The Times is Full of Crop

On the Fox News Website

The Gray Lady is at it as usual. The New York Times  reported on the march in Selma, Alabama on Sunday, commemorating the 50th anniversary reenactment of "Bloody Sunday" when Selma police clashed with protesters that day. 

Gracing the upper fold of the liberal rag was a photo of the marchers, starring Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barak Obama, aka Batak Obama, aka Barrack Obama--depending on which Social Security card he uses, since he had at least 22 in all) and the very right Reverend holy man of the cloth and racial leader of the entire black world, Alfred Charles Sharpton. 

The Four Race-Baiting Amigos

Not seen in the photo was an actual president of the United States, George W. Bush along with his wife Laura. "All the news that's fit to print" obviously doesn't include "all the photo that fits our agenda." The Times cropped them out of it.

Oh sure, they mentioned Mr. Bush's presence, but you had to dig deep into the paper to find it.

Imagine the honest impact the photo would have made if it showed a black president and a white president standing side-by-side. But it didn't fit the liberal agenda.

For his part, Eric Holder attacked the 2013 Supreme Court decision that invalidated part of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by a vote of 5-to-4. The vote allowed 9 southern states to change their election laws without advanced federal approval. In school, we called it "states" rights."

The main argument and core of the disagreement between parties was whether racial minorities continued to face barriers to voting in states with a history of racial discrimination.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote for the majority, "Our country has changed. While any racial discrimination in voting is too much, Congress must ensure that the legislation it passes to remedy that problem speaks to current conditions."

You may recall when, in Philadelphia, PA, voter registration was blocked by a group of men wielding sticks and intimidating white voters. This voter suppression was brought to Holder's attention and all we heard from the DoJ was crickets. There is a blatant double standard. The video doesn't lie, and Holder saw it.

And let's face it, if minorities suddenly began voting Republican, we would see no problems with voter suppression and our borders would be sealed.

Is The Times biased? 

Perhaps a better question would be: does The Times represent a pro-America point of view?

To make your own decision on that question, check out The Times reporting on the death of Alger Hiss, an admitted spy for the Soviet Union.

Tweet