It's sad to discover that some of the people you admired on the silver screen or your Smart Phone are not much smarter than a box of bellybutton lint. In this case, I'm referring to Penelope Cruz, Javier Bardem and Pedro Almodovar.
In an open letter, these low-information clowns have denounced Israel's "incursion into Gaza" and referred to Israel's actions of defending themselves "genocide."
Dictionary.com defines genocide as: the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or culture group.
Since Hamas is not a nation, has nothing to do with race, is not so much political as it is Islamic, and has absolutely no culturally redeeming value, I fail to see how it's genocide. Perhaps it is something else that Ms. Cruz and her useful idiots fail to identify--let's see.
Attacking Israel and clearly stating that you want to kill all of its Jewish inhabitants sounds closer to the definition of genocide to me. Hamas has stated this desire in their charter (chapter 7) and they do not deny this. Google Hamas Charter for yourself and see what I'm talking about.
Going back to Dictionary.com, they define self-defense thusly:
noun. 1. the act of defending one's person when physically attacked, as by countering blows or overcoming an assailant: the art of self-defense.
Well that would be true if Israel were a person, but metaphorically, we can agree that it can be categorized as such. Israel was attacked with rockets by Hamas, a terrorist organization that makes it perfectly clear that they are bent on destroying Israel, and then Israel responded to the attack by defending herself.
2. a claim or plea that the use of force or injuring or killing another was necessary in defending one's own person from physical attack: He shot the man who was trying to stab him and pleaded self-defense at the murder trial.
Hmm . . . Hamas fired rockets that were aimed at trying to kill civilians and Israel fired back, but with more authority and accuracy. That sounds like a case for self-defense for Israel, but only if you realize who fired first. Just because Israel is more effective in the fight does not make Hamas the victim of Israel's response.
3. an act or instance of defending or protecting one's own interests, property, ideas, etc., as by argument or strategy.
When deadly force is used against a country, the most effective strategy of self-defense is to counter that deadly force in kind. Israel could have allowed Hamas to fire rockets at Israel; after all, they weren't effectively killing civilians because Israel protected them with public bomb shelters. But eventually, if Israel did nothing to stop the attacks, Hamas would have hit targets, which was unacceptable to Israel, so they used self-defense and fired back. What did Hamas expect?
Hamas did not do what Israel did for their people: they built no shelters for the Palestinian civilians because Hamas took the concrete given to them by Israel (as a token of good will to help built housing) and used it to build terror tunnels that went from Gaza into Israel. Hamas used child labor to build these tunnels and over 100 Palestinian kids died in the digging process.
Rather than Cruz and her low-information colleagues condemning the use of children and other civilians as human shields for Hamas, they condemn Israel for self-defense.
The alternative these anti-Semitic "beautiful people" would like to see is for Israel to do nothing when Hamas fires their rockets, crawls through their tunnels to attack the kibbutzim and kill the men, women and children, in order to cleanse the land for Islamic conquest and establish a caliphate.
The "beautiful people" would like Israel to behave properly and be suicidal. And I know this because these asshats never say anything negative about the hatred Islam has shown to an entire group of people based upon their religion. Hamas has made it perfectly clear that they want the complete annihilation of the Israeli people and the Jews all across the world. But they are not in love with Christians either.
Now might be a good time to revisit the definition of genocide.
Once Islam eliminates the Jews, the next group to be attacked will be the "Sunday People," you and me. And I don't know about you, but I was never a big fan of the Holocaust and I am definitely not a fan of Islamic terrorism in the name of Allah.
We are at a very serious point in human history. The choices we make now will define us long into the future of the world. We can pretend nothing is happening with "the Jewish problem" like the town folk of Auschwitz did when they smelled smoke.
"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me."
Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
Tweet
Pardon Bardem |
In an open letter, these low-information clowns have denounced Israel's "incursion into Gaza" and referred to Israel's actions of defending themselves "genocide."
Dictionary.com defines genocide as: the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or culture group.
Since Hamas is not a nation, has nothing to do with race, is not so much political as it is Islamic, and has absolutely no culturally redeeming value, I fail to see how it's genocide. Perhaps it is something else that Ms. Cruz and her useful idiots fail to identify--let's see.
Attacking Israel and clearly stating that you want to kill all of its Jewish inhabitants sounds closer to the definition of genocide to me. Hamas has stated this desire in their charter (chapter 7) and they do not deny this. Google Hamas Charter for yourself and see what I'm talking about.
Going back to Dictionary.com, they define self-defense thusly:
noun. 1. the act of defending one's person when physically attacked, as by countering blows or overcoming an assailant: the art of self-defense.
Well that would be true if Israel were a person, but metaphorically, we can agree that it can be categorized as such. Israel was attacked with rockets by Hamas, a terrorist organization that makes it perfectly clear that they are bent on destroying Israel, and then Israel responded to the attack by defending herself.
2. a claim or plea that the use of force or injuring or killing another was necessary in defending one's own person from physical attack: He shot the man who was trying to stab him and pleaded self-defense at the murder trial.
Hmm . . . Hamas fired rockets that were aimed at trying to kill civilians and Israel fired back, but with more authority and accuracy. That sounds like a case for self-defense for Israel, but only if you realize who fired first. Just because Israel is more effective in the fight does not make Hamas the victim of Israel's response.
3. an act or instance of defending or protecting one's own interests, property, ideas, etc., as by argument or strategy.
When deadly force is used against a country, the most effective strategy of self-defense is to counter that deadly force in kind. Israel could have allowed Hamas to fire rockets at Israel; after all, they weren't effectively killing civilians because Israel protected them with public bomb shelters. But eventually, if Israel did nothing to stop the attacks, Hamas would have hit targets, which was unacceptable to Israel, so they used self-defense and fired back. What did Hamas expect?
Hamas did not do what Israel did for their people: they built no shelters for the Palestinian civilians because Hamas took the concrete given to them by Israel (as a token of good will to help built housing) and used it to build terror tunnels that went from Gaza into Israel. Hamas used child labor to build these tunnels and over 100 Palestinian kids died in the digging process.
Rather than Cruz and her low-information colleagues condemning the use of children and other civilians as human shields for Hamas, they condemn Israel for self-defense.
The alternative these anti-Semitic "beautiful people" would like to see is for Israel to do nothing when Hamas fires their rockets, crawls through their tunnels to attack the kibbutzim and kill the men, women and children, in order to cleanse the land for Islamic conquest and establish a caliphate.
She forgot her burqa and ditch the dog |
The "beautiful people" would like Israel to behave properly and be suicidal. And I know this because these asshats never say anything negative about the hatred Islam has shown to an entire group of people based upon their religion. Hamas has made it perfectly clear that they want the complete annihilation of the Israeli people and the Jews all across the world. But they are not in love with Christians either.
Now might be a good time to revisit the definition of genocide.
Let's be clear: this is genocide and it isn't being done by the Jews |
Once Islam eliminates the Jews, the next group to be attacked will be the "Sunday People," you and me. And I don't know about you, but I was never a big fan of the Holocaust and I am definitely not a fan of Islamic terrorism in the name of Allah.
We are at a very serious point in human history. The choices we make now will define us long into the future of the world. We can pretend nothing is happening with "the Jewish problem" like the town folk of Auschwitz did when they smelled smoke.
"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me."
Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment