The Genderless Scouts of America to receive rubbers (and not for the rain)

The former Boy Scouts, now known as Scouts BSA, have decided to allow people who identify as gay and lesbian to become Scouts BSA-ers. 

So now at the Scouts' 24th World Jamboree, they have a mandate that condoms be made available to "all participants" at the global get-together. 

But what with all the gender identification confusion, it isn't easy to know who gets to use one and who gets to have it used on them, or who doesn't need one and who can drink booze.

The Scouts BSA says "For the first time, a world jamboree will be hosted by three national Scout organizations: Scouts Canada, Asociación de Scouts de México, and the Boy Scouts of America [which is no longer called that, but hey, it's a jamboree and something is apparently gonna get jamboreed]. These three distinct cultures will join together to host the world Scouting community in a celebration of cultural exchange [possibly along with bodily fluids], mutual understanding, and friendship."

And you're probably going to need condoms and a cheat sheet as to who is what. 

It should be fun for the whole family.

Regarding the condom policy, John Stemberger, president of the Florida Family Policy Council, wrote that "it is not clear how far down the rabbit hole the Boy Scouts will continue to fall."

"With the addition of condoms and alcohol, the World Jamboree is starting to sound more like a 1960s Woodstock festival rather than a campout that parents would want to send their children to!"

Stemberger is also chairman of the board for Trail Live USA, an alternative to the genderless Scouts, and it continues to abide by the Boy Scout motto: "On my honor I will do my best to do my duty to God and my country and to obey the scout law; to help other people at all times; to keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight."

I can only imagine how the present day Scouts BSA will change the motto: "On my honor I will kind of try to do my best to do my duty; to work out, read only what my teachers tell me to read; and be morally straight or gay."

Stemberger said that with what's happening in the Scouts, it "should be deeply disturbing to the churches that are chartering Boy Scout Troops."

"These policies present a clear youth protection problem that the BSA absolutely refuses to recognize. The fact that they are requiring that condoms be 'readily accessible' and are communicating this to everyone--including youth participants--shows that the BSA is both anticipating and facilitating sexual conduct between minors at this event. These policies are both outrageous and completely irresponsible," Stemberger said.

The World Scout Committee is demanding host nations "ensure that condoms are readily and easily accessible for all participants and IST [staff] at a number of locations on the site."

Free birth control. What's next, free abortions if a condom breaks?

"Heads of Contingent must be informed in advance and made aware of their responsibility in communicating this policy to their Participants, Unit Leaders, Contingent Staff, and IST in an appropriate way."

I suppose they'll put out a large bowl of condoms for display.

The guidelines to the jamboree allows the use of alcohol by adults in some locations, according to the Florida Family Policy Council.

The theme of the event is: "Unlock a New World" [and grab a condom, kids].

The BSA's genderless new policy has angered the Girl Scouts of America, and who can blame them? The council stated the following:

"The change to allow girls into the BSA provoked a blistering response from the national Girl Scouts of America organization last year when they issued the following statement: 'The Boy Scouts' house is on fire. Instead of addressing systemic and deficient programming, BSA's senior management wants to add an accelerant to the house fire by recruiting girls.'"

I wonder what the jamboree will be like next year. I don't have a good feeling about it but I hope BSA comes to its senses.

But who am I kidding?


Tweet

A boy who thinks he's a girl beats girls in track

The guy's in green

If you are what you think, why do we put people who think they're God in mental institutions?

An Alaskan high school student with the gender gear of a guy thinks he's a girl. If he thought he was a unicorn, would he able to use the unicorn bathroom? Of course not--no respectable female unicorn would stand for that and she would impale the guy if he put one foot past the bathroom threshold. 

The guy who thinks he's a girl runs on the girls track team and due to basic genetics, runs faster than most of the real girls on the team. The real girls who lost to this confused guy (or guy who's just saying he's a she to beat the slower girls) are upset that they have to compete against someone with male attributes. 

This was the first time in Alaska's history that a dude competed in the girls' state championships and it's upsetting real girls who aren't built like the guy who thinks he's a she.

This is not a transgender milestone. It is not an achievement. It's a farce.

Haines High School senior Nattaphon Wangyot (aka "Ice")  is an immigrant from Thailand and competed in the state championships in May in the 100 and 200-meter dashes. He also competed in girls' volleyball and basketball in the fall.

Saskia Harrison, a real girl and runner from Hutchison High School in Fairbanks ran against the guy and lost. Her time in the 100 was 14.11 seconds and just missed the cut, thanks to the dude. "I'm glad that this person is comfortable with who they are and they're able to be happy in who they are, but I don't think it's competitively completely 100 percent fair," she said.

The president of the Alaska Family Action, Jim Minnery held a press conference. "We are here today as a voice from the community to ensure that female athletes are not denied the playing opportunities and scholarships otherwise available to them and to make the playing field even again," he said.

He said that "allowing students to play on teams of the opposite sex disproportionately impacts female students, who will lose spots on a track, soccer and volleyball teams to male students who identify as female."

But that should make GLAAD glad. 

Freshman/woman Alia Bales said she had no clue a dude was running as a girl. "I didn't even notice it," she said. 

If it's true that transgender guys will push out real gals from championships, then these effects may go unnoticed and be more difficult to see.

If they are going to allow boys to compete with girls because the boys think that they're girls too, then they ought to go through hormone therapy and level the playing field. Otherwise, they should compete with their own gender until they share female hormones.

Even then, boys will have the muscle mass advantage over girls--it's biology, not sexism.


Tweet

The Scientific Method of Liberals

A fact is something that actually exists, or something known to exist or to have happened. A fact is a truth known by actual experience or observation, or known to be true. It is something said to be true or supposed to have happened.

A 'myth' is an antonym for 'fact'.

A "factsheet" was issued by the City of New York by their Commission on Human Rights. The cretins involved claimed that it is a "myth" that biological men are not "real women." 

Obviously, none of these liberals know much about biology and psychology. 

The commission published a "myths vs. facts" document on gender identity and gender expression after they received myriad criticism over its transgender guidance forcing businesses to accommodate 31 (!!!) different gender identities. Trees and animals were not included.

One of the "myths" on the list is that "Transgender women are not 'real' women, and transgender men are not 'real' men."

In other words, your gender is what you believe it to be, not what gender hides inside your underpants, in your genes, and in the biological differences that make up gender.

With that line of thinking it stands to reason that people who believe they are not a real person, but rather believe that they are, say, a rooster, are a rooster--even if they walk like a duck. Thus, they would have the right to have sex with consenting chickens, if chickens were able to give consent, and no liberal would be disturbed by this act of bestiality.

So if a person believes (s)he's a rooster, then that person is a rooster--regardless of what his or her birth certificate indicates and (s)he should be treated as a rooster.

Therefore, if biology is not to be used as the basis for gender, it stands to reason that it should not be used to determine species. Proof again, that facts do not matter to liberals . . . only feelings . . . nothing more than feelings.

The schizophrenics are running the asylum.


Tweet