Israel Announces Plan To Surround Hamas Prisoners With Crocodiles In What Experts Call The Most Humane Form Of Deterrence Yet

Israeli Environmental Protection Minister Idit Silman reclassified crocodiles from wild animals to “cultivated wild animals,” opening the door for them to be used to guard the country’s prisons holding Hamas operatives, a decision that has already sent progressive animal rights activists into a frenzy of pearl clutching over the welfare of the reptiles rather than the terrorists.

The regulation implemented Wednesday allowed crocodiles to be bred by government officials as long as they are held “in conditions determined by the [Nature and Parks Authority] director, to prevent their interference with nature,” the Times of Israel reported.

Finally, a government agency doing something useful with the environment instead of just lecturing people about plastic straws. Israel’s National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who pitched the idea last year, celebrated the change online.

“Ministers Ben-Gvir and Silman are collaborating and surrounding the prisons with crocodiles!” Ben-Gvir posted on Facebook Thursday, adding an AI-generated image of himself with a pet crocodile and the caption, “You filthy terrorist, thinking about making a run for it? Think twice.”

Ben-Gvir and Silman have taken inspiration from Trump’s “Alligator Alcatraz” that used the Everglades’s natural alligator population to deter its inmates from escaping, according to NewsNation. Because nothing says justice like borrowing a page from the most successful border security innovator in recent history.

Ben-Gvir hopes that Nile crocodiles will be placed at Ketziot Prison, which hosts many prisoners from Hamas. Nile crocodiles are one of the most dangerous animals in the world, the other is jihad.

SeaWorld notes that Nile crocodiles can grow up to 20 feet long, half the length of a typical school bus, and can weigh over 1,500 pounds. Not only do Nile crocodiles prey on hippos, zebras, or wildebeest, and they are one of the only known reptile species to actively hunt humans. In other words, the perfect match for a group that has demonstrated a similar enthusiasm for hunting humans.

Neta Drori, the Environmental Protection Ministry’s legal adviser, wrote to Silman in June that there is no known precedent of using crocodiles to protect prisons, and noted that crocodile breeding in the past has led to the animals escaping and terrorizing local populations. As if the real terror were the crocodiles and not the people they would be guarding.

“With regard to the use in the United States, it was noted that this was a short-lived trial that was discontinued. It apparently took place in an area where crocodiles already occur in the wild, and there is therefore no basis for comparison,” Drori wrote. “Although Prison Service officials said they are aware of and prepared to ensure the animals’ physical welfare, among other things based on their experience with dogs, the organization apparently has no expertise in raising dangerous wild animals such as crocodiles,” Drori added, concluding that despite the reclassification of the crocodile, Israeli law requires legislative approval of the decision to add crocodiles to the country’s prisons.

Silman has rejected Drori’s opinion, citing testimony from senior officials that the bureaucratic framework allows her and Ben-Gvir to implement the crocodile plan. A rare moment of government officials actually cutting through red tape to do something effective.

The Nature and Parks Authority is expected to meet soon and discuss the legality of Silman and Ben-Gvir’s plan. “The minister is acting contrary to her own legal adviser, contrary to the legal opinion of the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, contrary to the authority’s plenum, and contrary to the law. In other words, there is no legal basis for this,” an official told the Jerusalem Post.

Sources confirm the official then returned to worrying about the emotional trauma the crocodiles might experience while staring down hardened terrorists, however they also agree that Middle East food is delicious.

I want to thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Internal Security Minister says "All of Lebanon must burn" after 4 IDF soldiers killed

Ben-Gvir wears a hangman's noose pin to back the Death to Terrorists bill,
Monday, December 8, 2025 (Otzma Yehudit)

The death of four Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon on Friday has once again exposed a widening divide between those who must confront the realities of war and those who prefer to theorize about it from a safe distance . . . like most politicians and pundits do.

Among the dead was Lt. Col. Dor Ben Simhon, commander of Battalion 52, along with three of his soldiers. Their deaths came after an attack by Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed terrorist organization that has spent decades embedding itself within Lebanon while threatening Israel's northern border. 

Lt. Col. Ben Simhon

According to the Israel Defense Forces, the battalion commander's tank was struck shortly after midnight. Military investigators are still determining whether the attack involved an explosive device or a drone launched by Hezbollah operatives.

The losses prompted a furious response from National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who correctly argued that Israel's enemies must be made to understand the consequences of attacking the Jewish state.

"With all due respect to the Americans, Israel must make it clear to the entire world that the blood of our sons and the security of our citizens are not up for bargaining. All of Lebanon must burn," Ben-Gvir said.

His remarks arrived at a particularly sensitive moment. Senior American officials have increasingly expressed frustration with Israel's continued military operations to defend itself. Israel is, of course, opposed to the MoU signed by President Trump on Wednesday that pretends to bring an end to the conflict with Iran, a country that hopes to bring back the 12th imam and totally annihilate Israel and Jews worldwide.

One provision of the MoU extends the ceasefire to Lebanon, a condition that many Israeli officials regard with deep skepticism, knowing the 12th imam thingy and that anti-Semitism situation.

Their concern is totally rational. 

Hezbollah remains heavily armed, deeply entrenched, and openly committed to Israel's destruction. To many Israelis, any arrangement that leaves that reality fundamentally unchanged appears less like a peace agreement than a temporary pause, as anyone with a functioning cortex would agree with.

Yet in an interview with The New York Times, Vice President JD Vance appeared dismissive of such concerns.

"There is this weird panic almost in the Israeli system that I've picked up on, where they assume that everything that is contemplated that is good for Iran will happen, but that will happen without the Iranians changing any behavior. And I just don't know why anybody would think that's true," Vance, who is not a Jew nor lives in Israel said.

It is a curious observation. After all, modern Israeli skepticism did not emerge in a vacuum. It was shaped by decades of experience with adversaries who routinely violated agreements, exploited ceasefires, and treated diplomatic concessions as opportunities for strategic regrouping. What some observers characterize as panic, others might call memory.

Vance acknowledged that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had not publicly criticized the memorandum but pointed to figures such as Ben-Gvir who had done so.

"It's clear that large segments of the Israeli political system and population are very sensitive about this deal," he said. "But I also think they're picking up on some misinformation about the deal and running with it and sort of panicking about it."

The vice president then offered a challenge to Israeli critics.

"I guess my response to them would be: What is your exact proposal? You're a country of nine million people. You can't just kill your way out of solving every single national security problem that you have."

The question is fair enough. Yet it is equally fair to ask what alternatives are available when a neighboring terrorist army repeatedly attacks your citizens while openly declaring its intention to destroy your country. Nations do not choose the threats they face. They must deal with the threats that actually exist.

President Trump also voiced dissatisfaction with Israel's conduct in Lebanon during the G7 conference. After all, the terrorists crossed their hearts and promised to never kill anyone anymore.

"We have a little dispute over Lebanon," Trump told reporters. "I say, 'You can do a little softer touch, Bibi. You don't have to knock down a building every time somebody walks into it that's from Hezbollah.'"

Such comments reflect a familiar tension in Western policymaking. Leaders far from the battlefield understandably desire restraint and stability. Those living within range of Hezbollah rockets tend to place a higher premium on security, unlike politicians. The challenge, as always, is that while diplomatic agreements can be signed in conference rooms, the consequences of failure are paid for on the front lines.

For Israel, the deaths of Lt. Col. Ben Shimhon and his fellow soldiers serve as a stark reminder that Hezbollah remains a lethal threat. Any discussion of ceasefires, memorandums, or regional diplomacy must begin with that reality rather than attempt to wish it away.

Thank you for following Brain Flushings. Please take time to simply check out the sponsors on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything to do so. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee if you want to support me directly. And finally, don't be afraid to subscribe if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and worth the cost.

Tweet

Ron Dermer resigns, says Bibi’s gov’t will be remembered for Oct. 7

In the annals of Israeli politics, where the line between triumph and tragedy is often drawn in blood and sand, there comes a moment when even the most steadfast warriors step back, not in defeat, but in a quiet act of reckoning. Such was the case on Tuesday, when Ron Dermer, Israel's Strategic Affairs Minister and a figure as unyielding as the Judean hills, tendered his resignation to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It was a departure laced not with bitterness, but with the unflinching clarity that has long defined Dermer: a reminder that the stewardship of a nation's survival demands more than endurance; it demands wisdom.

Dermer, who had helmed the negotiations for the release of hostages with a tenacity that bordered on the heroic, did not mince words in his letter. "This government will be remembered both for the October 7 attack and for its management of the two-and-a-half-year-long war and the seven fronts that followed," he wrote, a sentence that lands like a stone skipped across the Dead Sea, rippling out to expose the fractures beneath the surface of Israel's protracted ordeal.

One recalls Dermer at the Jewish News Syndicate conference in Jerusalem just months earlier, on April 28, 2025, his voice steady as he spoke of redemption amid the rubble. Now, in stepping away, he honors a vow made to his family: two years of service, extended twice with their blessing, but no more. "I wish to thank you for the opportunity to serve alongside you in the past three years and for the trust you placed in me to deal with the most significant issues Israel is facing at this critical time," he added, a gracious nod to the man who appointed him, even as the shadows of their shared burdens lengthen.The image lingers: Netanyahu, Dermer, and the Prime Minister's military secretary, Maj.-Gen. Roman Gofman, huddled in the Pentagon on July 9, 2025, with U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth just out of frame—a tableau of alliance forged in the forge of necessity. Israeli media had whispered of this exit as far back as October, murmurs that Dermer might linger for a final flourish of diplomacy before fading into the wings. Israel Hayom had noted he hadn't fixed a date, suggesting a man who, like the prophets of old, times his truths to the hour of greatest need.

Netanyahu, ever the survivor, responded with measured warmth: "Thank you, Ron, for your tremendous help to me and the state of Israel. I am sure you have much more to contribute in the future." It was the kind of valediction that hints at unfinished chapters, for in the theater of Jerusalem's corridors, no exit is ever truly final.

And yet, in Dermer's parting words, there echoes the eternal pulse of Jewish resolve, a coda that lifts the gaze from the immediate fray to the horizon of history. "For a hundred generations, Jews dreamed of a time when the Jewish people would have a sovereign state. Four generations have had the privilege of realizing this dream," he concluded. "With this blessing comes a sacred responsibility: to secure this dream for future generations. I feel immense gratitude that I had the privilege of serving the State of Israel and dedicating myself to this noble responsibility. 'On behalf of all the people of Israel, thank you!'"

Tributes poured in like libations at a solemn rite. Opposition leader Yair Lapid, no stranger to the fray, captured the essence of Dermer's legacy: "I have had, and still have, many disagreements with Ron Dermer, but I have never doubted that he is a Zionist and a patriot who wants what is best for the country. I thank him and wish him success in the future." Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, whose own vision for Israel's security burns with fervor, lauded him as "absolutely the right man in the right place, and this is true for every public role he has held so far." He evoked the late-night debates that forge steel: "Thank you for the joint work for the future of the State of Israel, thank you for hours of discussions and even disagreements when the goal was clear – preserving and strengthening Israel's civil security. The people of Israel owe you deep gratitude, and I have no doubt that in any role you choose, the people of Israel and the future of the State of Israel will always be in your sights. On behalf of all the people of Israel – thank you!"

Even National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, whose rhetoric cuts like a desert wind, offered a rare note of unity: "I would like to thank Ron Dermer for his great contribution to the people of Israel during these times. Wishing you great success, Ron."

In an age when Israel's enemies circle like vultures and its friends waver like reeds, Dermer's resignation is no mere administrative footnote. It is a mirror held up to a government scarred by October 7—a scar that, two and a half years on, still weeps across seven fronts. Yet in his grace and grit, Dermer reminds us that the Jewish state endures not by the machinations of men alone, but by the unquenchable fire of those who, generation after generation, dare to dream it into permanence.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. 

Tweet