Rep. Elise Stefanik gets disgusting note on her car; the left responds predictably slimy

You might remember Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) and her intelligent and pointed questioning of national security aide Fiona Hill and David Holmes, our diplomat in Ukraine as they testified before the House Intelligence Committee on Nov. 21, 2019 in the public impeachment hearing of President Trump. She was magnificent.

For her efforts, Stefanik has become the latest target of leftist intolerance and hatred for anyone who disagrees with their brand of politics.

Stefanik was coming out of the grocery store with her husband when she found a note on their car. “Rot in hell FASCIST PIG,” the note read, obviously written by a cowardly leftist. She tweeted the following:

My husband and I went grocery shopping this morning before district events and enjoyed chatting with constituents throughout the store.
This vile anonymous note was left on our car. pic.twitter.com/4K5OBN8qVj
— Elise Stefanik (@EliseStefanik)

Stefanik really pissed people off on the left and other anti-Trumpers when, during the impeachment hearings in the House, she challenged Intel Chair Adam Schiff’s effort to cut off her ability to speak when yielded time by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), the ranking member on the Committee.

She earned a lot of praise for the way she handled herself and for standing up to the grandstanding Schiff. However, it made her a target for those on the left.

She called on her opponent, Tedra Cobb, to condemn the action. While Cobb said it was wrong, she didn’t specifically condemn such actions and she even suggested it was somehow the same as Stefanik calling her “Taxin’ Tedra,” which is clearly a political criticism.

Cobb tweeted:

@EliseStefanik you’re right, that type of discourse is damaging and wrong.
I think it’s time you joined me in pledging not to name call in this campaign. I’d love to work with you to set a better example for #NY21. https://t.co/Gl0rTr3SMW
— Tedra Cobb for Congress (@TedraCobb) March 7, 2020

Stefanik responded to Cobb's tweet:

This is not a condemnation.
Here is my opponent equating “Taxin” with “ROT IN HELL FASCIST PIG”
One is a policy difference (you have voted numerous times to raise taxes) the other is a vicious, vile, sick attack.
They are not the same and voters know it. https://t.co/DGmmWHcwZW
— Elise Stefanik (@EliseStefanik) March 7, 2020

Then we have "Screamin' Howard" Dean, the lunatic ex-Democratic presidential candidate and obviously a crap-monger who tweeted:

I don’t condone this, but “as ye sow, so shall ye reap”. There is no excuse for the note writer or for you. You are a shame to your district and to a democratic United States. https://t.co/k1rQL6rgnA
— Howard Dean (@GovHowardDean) March 8, 2020

For more on the moron [Dean] check out the video below.

If the parties of Stefanik and Dean were on the other foot, Dean would have gotten the same treatment as he deserved when he ran for POTUS and add to that the label of misogynist.

Low-functioning Democrats like Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) have encouraged harassment of GOP officials. Waters told the left to get up in their face when you see them and “push back,” let them know they “aren’t welcome anywhere.” She was referring to the notion of harassing Republicans who are out in public places such as restaurants.

[HT: Twitchy]


Please consider following this blog, and remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a terrorist gets his virgins.




Tweet

Ellison's problems complicate his DNC future

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) is a far left, Nation of Islam Leader Louis Farrakhan devotee, and a frontrunner to take over the Democratic National Committee. He is the first Muslim and to be elected to the House, but he is not the first anti-Semite, which makes him a perfect choice for the DNC position.

Now Ellison is facing serious questions not only about his sordid past but whether he can lead the DNC effectively without giving up his House seat.

Former DNC chairman "Screamin' Howard" Dean, is leading the call for a full-time leader and for Ellison to step down from the House if he gets the job. Dean ended his bid for the job and now wants to call the shots about the job. Interesting.

Dean who is a batcrap crazy 68 and a Hillary Clinton supporter, said that he dropped the DNC bid because the party needed a younger face and didn't want to get involved in an "ideological fight" between the party's establishment and anti-Semitic, more progressive wings. He believes that the job as DNC leader can only be done as a full-time commitment. 


Tweet

"Imam" Howard Dean thinks Iran is actually Jewish

Imam Howard "Mohammed" Dean

Remember when Howard Dean screamed at the Iowa caucuses when he finished third behind the Johns, Kerry and Edwards? That was a bone-headed move that ended his campaign for the presidential nomination.

Now Howard Dean has analyzed the Islamic Republic of Iran and concluded that they're not an Islamic Republic, they're an evil non-Islamic theocracy. 

Like maybe Jewish or Amish or Episcopalian. 

The trouble with Dean is that he thinks Islam is a wonderful religion because that's what he's been told--particularly by the Muslim Brotherhood and their brother organizations such as CAIR, ISNA and all the others connected with the religion of peace.

Dean told Breitbart News that "Iran is the farthest thing from an Islamic Republic" and is not "a Muslim country."

Now you have proof that Howard Dean is an idiot, a useful idiot as Islamists would say, and some might even call him the dumbest dhimmie one can imagine. 

Dummy Dean said that Iran is "a republic that's been hijacked by thugs and murderers.," adding that he doesn't know Muslims that he respects who behave the way the Iranian regime does.

So Imam Dean knows Islam.

In the Breitbart interview, Dean explained that he believes the term "radical Islamic terrorism" is a manufactured phrase "for political, domestic consumption in America." What he probably thinks the radical Islamic terrorist should be called is "misunderstanders of Islam," as Robert Spencer calls them when he's being satirical or sarcastic.

Liberals like Dean do not make us safer, they make us far less safe. They are willing to allow mass immigration of Muslim refugees that ISIS promised will be stocked with their own jihadists. 

The  majority of Syrian refugees tend to be young men, not women or children. ISIS mujahideen tend to be young men, not women or children. Why aren't those young men staying behind and fighting for their country?

When Imam Dean was asked if he understood the differences between Sunni Muslims and Shia Muslims he threw up his hands, shrugged his shoulders, let out a huge shout and ran out the door headed for Mecca.


Tweet

Charlie Will Do Muhammad Caricature Again

Charlie Hebdo, the satirical Parisian weekly that made headlines when much of its creative staff were killed by fake Muslims--for doing caricatures of the Islamic prophet Muhammad--is putting out a special edition.

A lawyer for Charlie Hebdo told French radio that the Wednesday issue will lampoon the prophet Muhammad, as well as other figures, to show the world that they will not give in to the terrorists who claim to be Muslims but are not because Islam is the religion of peace. In fact, those guys who are doing the killing in the name of Islam, are as Islamic as Howard Dean, the failed campaigner for US president said. 

Dean, who possibly read an article by CAIR about the beauty of Islam, said that there is nothing in the Koran that tells Muslims to commit the horrible acts that they are committing. He probably skipped suras: 2:126, 2:244, 3:56, 3:151, 4:74, 4:76, 4:89, 4:95, 4:104, 5:33, 8:12, 8:15, 8:39, 8:57, 8:59-60, 8:65, 9:5 (my favorite), 9:14, 9:20, 9:29, 9:38-39 . . . I can go on and on. But it's obvious Dean hasn't a clue about what's in there nor an idea about the rule of abrogation.

His Che tee shirt was dirty

The wannabe real Muslim brothers Cherif and Said Kouachi killed 11 people for printing derogatory caricatures of Muhammad, possibly depicting him as the kind of human being he actually was, which is forbidden in "Fake Islam." 

Isn't it weird that when people actually quote the Koran and Hadith, scripture from Islam, that it really gets those fake Muslims all riled up to the point of wanting to chop off heads? 

According to Sky News, a million copies of the weekly will be printed, and called it a special "survivors issue." Many of the copies will be available outside of France and this latest edition will be offered in 16 languages to hopefully weed out more make-believe Muslims who wish to kill in the prophet of Islam's name.

I suspect Barack Obama will not be amused.




Tweet

MSNBC and the Left Define Islam

The absence of courage is palpable in the press, particularly the liberal, PC, don't make any waves press. They are cowards, leaving journalism to fend for itself and freedom of speech a thing of the past.

In their "brave" reporting about the jihadist massacre in Paris, France, at the satirical weekly paper, Charlie Hebdo, the TV network I call "Marxist Slime Nothing But Sewage" (aka MSNBC) didn't have the courage to actually say precisely who it was that killed 12 people, and why they killed them.

In an online article by Michele Richinick, regarding the killing that took place at a kosher supermarket in Paris, the words "Islamic," "jihad," "Muslim," and "Muhammad," were never once used. Instead, she referred to the Islamic jihadists who killed 4 people and injuring five others as "a gunman." Regarding the two brothers responsible for the killings at the newspaper, she referred to them by name, used the term "suspects" and "terrorists," and mentioned the 2010 plot the supermarket jihadist and the newspaper jihadist were involved with about springing other "terrorists" from prison.

I'm a "practical European socialist"

But who can blame her for her cowardice when even the President of France, Francois Hollande called the supermarket attack "anti-Semitic" perpetrated by terrorists? He too never called out the religion of peace for the reason behind these attacks. In fact, like our own empty suit president, he made the claim that what these terrorists did is not representative of the real Islam.

Howard Dean (you remember him--he's the lunatic that lost the nomination for the presidency when he gave  his scream out in Iowa) said the men who committed the murders in Paris should be treated as mass murderers. To quote the moron: "I stopped calling these people Muslim terrorists. They're about as Muslim as I am. I mean, they have no respect for anybody else's life, that's not what the Koran says. And, you know Europe has an enormous radical problem . . . I think ISIS is a cult. Not an Islamic cult. I think it's a cult."

How Islam loves the Jews

Right Howie--shouting "Allahu akbar"  (Allah is greater) while killing people in his name is not Islamic. Perhaps we can blame it on the Jews or George Bush. The only reason the cartoonists were slaughtered at Charlie Hebdo was because of the cartoons they drew of Muhammad, the so-called prophet of Islam, the so-called religion of peace.

Then we have John "Swift Boat" Kerry who also claims that the Islamic State does "not represent Islam." 

Just because Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, has a masters degree and a PhD in Islamic Studies and is following the teachings of Muhammad to the letter, is no reason to think that he's a Muslim, doing what Muhammad would do if he were around.

Kerry, who also holds an adult education certificate in the Religions of the World, Part One, called ISIS a "militant cult masquerading as a religious movement."

Kerry is masquerading as a different kind of movement, one which most people have once or twice a day.

Even our Islamic-loving, Israeli-hating, Constitutional expert, socialist-Marxist president only used the term for the Paris attacks as terrorism, he too never described the kind of terrorism that it was--Islamic, jihadist--take your pick.

When the leftist media fails to identify what the real issues are the problem will only grow like a tumor that will one day be too large to treat. As a typing teacher once wrote: Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.

Tweet

Just Who Is Obama?

He was the candidate of change; the candidate who inspired the young. He spoke about making his White House, the most transparent in American history. His lovely wife, Michelle, was not proud to be an American as an adult until her husband, Barack Hussein was elected as our 44th president, and now she could finally say it. 

I think it's best for both of us for me to go

Obama has used Czars, people appointed by him, without the approval of Congress, to head various government departments, like Cass Sunstein, his Regulatory Czar, who believes that animals, critters that is, should have the same rights as humans so they can "sue" us in court. Since critters cannot speak for themselves, and hey, they can't really reason very well for themselves, they would use people to represent them so that they are treated fairly. I mean it. You can't make this stuff up, and it makes you wonder just who Obama, the man who appointed this lunatic, is.  But let's be very clear about who this Sunstein is--in his 2004 book, The Second Bill of Rights  he wrote: "In a variety of ways, subtle and less subtle, public and private actions have made it most difficult for socialism to have any traction in the United States. And he is hopeful that socialism will gain traction as he states: "It is even possible that desirable redistribution is more likely to occur through climate change policy."

Talking about his prison tats

Van Jones, Obama's former Green Jobs Czar first gained notoriety as a notorious criminal, arrested in a Los Angeles street riot and jailed. In jail, he buddied up with anarchists and communists. After his release, he had a new con game--environmentalist. Among his organizational skills, not unlike Obama's, Jones was a founder of Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (STORM). After Obama appointed him, America found out about him (guess he should have used Obama's legal team to cover up his past--Obama could have showed him too), and Van Jones resigned. His past showed him to be an admitted communist upon leaving prison, and a simple scumbag upon entering. Of course, Howard Dean, former Democratic National Committee chairman, praised him by saying that Van Jones' resignation "was a loss for the country." Patriots throughout the USA are examining this statement to discover just which country Dean was referring to. The NAACP called Van Jones "a national treasure." And rumor has it that when Jones was first hauled off to prison, his momma said "he's a good boy--just a little misunderstood, but he never mean nobody no harm no how." Evidently, Van's momma is telling the truth, or she is unfamiliar with the concept of the double-negative in speech.

Ron Bloom, a guy who said, "We kinda agree with Mao Zedong that power comes largely from the barrel of a gun," was appointed as Manufacturing Czar. Of course anyone who knows any history can tell you how Mao was responsible for the murder of at least a half million Chinese countrymen and was a ruthless tyrant, but Bloom loves the guy. Check him out on Youtube under "Ron Bloom Agrees with Mao" September 12, 2009 when he spoke at the Investor Conference. Bloom, you might imagine, is a full-blown commie, and Obama appointed him Manufacturing Czar. But he isn't the only Mao lover appointed by Hussein Obama--let us not forget the talented and lovely Anita Dunn, who thankfully is done as the White House Communications Director. She had to leave due to pressure placed on her by people known as Americans.


Science Czar, John Holden, calls for the "redistribution of wealth within an among nations." He wants this as jhe said,  "if a decent life is to be provided for every human being." He was not referring to just American human beings, but for all people on the planet.  


While Holden holds the Science Czar position, we also have Carol Browner as the Pseudoscience Czar--only kidding--she is the Climate Czar, but I'm not kidding by a lot. Comrad Browner was the commissioner for the Socialist International's Commission for a Sustainable World Society, an "umbrella group for many of the world's democratic political parties," as written in the Washington Times. This group supports socialism and is "harshly critical of U.S. policies." The goal of this group is basically to gain government power based on socialist concepts, and isn't that sorta kinda what the Obama administration seems to be touting?

In September 2009, Patrick McHenry (R-NC) called for a congressional review of Obama's czars. McHenry stated: "If the czars have high-level, decision-making authority, as their titles would indicate, then it is my concern that their appointment without Senate approval represents a circumvention of our Constitutionally-mandated confirmation process."

Tweet