BREAKING: FBI searched Melania's underwear drawer and wardrobe

FBI agents, behind closed doors, searched Melania Trump's "Make America Great Again" panty drawer at Mar-A-Lago, spending several hours sniffing for clues. Several pairs of her pink numbers were kept by agents as evidence, they claimed.

The agents also spent hours combing through every nook and cranny in former President Trump's private office hoping to find more items belonging to Melania Trump, but came up empty except for several personal photos of Melania that President Trump kept out on his desk.

They broke open his safe, rifled through his desk drawers and basically came up empty again.

One agent stuck his hand up to his elbow in every toilet in the estate, just in case something of importance was stuck inside. He came up with only one clue: Trump is definitely a meat eater.

According to the New York Post, the search warrant used by the Flatulent Blowhards Inc. to search the Palm Beach property of the former president of the United States, was focused only on presidential records and evidence of classified information being stored at the residence. So, it had nothing to do with the Jan, 6 story.

This is not the same situation as it was for Hillary Clinton who destroyed 33,000 subpoenaed documents on her computer, nor the late Sandy Berger, who, on July 19, 2004 was found to have removed and destroyed classified documents in October 2003 that the US Department of Justice was investigating. 

Berger got a fine of $50K and 2 years probation, while Hillary got millions for her BS foundation.

A source close to Trump was concerned the Flatulent Blowhards Inc. agents or DOJ lawyers conducting the search could have "planted stuff" because they refused Trump's attorneys entry into the 128 rooms being searched, which lasted over nine hours.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

If you don't think that the timing was just a little too "on the money" with the November midterms looming, you might not be paying attention.

Tweet

Ranking Judiciary Committee Republican wants an explanation by FBI of why they used force in Stone arrest

A ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA) questioned the FBI's stormtrooper tactics in their arrest of Roger Stone at his home in Florida on Wednesday, in a letter to FBI Director Chris Wray.

Stone is an elderly man with a tattoo of Richard Nixon on his back, and a longtime adviser and confidant of President Trump. The latter fact may be the key to the FBI tactics, but Wray will never say that, you can bet.

Collins as well as Sen. Lindsey Graham, (R-SC), are questioning the amount of force used in arresting the 66-year-old Stone at his home. They were just short of using a C4 charge on the door with guns blazing in spite of the fact that he was not deemed a flight risk [his passport has expired] and had already publicly stated that he expected to be indicted.

“Although none of the seven charges against Stone is considered to be a violent crime, the FBI demonstrated an immense show of force during an early-morning raid on Stone’s home,” Collins wrote in his letter to Wray. “Given the fact that the FBI is embroiled in a scandal related to the origins of this investigation, we are perplexed about why the FBI would use such a show of force in the arrest of an elderly man.”

Collins also points out that when Sen. Bob Menendez, (D-NJ), was indicted in 2015 on 14 charges – as with Stone, the charges included giving false statements – he and his lawyers were permitted to discuss and prepare how Menendez would voluntarily surrender.

Perhaps the "D" after his name can give us some indication.

In his letter, Collins asks Wray to clarify how far up the chain of command the knowledge of the raid and tactics used went, and whether the FBI had any discussions with Stone’s attorneys before the raid. He also asks if the FBI spoke to any media organizations ahead of the raid as a Comedy News Network (CNN) commentator was at the scene when the raid on Stone’s house went down and overheard his conversation with FBI agents.

What are the chances? The network claims they saw Grand Jury papers that led them to guess about Stone about to be raided, but those papers are confidential, even to the press, [although CNN doesn't fall into that category].

Collins joined a growing chorus of Republican lawmakers and strategists criticizing Stone's arrest, with former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie calling it “overkill” and downing a Whopper with a diet coke. 

A former FBI agent comparing the raid to a “pre-dawn ‘knock-and-announce’ arrest warrant of a meth lab somewhere in the United States.” Stone himself drew a parallel between the level of force displayed during his arrest and that used to capture alleged Mexican drug lord Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzman.

Mueller's team and Democratic lawyers with the U.S. attorney's office for the District of Columbia are jointly prosecuting the case against Stone in the hopes of getting some dirt on Trump. They did not push for Stone to be jailed or for U.S. Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson to impose a gag order in the case, but to get Stone to stop talking about anything would actually require a real gag.

Stone remains free on $250,000 bond.

I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet