Report details Biden Administration Weaponized Government

Joe Not-so Cool

A damning 17,000-page report from the House Select Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government has uncovered disturbing allegations against the Biden administration. The report exposes how it weaponized federal agencies for political gain.

The report paints a damning picture of a “two-tiered system of government” that targeted the Democratic Party’s enemies, censored views it didn’t like, and tried to sway public opinion.

One of the most concerning findings in the report is about how the administration used federal power to limit free speech. According to the report, agencies like the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) worked with Big Tech, Stanford University, and the Atlantic Council to silence different opinions through programs like the "Election Integrity Partnership." This "censorship-industrial complex" set up a system to control what was labeled as "mis-, dis-, or malinformation," which essentially meant the government was controlling what Americans could say.

The report also talks about how the FBI treated its whistleblowers badly. Agents who tried to reveal misconduct within the FBI were punished by being suspended without pay, not allowed to find work elsewhere, and in some cases, completely removed from their jobs. This really questions the honesty and responsibility of the FBI.

Then there's the issue of election interference.

The report shows how the Biden campaign worked with 51 former intelligence officials to call the Hunter Biden laptop story "disinformation" before the 2020 election, possibly swaying voters. This, according to the committee, not only misinformed the public but might have changed the election results.

While Democrats might challenge this report, Republicans have provided evidence. The report includes emails that reveal a planned censorship strategy with companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google.

🚨 @Weaponization releases 17,000-page staff report detailing the Select Subcommittee's findings about the Biden-Harris Administration's weaponized federal government.

Through its oversight and investigations, the Select Subcommittee found numerous instances of the federal…— House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@JudiciaryGOP) December 20, 2024

These abuses of power are unacceptable and demand immediate accountability. The committee has pledged to safeguard the rights of all Americans and restore neutrality and transparency to federal agencies. However, this investigation raises serious concerns about the health of democracy in the United States—which Democrats claim they want to protect—and the severe consequences of government overreach that isn't checked.

Tweet

The poverty of honesty of the SPLC

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) where honesty is their poverty and truth their nemesis, has been caught covering up evidence of anti-white hate being taught in American schools, as documented by Paul Sperry for The New York Post. 

SPLC released a report entitled "The Trump Effect: The Impact of the 2016 Presidential Election on Our Nation's Schools." 

It gathered and assessed data from about 10,000 educators of K-12 across the country concluding that "the results of the election are having a profoundly negative impact on schools and students" and that "ninety percent of educators report that school climate has been negatively affected, and most of them believe it will have a long-lasting impact."

The problem with the SPLC report was the fact that they were only interested in bigotry in one direction. Of the 10,000 teachers surveyed, "Four in 10 have heard derogatory language directed at students of color, Muslims, immigrants and people based on gender or sexual orientation."

SPLC asked whether or not respondents "have heard derogatory language or slurs about white students" but they did not include those answers in their report. Sperry requested the information from SPLC and their spokes-progressive Kirsten Bokenkamp told him that "about 20 percent answered affirmatively to that question."

So it was okay with SPLC to leave out 2,000 incidents of anti-white bias--that is disgusting.

SPLC says that it isn't a partisan organization and they are not a lobby group for the Democratic Party and don't exclusively champion Muslims and other minorities.

Anti-white hate doesn't work well for SPLC. "They left that result out because it would not fit their ideological narrative," Hans Bader, a former Education Department civil rights attorney told The New York Post. "It was deemed an inconvenient truth," he said.

SPLC is about as honest as a Hillary Clinton southern accent.


Tweet