Bette Midler joins 2020 race to the flop

Dem's newest presidential hopeful--really

Socialist former actress Bette Midler is now declaring herself to be a 2020 "write-in candidate" for President of the United States of America! She is not happy with the current truckload of leftist candidates who are vying to beat President Trump in next year's election and she believes she can win.

In her Twitter bio, Midler uses the tagline: “Write-in candidate 2020! #BeBette.”

Write-in votes are usually generated by voters who don't see a name they want to vote for on the ballot and write in a name of their own choosing. This happened when Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump ran last time and people weren't satisfied with the two choices.

But Midler is too dense to realize that since her voters, like herself, are so anti-Trump, any vote for her would, in effect, be like a vote for Trump rather than his opponent.

Newsbusters got right on the case with this tweet:

.@BetteMidler Is Thinking About Contributing to a @realDonaldTrump Win. Good for her! #BeBettehttps://t.co/UTZml2e5E5
— NewsBusters (@newsbusters) August 2, 2019

The 73-year-old singer-songwriter has long been one of Hollywood’s most aggressive anti-Trump voices, repeatedly fantasizing about the death of him and his family because she's just that kind of person. If you don't like Trump, you wish him dead, along with his children, wife and his goldfish.

In July, the low-information performer accused Trump of "raping us all with Impunity," and lied with the claim that women could end up on "death row" for having abortions in Alabama. The truth is, women who undergo an illegal abortion are not held liable, only the medical personnel who perform the baby-killing. She even lied with the claim that Trump paid off black folks to stand behind him at his rallies and form a "blackground." Even her leftist friends and others called her out for being a racist, implying that she believes black people would only support Trump if he paid them, not because they could think for themselves.

Let us all hope she does what she says she'll do, but don't count on it--she's a leftist and they're not known for telling the truth.

Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not.

Tweet

MSNBC grills Chelsea Clinton over Bill's sexcapades

Chelsea Clinton was just a kid of 15 when her father's affair began with a then 22-year-old intern, Monica Lewinsky, so one must imagine that her opinion about the scandal would be interpreted differently by her than the American public and by her mother, Hillary, who lost the presidential campaign to Donald Trump in 2016.

So when NBC and MSNBC "reporter" Peter Alexander asked her about the scandal in terms that could only be considered raw, Chelsea was understandably upset by the question.

The former first daughter was asked by Alexander: "Did you ever get the chance to see the blue dress of Monica Lewinsky with your father's semen stain on it?"

You cannot blame her for her lashing out at the man who would dare ask such a question: "So it was a semen stain. So what? It isn't like what Lewinsky and my dad did was not the same as having sex. He already told you people that. How dare you ask me such a question. I'm his daughter, for heaven sake, and I believe my dad over some bimbo accuser."

"Hah haaaah haaaaaaaah!"

So here was yet another case of the people in the news making the news, because they don't actually know how to do news.

Former journalist Jake Tapper of the Communist News Network defended Alexander saying that Chelsea was old enough at the time her father was sticking Havana cigars where they don't belong, and quite possibly sexually active herself, to be asked such a question. 

He also said that he would do the same line of questioning with Ivanka Trump if given the opportunity and either one of the Obama daughters because that's the kind of hard-hitting newsman he is.


Tweet