spain, where the Israeli Premier Tech cycling team, competing in the Vuelta a España, found itself under siege, not by rival athletes, but by the sanctimonious posturing of pro-Palestinian protesters. 

On Wednesday, the team was pressed by race organizers to withdraw from this prestigious Grand Tour, one of the crown jewels of men's road cycling, because of demonstrations clogging the route in Bilbao, a city notorious for its anti-Israel fervor in a nation often deemed among Europe's most reflexively pro-Palestinian. The team's response was resolute and principled: "The team remains committed to continuing to compete in the Valletta. Any other course of action sets a dangerous precedent in cycling, not only for Israel Premier Tech, but for all teams."

What are we to make of this? The race director, Kika Garcia, in a moment of spineless capitulation, admitted on local radio that he had appealed to the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) to have the Israelis removed. "This was the most complicated day of the race. If no changes are made, the protests will continue," he bleated, as though the mere presence of Israeli athletes justified the chaos. "Right now, the participation of Israelis is mandatory and we need to protect everyone. We have informed the UCI of our opinion. I hope things will change." Change, in this context, is a euphemism for surrender; a groveling acquiescence to the mob.

The 11th stage in Bilbao was delayed by 19 minutes as demonstrators, brandishing Palestinian flags and anti-Israel placards, blocked the road. With 15 kilometers left, organizers truncated the stage by three kilometers, declaring no winner, citing fears that protests at the finish line might endanger riders. For the first time in the Vuelta's 80-year history, a stage was cut short. 

This is not mere disruption; it is sabotage, dressed up as moral righteousness.

Tom Pidcock, one of the race's leading contenders, captured the frustration with understated dignity: "It was hard to describe the disappointment of the premature end," he said, believing he had a shot at stage victory. "But risking our lives is unacceptable. Protesting at the expense of our safety does not advance anyone’s cause." Here is a man who understands the stakes, not just of the race, but of the principle. To endanger athletes for political point-scoring is not activism; it is thuggery.

The protests were not confined to Bilbao. During Stage 5's team time trial, men and women stormed the road in front of the Israeli team. In Stage 10, they did so again, forcing riders to swerve or slow down. One, Simone Petilli, crashed as a result. His injuries were minor, but his plea on X was raw and human: "I understand that is not a good situation, but yesterday I crashed because of a protest on the road. Please, we are just cyclists and we are doing our job, but if it will continue like this our safety is not guaranteed anymore, and we feel in danger! We just want to race! Please."

The UCI, to its credit, condemned the protests, stating that the right to demonstrate cannot come "at the expense of the safety of the athletes. Echoing Petilli, they added that the racers "are not involved in political matters and are just doing their job." The Israeli team, meanwhile, expressed gratitude to "race organizers and the UCI for their continued support and cooperation, as well as the teams and riders who expressed their support publicly and privately, and of course, our fans."

Let's be clear: this is not about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, whatever one's views on that intractable mess. This is about the cowardice of allowing a sporting event to be held hostage by those who would rather see chaos than competition. To ask a team to withdraw because their presence offends a vocal minority is to hand a veto to the loudest, most disruptive voices. It is to say that merit, effort, and the right to compete can be nullified by the threat of a tantrum. If this precedent is set, no team--Israeli or otherwise--will be safe from the whims of any group with a flag and a grudge. 

That is not progress; it is regression into a world where might makes right, and the mob rules all. 

If you like my blog and want to Buy Me A Coffee, I wouldn't stop you--it supports my work and I really appreciate it. But no pressure.

Tweet

Man cyclist stopped from competing against women after they threatened boycott

Adams apple +XY chromosomes + lipstick = Man

A man who identifies as a woman is still not as fast as a motorcycle who identifies as a bike--Confucius

A man has been ruled ineligible to compete in a woman's championship cycling race in the UK mainly because the women [i.e., those born with a uterus and XX chromosomes] have threatened to boycott the event.

It's about freaking time! 

Sadly, it happened in the UK and not in the USA, where the same problem exists with men who are allowed to compete against women and dominate in sports of strength and speed.

A man named Zach Bridges, 21, changed his name to Emily, put on some lipstick and called himself a woman in 2020. Zach/Emily still has his twigs and berries, but was planning to win against the women in the National Omnium Championship in Derby, England. [The Brits pronounce it "Darby" for some reason.]

However, because Bridges is still registered as a man, the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) said he cannot compete against women until his registration as a male expires, USA Today reported Thursday. In other words, once his card as a male cyclist expires, he can be considered a woman. 

It's like if your library card expires, you can be considered illiterate. Makes perfect sense.

The UCI’s decision came after a number of female riders [you know, birthing people] discussed boycotting the event because of Bridges’ participation and unfair biological advantage, according to the Guardian.

What's wrong with those women? Are they science deniers? If a man says he identifies as a woman and lets his hair grow, maybe puts on some lipstick, wears a dress, shaves his hairy legs, adds a dab of perfume, that makes him a woman, right?

Actually, if he truly thinks he's a woman, that makes him gender dysphoric. Otherwise, he a narcissistic prick who wants to unfairly win a trophy and symbolically flip off the opposite sex. [Lia Thomas is the perfect example--he even admitted to a teammate in the locker room that he's still attracted to women.]

In 2018, Bridges had set a national junior men’s record over 25 miles. He was on the Great Britain Academy program as a male rider but was dropped in 2020, according to the Guardian.

He continued to race in men’s events after coming claiming to be a woman in 2020.

Bridges won the men’s points race at the British Universities championships in Glasgow just one month ago, USA Today reported.

He started hormone therapy last year to lower his testosterone levels and begin competing as a woman. But testosterone is merely part of the advantage men have over women in strength and speed sports. We have greater muscle mass, more fast-twitch muscles, bigger bone structure and greater overall strength even after testosterone is reduced.

British Cycling said in a statement Wednesday that it believes “transgender and non-binary people should be able to find a home, feel welcome and included, and be celebrated in our sport.” Why?

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

It isn't that we need to punish people with a mental diagnosis of gender dysphoria, but it is not fair to have biological men compete against biological women. By the way, you never really see biological women [transgender men] compete against men in sports. An exception might be in shooting and archery competitions, and other sports that don't require greater muscle strength. Let's remember the "Under 16" Soccer league that destroyed the USA Women's Soccer team where teenage boys beat the Olympian women.

We don't need a tyranny of a minority over the majority. We just need to be fair to each other and stop pretending victimhood.

Tweet