Zohran 'the magnificent' had wanted to abolish private property, but not his or his family's

Comrade Mamdani 

Well, look who’s back to remind us why New York City is headed for the dumpster fire of the century. Zohran Mamdani, the communist darling running for mayor, just got caught on a resurfaced video waxing poetic about . . . wait for it . . . abolishing private property. Although it's highly likely he doesn't mean his or his wealthy family's property. 

This guy’s out here channeling an anti-Semitic version of Karl Marx like it’s 1848, and he’s too dumb to hide it.

In the clip that’s now blowing up conservative social media faster than a Trump tweet, Mamdani lays it all bare: "My platform is that every single person should have housing, and I think faced with these two options, the system has hundreds of thousands of people unhoused, right? For what?" 

Okay, fine, housing’s a problem. But then he goes full hammer-and-sickle: "If there was any system that could guarantee each person housing, whether you call it the abolition of private property or you call it, you know, just a statewide housing guarantee, it is preferable to what is going on right now." Which is people who work and earn money, save for housing or a home, need to get over themselves and forget about it. Let's all live together in a commune. In fact, the word 'communist' is derived from 'commune.'

Oh, and don’t miss the cherry on top: "People try and play like gotcha games about these kinds of things, and it’s like, look, I care more about whether somebody has a home." Like sure, Zohran, nothing like screams like "I care" by like seizing everyone’s property.

Cue the conservative pile-on, and boy, did they bring the heat. Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, whose mother fled Cuba’s communist nightmare, didn’t hold back in an interview with Fox News Digital: "He claims to be a socialist, whether it’s wanting to abolish private property or wanting to seize the means of production, these are communist ideas right out of the playbook of Karl Marx."

And did I mention he's an anti-Semite?

Malliotakis then added, "The fact that too many members of the media, too many members of the Democrat Party, are willing to go along instead of calling him out on it is disturbing, and I think that if the majority of New Yorkers knew what this guy truly stands for and how destructive and dangerous his policies are, there’s no way that they vote for him." 

Then there’s Rep. Mike Lawler, who’s not exactly thrilled about Mamdani’s plan to turn the Hudson Valley into Havana-on-the-Hudson: "Zohran Mamdani’s call to abolish private property is dangerous and un-American. It’s the kind of radical socialist nonsense that would destroy livelihoods in the Hudson Valley and across New York. This will bring economic chaos, and New Yorkers deserve better than out-of-touch extremists pushing communist agendas that threaten our way of life." 

Rep. Claudia Tenney piled on, telling Fox News Digital: "Mamdani’s call to abolish private property isn’t just radical, it’s dangerous. Stripping this fundamental right would devastate families, close small businesses, and destroy entire communities, all while handing more power to the government. Private property is a cornerstone Constitutional principle. It represents the essence of personal freedom, economic opportunity, and the American Dream. We must defend it."

But the commie has nothing to personally worry about. His parents are very wealthy and communism will not affect the rich and powerful--it rarely does.

And Rep. Nick Langworthy isn't here for Mamdani’s utopian fever dream either: "Mamdani isn’t offering a housing plan--he’s pushing a communist manifesto. The idea of abolishing private property is fundamentally anti-American and wildly out of touch with the real issues New Yorkers face. Families are fleeing the City and our State because of high costs, crime, and broken leadership, not because there’s too much freedom."

The X platform, naturally, turned into a digital Thunderdome. Donald Trump Jr. couldn’t resist the low-hanging fruit, posting, "Yea, this guy is definitely not a communist," dripping with sarcasm. 

Sen. Ted Cruz kept it short and sweet: “He is a communist.” Fox News contributor Marc Thiessen echoed, “Like I said he’s a communist.” 

And Rep. Elise Stefanik brought the fire: "Yes, you heard that right. Like the true Communist he is, Commie Mamdani supports the ‘abolition of private property.’ This is the NY Democrat Party
@KathyHochul you lead and you have failed to condemn this dangerous insanity." 

Sen. Roger Marshall summed it up: "Meet the new leader of the Democrat party, everyone. He’s a literal communist."

Mamdani’s been dodging "communist" labels since his shock primary win, but clips like this aren’t helping his case. New Yorkers are already fleeing skyrocketing costs, crime, and a city that feels like it’s one bad policy away from collapse. Now they’ve got a mayoral candidate who thinks the solution is torching the very concept of ownership. Good luck selling that one, comrade.

All in all, this toad is still going to get a lot of Muslim votes simply because he is a Muslim. Do not allow him to get his foot in the door because he and his comrades [no pun intended] are not going to let you close that door.

Hey amazing readers! If you enjoy my content, please consider supporting Brain Flushings. A quick coffee donation via Buy Me a Coffee fuels late-night writing sessions and fresh ideas. Every sip—er, dollar—helps me create more of the posts you enjoy. Join the crew, toss in a coffee, and let’s keep the good vibes brewing! 

Tweet

House GOP disembowels leftist Dems skipping Netanyahu speech

The Arab world's problems are a problem of the Arab mind, and the name for that problem is anti-Semitism--Bret Stephens 

There are [Warning: next word to follow is an oxymoron] progressive Democrats who are threatening to attend Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech at next month's joint session of Congress, and House Republicans are going hard against these selective misanthropes. It isn't like they'll be missed or make Bibi Netanyahu feel upset by their absence; it's just that it makes the Democrats look like the Party of Fools.

Netanyahu's address is expected to be delivered by July 24 while the Jewish State continues to fight terrorists in Gaza.

There are a number of Democrats upset with Israel for not allowing Hamas to kill them. They are also upset that when Hamas hid Jewish hostages among the Gaza Arabs and Israel rescued the hostages, a number of Arabs were killed in the process. Not surprisingly, even the BBC was upset that Israel didn't warn the terrorists that they would be coming to get their people and there might be some violence. After all, just because Hamas forgot to warn the young people at the Nova music festival that they were coming to kill them, rape and mutilate them, and take hundreds of them as hostages, is no reason the Jews should get a free pass.

Anyway, several Democrats have said they would boycott Bibi's address in protest of Israel having the audacity to be winning the war they didn't start. For some reason, this didn't sit well with the Grand Old Party.

The No. 3 House GOP leader, Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN), labeled Democrats "the anti-Israel party" in a statement to Fox News Digital.

"Their threats to boycott Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Joint Address is another notch on their long list of betrayals of our strongest ally in the Middle East," Emmer said.

Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY), called the would-be boycotters "apologists for terrorism," adding, "Their refusal to stand with our closest ally in the Middle East emboldens murderers and extremists who seek to destroy democracy and freedom worldwide."

Army combat veteran Rep. Brian Mast (R-FL), who led the House GOP's effort to sanction the International Criminal Court for threatening to go after Netanyahu, said of the Democrats' boycott, "Too bad they don't seem to care about the six Americans being held hostage by Hamas in Gaza as much as they care about establishing a Palestinian state."

Historically, Palestine was a Jewish state but the term was stolen by the scumwafer Yassar Arafat in order to give legitimacy to the Jordan Arabs who occupied it in the second half of the Twentieth Century.

Perhaps the most powerful Republican Representative was Mike Garcia (R-CA), a retired Navy pilot, told Fox News Digital that the speech would only be "a ’controversial' or 'counterproductive' speech" if Israel’s Democratic critics "make it one."

"There’s nothing controversial about allowing the elected leader of America’s greatest ally – who’s in the middle of a war against… U.S.-designated terrorists – speak to the Congress that’s funding and supporting Israel’s fight for survival," Garcia said.

There were many more responses but you get the picture. The Democrats have always pretended to be the virtuous Party, but they never were.

Tweet