Showing posts with label psychiatry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psychiatry. Show all posts

Friday, August 4, 2023

Women and Men are not the same: ask Israeli researchers, they now know the difference

Little Pokey, the Kosher mouse

This is a serious study, but c'mon, you know I had to mess around with my comments here and there. Please forgive me. In addition, it should be rather easy to see where my brain flushings jumped in.

Israeli and German researchers have discovered something we all knew while some of us refused to admit: male and female brains are affected differently by stress.

The brains of males and females respond differently to stress, while this may pave the way for personalized therapies regarding stress-related disorders.

In the world of today, stress is abundant and constantly getting worse, and this puts a serious strain on society, Stress affects both men and women, but differently and they deal with it differently, however the differences are not completely understood. Historically, lab mice used to study stress have used male mice, possibly leading to biases in the findings.

Scientists from Israel and Germany sought to address this problem by investigating how stress affects the sexes differently at the cellular level.

Israeli researchers working in the laboratory of Dr. Alon Chen of the Rehovot-based Weizmann Institute of Science were joined by German researchers from the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry and the Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology.

“Our findings show that, when it comes to stress-related health conditions, from depression to diabetes, it’s very important to take the sex variable into account, since it has a significant impact on how different brain cells respond to stress,” Chen explained.

Clinical trials were used up until the 1980s on men alone, as it was thought that using women in the trials was unnecessary, and would complicate the research as it would then bring into play new variables such as hormonal cycles and menstruation.

Dr. Elena Brivio led the researchers of the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry analyzing brain activity in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, a critical part of the central nervous system associated with the stress response. They used state of the art techniques that allowed them to examine gene expression on over 35,000 individual brain cells--around 34,980 more brain cells than is currently found in the White House. This technique provided never before seen detail into the differences between how males and females perceive and process stress.

“By sequencing the RNA [ribonucleic acid] molecules in that part of the brain on the level of the individual cell, we were able to map the stress response in male and female mice along three main axes: how each cell type in that part of the brain responds to stress, how each cell type previously exposed to chronic stress responds to a new stress experience and how these responses differ between males and females,” Dr. Brivio said.

The findings showed, among other things, that certain brain cells respond differently to stress in males and females. The most significant difference was found in a type of brain cell called the oligodendrocyte – a subtype of glial cell that provides support to nerve cells and plays an important role in regulating brain activity.

In males, exposure to stress conditions, especially chronic stress, changed not only the gene expression in the oligodendrocyte cells and their interactions with surrounding nerve cells but also their structure. In females, however, no significant change was observed in these cells, and they were not susceptible to stress exposure. However, the end result in humans showed that under great stress, men are more likely than women to use foul language, while woman were more likely to shop.

“Even if a study does not specifically focus on the differences between males and females, it’s essential to include female animals in the research, especially in neuroscience and behavioral science, just as it is important to implement the most sensitive research methods, in order to obtain as complete a picture of brain activity as possible,” Brivio said.


Saturday, September 3, 2022

Fired prof. loses bid to return to Yale after tweeting Trump voters had "shared psychosis"






Dr. Bandy Lee, a former professor of psychiatry at Yale failed to win her job back after she sued over her firing sparked by a tweet that Trump supporters suffer "shared psychosis" and claiming she had a "duty of care" to warn the public about Trump's "mental instability."

Lee filed a complaint last year claiming her free speech rights had been violated and her professional obligations to warn the public about Trump's "mental instability" while his supporters suffer from a "shared psychosis."

Having not performed a psychological assessment on Trump or all of his supporters, it seems that Lee is suffering from grandiose narcissism, but having not met her and put her through an assessment battery, I would not state that as fact. What I can state as a psychotherapist is that Lee misused her credentials and unethically diagnosed former President Trump and all of his supporters while having never performed the proper procedures to do so. Worse that this is the fact that she made public a psychiatric diagnosis on Twitter that seemed intentionally meant to stigmatize everyone who voted for Trump.

US District Judge Sarah Merriman dismissed the suit on Tuesday, siding with the university, saying it had the right to not reappoint Lee, a voluntary professor, after losing confidence in her professionalism following her controversial tweet, the Hartford Courant reported.

The tweet at the root of the lawsuit was posted on January 2, 2020, where she also targeted Alan Dershowitz, a member of Trump's legal team. Lee added that lawyer Alan Dershowitz, a member of Trump's legal team, had 'wholly taken on Trump's symptoms by contagion.' She basically diagnosed him as psychotic without having ever met him.


Lee has been a vocal critic of Trump for year. In a 2017 conference at Yale that resulted in the publication of her book, 'The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President.'

Again, having not met him for an assessment interview but based solely on his public persona.

In it, Lee suggested that Trump's mental health was undermining not only the nation's mental health, but also served as a threat to democracy.

Everything is a threat to democracy as you heard in Biden's speech on Sept. 1st. But the democracy the left refers to when they use that term is "mob rule." Everyone else in "flyover country" can whistle.

Lee also sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2019 claiming Trump was showing 'signs of delusion' amid his first impeachment inquiry.

Yale argued she repeatedly violated the American Psychiatric Association's Goldwater Rule, which states that it is unethical for psychiatrists to comment on a public figure's mental faculties in an official capacity unless granted permission or after a medical examination, neither of which she did.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Dr. John Krystal, the chair of Yale's Psychiatry Department, warned Lee to stop tweeting about Trump's mental health and that of his inner circle and supporters, by she couldn't help herself and continued to do so until she was let go.

If this is not a case of TDS [Trump Derangement Syndrome] I don't know what is, but having not actually met her and assessed her, I can only hazard a guess that she could be the poster person for the disorder.


Sunday, January 21, 2018

APA calls for end to 'arm chair' psychiatry

The American Psychiatric Association, the largest of its kind in the world, is calling for an end for people diagnosing people they don't like in absentia. In other words, they don't approve whatsoever of "arm chair" diagnosing such as we've seen the leftist media do with President Trump.

The APA released a statement earlier this month reaffirming its commitment to "The Goldwater Rule," which says that it's unethical for psychiatrists to diagnose public figures they have not personally examined.

And speaking of personally, I believe psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers who practice this quackery should lose their license and pay a fine.

In the case of Yale University psychiatry professor Dr. Bandy X. Lee, she claimed to have recently met with over a dozen Congress members to discuss the President's mental health, without having met Mr. Trump. Since Dr. Lee has no license to practice psychiatry, the fine should be greater since she has less to lose.

The APA argues that public speculating/diagnosing by psychiatrists "undermines the credibility and integrity of the profession and the physician-patient relationship."

In other words, the APA is hammering home the point that psychiatry is actually a real profession. 

"A proper psychiatric evaluation requires more than a review of television appearances, tweets, and public comments," the statement read. "Psychiatrists are medical doctors; evaluating mental illness is no less thorough than diagnosing diabetes or heart disease [as Sanjay Gupta did without actually meeting with the President]. The standards in our profession require review of medical and psychiatric history and records and a complete examination of mental status. Often collateral information from family members or individuals who know the person well is included, with permission from the patient.

"Using psychiatry for political or self-aggrandizing purposes is stigmatizing for our patients and negatively impacts our profession."

But it looks like Dr. Lee didn't get the message and went ahead anyway. 

Maybe Trump can sue her, as is his wont.



FBI Director turns table on Walz after viral tweet on MN fraud case

Minnesota Gov. Tim 'Rockette' Walz wasted no time sashaying in front of the cameras Tuesday to take credit for the federal fraud ra...