Ilhan Omar's creds questioned by her hometown paper

Frick and Frack the Comedy Act

Did she marry her brother or didn't she? Did she get him into the USA under false pretenses, which is a crime? Are her anti-Semitic tropes because she hates Jews or is she just kidding around? What does her hairdresser really know about her hair? Why doesn't she protest her home country's anti-gay laws? Why did she laugh when talking about terrorist groups and why does she want lighter sentences for ISIS terrorists?

Yes, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is facing lots of questions and criticism and on Wednesday was the recipient of a blistering editorial in the Star Tribune, a Minnesota newspaper. All of this comes in the wake of her recent campaign finance violations -- with the paper suggesting that it was just the latest "misstep by the first-term congresswoman."

"U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar is back in the news again, and not in a good way," the editorial began. "The former state representative who won a seat in Congress last fall continues to be dogged by past missteps, this time eight violations of Minnesota campaign-finance law that will cost her nearly $3,500 in reimbursements and civil penalties."

And because she is clearly as guilty as Hillary and her magic server, she will pay back the money.

Minnesota campaign finance officials ruled last week that the lovely and talented anti-Semite owed her campaign committee almost $3,500, as well as a $500 civil penalty to the state, after using committee funds for personal travel and help on her tax returns.

As the Star Tribune noted, the state's Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board reported that Omar and her latest husband filed joint tax returns while she was married to another man who is alleged to be her brother.

Minnesota law only allows spouses to file jointly in civil marriages whereas Omar filed with a man with whom she was only married in "faith tradition." And Minnesota law frowns upon sibling marriage as it produces offspring with pointy heads known as future Democrats.

"It is even more disturbing, therefore, to learn that among the board’s latest findings ... Omar, for two years running, filed joint tax returns with a man she was living with but not legally married to [but was probably having a sexual relationship with]. Complicating matters further, she was legally married to another man at the time," the editorial read.

The paper also called on Omar to disclose whether she benefited materially from the filings. "That is something that voters, who are obliged to follow tax laws no matter how painful, are entitled to know," it read.

But it doesn't say anything about benefiting materially in sharia law, and that's the law she follows when it suits her, and taqiyya [google it] when it doesn't.

The incident was just one of many issues -- including collecting allegedly illegal speaking fees -- that could prompt an investigation, the paper said, not mentioning how Omar's speech sounds somewhat bizarre in its pitch and cadence.

"Omar’s political rise has been marred by a series of unforced errors," the paper also said, "including intemperate remarks and tweets earlier this year that were widely perceived as anti-Semitic. Every month seems to bring a fresh problem."

The main reason her remarks and tweets sound anti-Semitic is because she uses anti-Semitic tropes and attacks Israel, not for its policies, but for its people. That's kind of, you know, anti-Semitic.

But have hope, she's planning to join the Black-Jewish Caucus and if accepted, will be its first anti-Semite. However, it's a new organization and there may be more anti-Semites to follow. There are plenty in the Democratic Party to choose from.


Please consider following Brain Flushings and also visit the ads on the pages. Follow me on Parler.com, my handle is @Heyrobo, or on Twitter--my handle there is: @RobHoey
Thanks



Tweet