What is a best seller to the NY Times?

"All the News We See Fit to Print" has become the new New York Times slogan. The once upon a time paper of record, the "Old Gray Lady," has told HarperCollins that it will not include the biography of Ted Cruz on it forthcoming bestsellers list in spite of the fact that it is a best seller and their list is supposed to list best sellers. 

And why should it? We know The New York Times is so far left that it would allow Putin to ride it like a horse as long as he rode it shirtless.

It's bad enough that the media has become the PR agency of the left, but now it has decidedly become the propaganda arm of the progressives and leftists. I can't wait for next month's Bernie Sanders centerfold section.

Cruz's book has sold the third most copies in its first week and the New York Times refuses to acknowledge that fact. It is the epitome of irony when the truth scares the media, especially a newspaper that used to be a leader among its peers. 

HarperCollins asked the The New York Times about the omission of Cruz's book and the leftist rag responded: "We have uniform standards that we apply to our best seller list which includes an analysis of book sales that goes beyond simply the number of books sold."

That makes perfect sense--why should a best selling book actually be on the bestseller list just because it's a best seller if The New York Times does not want the author of the book to be read? 

Can you spell anarchy?


Tweet