Showing posts with label Students for Life in America. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Students for Life in America. Show all posts

Thursday, October 8, 2026

Abdul El-Sayed Calls Pregnant Women “Simply a Carrying Vehicle” for Babies




KALAMAZOO, MI — Michigan Democratic Senate nominee and anti-Semite extraordinaire, Abdul El-Sayed informed a pro-life student that a pregnant mother is “simply a carrying vehicle for a fetus that has not ever breathed air,” after she asked why she should vote for him. 

The exchange occurred at a “Students vs. Billionaires” event on the Western Michigan University campus. El-Sayed did not use the word “woman.” Instead, like a good leftist, he referred to the pregnant mother as “an adult, or sometimes even a juvenile human.” 

“I respect your position insofar as it’s founded in the idea that you want to protect and empower life,” El-Sayed told the student. “The question we have to ask ourselves is, what’s the best way to do that? And whose life gets destroyed in that process?” That is, if you help one life, you are somehow destroying another life--it's the same playbook leftists use to say that billionaires are taking money away from others in order to be rich.

He continued: “Because too often when government says that you cannot have reproductive care, you are creating a circumstance in which an adult, or sometimes even a juvenile human, is being reduced into simply a carrying vehicle for a fetus that has not ever breathed air.” 

He later clarified that restricting abortion turns “the currently existing life of the mother” into “simply a carrying vehicle for a fetus.” Campaign aides confirmed the nominee remains open to other vehicle metaphors, provided the fetus has not completed the required air-intake paperwork.

Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life of America, said the answer treats a pre-born child as if the baby does not count until a first breath outside the womb.

“I’ve carried four babies. I was their mother long before any of them breathed air,” she said. “The Pro-Life Generation knows a pre-born baby is still a baby.”

Hawkins noted that El-Sayed has pledged to repeal the Hyde Amendment, which bars federal taxpayer funding of most abortions, to defend government funding for Planned Parenthood, and to keep tax dollars from pregnancy resource centers, which he has called “fake clinics.” Sources say the clinics’ principal offense is offering diapers instead of the correct philosophical category for the occupant.

When Planned Parenthood Action Fund endorsed him in August, she said, he praised “the tenacity and compassion of the folks at Planned Parenthood” and said he looked forward to partnering with them in the Senate. 

El-Sayed and pro-life Republican Mike Rogers are set to debate Thursday in Grand Rapids. Hawkins said Students for Life Action students plan to be outside, and that the group is targeting the Michigan Senate race ahead of the Nov. 3 election. She also pointed to a leaked Democratic playbook that, she said, puts abortions up to birth and repeal of the Hyde Amendment at the top of the list if Democrats take Congress, with a promise to act within the first 100 hours.

At press time, El-Sayed’s campaign was still refining whether the carrying vehicle retains voting rights once the fetus has been successfully delivered to the curb.

Dear readers, please take time to give a click on the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.


Friday, November 20, 2020

Pro-Life Students now suing D.C. for being denied free speech and were arrested



Washington, D.C. -- Pro-life students, members of Students for Life of America (SLFA) who had been arrested in August for legally writing in chalk: "Black Preborn Lives Matter" are now suing the city for the infringement of their First Amendment rights.

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) filed a lawsuit this week on behalf of these students.

While an entire plaza is named and permanently painted with “Black Lives Matter” (BLM), the pro-life students were barred from writing “Black Preborn Lives Matter” in chalk outside of a Planned Parenthood building, despite the fact that they’d received a permit to do so from the city. 

Yes, they had a freaking permit!

The students’ chalk message,“Black Preborn Lives Matter,” served to address the fact that unborn children of minority mothers have a statistically higher likelihood of being aborted, according to this Supreme Court amicus curiae brief.

According to SFLA, the group had obtained a permit from the city to peacefully protest with the use of temporary paint on sidewalks, but the D.C. Metro police said otherwise. They warned them they’d be arrested for the use of temporary paint, despite the fact that pro-BLM protesters had been allowed to use paint for their “Defund The Police” message.

So, in an attempt to comply with the self-loathing cops, the pro-life activists instead used chalk, as it was far easier to remove. A light rainfall would do the job, but the police still wouldn’t allow it because they didn't want to offend the Marxist BLMers.

“Two students were arrested trying to express in chalk what they were not allowed to say in paint,” said Students for Life of America President Kristan Hawkins. “That kind of viewpoint discrimination cannot be allowed to continue unchallenged.”

In a letter sent to the execrable Mayor Muriel Bowser before the incident, Hawkins noted:

Your original decision to paint ‘Black Lives Matter’ on the street is government speech. However, your decision to allow protestors to paint ‘Defund the Police’ opened the streets up as a public forum. You are not permitted to discriminate on the basis of viewpoint in making determinations relating to public assemblies in public fora.

Viewpoint discrimination is the unconstitutional practice of a government prohibiting certain speech and expression on the basis of the message it promulgates. 

And let's hope they take the city to the cleaners.

The U.S. Supreme Court has on multiple occasions ruled on such discrimination cases that violate the First Amendment.

In the opinion of the Court Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley (1972), Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote “the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content.”

Twenty-three years later, the unconstitutionality of viewpoint discrimination was solidified in Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia (1995).

Justice Anthony Kennedy delivered the opinion of the court, stating, “When the government targets not subject matter but particular views taken by speakers on a subject, the violation of the First Amendment is all the more blatant.”

Justice Kennedy further noted viewpoint discrimination as an “egregious form of content discrimination.” 

This is what the left has been calling for regarding conservative viewpoints as they would like to eliminate all differing political thought.

“Because of the city’s actions, Frederick Douglass Foundation and Students for Life of America weren’t able to participate in the public square as other groups have,” said Legal Counsel Elissa Graves of ADF, the group heading up the lawsuit. “The government can’t discriminate against certain viewpoints by allowing some voices to be heard while silencing others.”

But they will continue to try discriminating against these viewpoints because their arguments against them are weak.



C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon.




Iran regime's January crackdown murdered 221 children

In late December 2025, economic grievances ignited nationwide protests in the Islamic Republic of Iran that rapidly escalated into systemic...