Showing posts with label Founding Fathers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Founding Fathers. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 17, 2025

Kathy Hochul invokes Founding Fathers to justify assisted suicide, proving she's not Mensa material



In what has to be one of the most tone-deaf moves from a Democratic governor in recent memory, New York's Kathy Hochul announced on Wednesday that she's reached a deal to sign legislation legalizing assisted suicide for terminally ill patients with less than six months to live. And she tried to justify it by dragging the Founding Fathers into the mix, of course.

"Two and a half centuries ago, our founding fathers established a vision of a country based on limited government and broad individual rights that together protect rights of speech, worship, privacy and bodily autonomy," Hochul wrote. "This is the context in which I have considered the Medical Aid in Dying Act, a bill to allow suffering terminally ill individuals with less than six months left to live the right to medical aid to speed up the inevitable."

Look, I'm all for limited government and individual rights, but twisting the Founders' vision to green-light doctors handing out fatal drugs feels like a stretch that would make even the most flexible yoga instructor wince. The Democrat-controlled legislature passed this over the summer, but Hochul held out for some revisions she claims will "protect family members, caregivers and doctors" and "ensure" the bill isn't "misused or broadly applied."

She says lawmakers agreed to those changes, which will be added in January, and then she'll sign it.

"I have come to see this as a matter of individual choice that does not have to be about shortening life but rather about shortening dying. And I do not believe that in every instance condemning someone to excruciating pain and suffering preserves the dignity and sanctity of life," she wrote.

The backlash was swift and fierce, starting with the New York State Republican Party calling it a flat-out disaster.

“At a moment when New Yorkers are struggling with isolation and mental health crises, she is choosing to tell the most vulnerable among us that their lives are expendable,” said New York GOP Chair Ed Cox. “This is not compassion, it’s abandonment. True leadership defends life, dignity and hope, even when it’s hard.”

Cox didn't stop there, urging voters to back Republican challengers like Elise Stefanik, who he says “believes every life has value and who will fight relentlessly for families, the disabled and the voiceless.”

The Bishops of New York State weren't holding back either.

“We are extraordinarily troubled by Governor Hochul’s announcement that she will sign the egregious bill passed by the legislature earlier this year sanctioning physician-assisted suicide in New York State,” they said. “This new law signals our government’s abandonment of its most vulnerable citizens, telling people who are sick or disabled that suicide in their case is not only acceptable, but is encouraged by our elected leaders.”

Then there's the New York Alliance Against Assisted Suicide, a coalition including disability rights groups, Democrats for Life, and others, who pointed out the obvious dangers.

“Even with changes, this legislation would still single out disabled and terminally ill New Yorkers for radically different treatment than other individuals experiencing suicidal ideation,” they said. “It would still transform physicians into facilitators of suicide. It would still undermine medical transparency by requiring false reporting on death certificates.”

If Hochul goes through with this, New York will join 12 other states plus D.C. in legalizing assisted suicide, hot on the heels of Illinois, where Democrat Gov. JB Pritzker just signed a similar bill.

At a time when suicide rates are climbing and mental health resources are stretched thin, pushing a law that tells the suffering their lives can be "expediently" ended isn't progressive—it's a profound moral surrender. Hochul's attempt to wrap it in the Founders' rhetoric only makes the hypocrisy sting more.

If you like Brain Flushings and want to Buy Me a Coffee, I would appreciate it, as it supports my work. Obviously, there is no pressure but I certainly wouldn't stop you. Imagine, you could be the first on your block to do that and your friends will thank you . . . for some reason.

Sunday, December 16, 2018

Trump may go the nepotism route: they all did it

President Trump is possibly considering appointing his son-in-law Jared Kushner as White House Chief of Staff, according to the Huffington Post.

Current Chief of Staff John Kelly is leaving the position by the end of the year, or possibly early next year, and the president is currently in search of his replacement.

“John Kelly will be leaving — I don’t know if I can say ‘retiring.’ But, he’s a great guy,” Trump said earlier this month. He says that about all the people he hires at first, but if they pull a "Michael Cohen" on him, well, not so much. [See Rex Tillerson; see Omarosa M. Newman.]

Kelly initially joined the Trump administration as Department of Homeland Security secretary. He replaced former Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus as chief of staff in July 2017, Fox News reported.

According to the Huffington Post, a “top Republican close to the White House” leaked that Kushner is interested in the chief of staff position.

If he does select his son-in-law, don't let the cries of nepotism fool you--JFK did it with Bobby as his AF, Bill Clinton, because nepotism goes back to the Founding Fathers of this country.

On Thursday, the president told reporters Thursday that he has his list of potential candidates down to five finalists. Perhaps he plans to trot them out in front of the cameras and have the studio audience guess which one is his choice, to add to the drama.

“We are interviewing people now for chief of staff,” Trump said, according to the Post.

Nick Ayers, who is the current chief of staff for Vice President Mike Pence, was also believed to be at the top of Trump’s list but he announced on Twitter that he plans to leave the White House and return to Georgia at the end of the year to have a life.

Ayers tweeted:
Thank you @realDonaldTrump, @VP, and my great colleagues for the honor to serve our Nation at The White House. I will be departing at the end of the year but will work with the #MAGA team to advance the cause. 🇺🇸 #Georgia
— Nick Ayers (@nick_ayers) December 9, 2018

The president debunked claims that Ayers had been chosen for the position on Twitter in order to seem as if no one ever turns him down. He tweeted:

“I am in the process of interviewing some really great [aka: tremendous] people for the position of White House Chief of Staff,” Trump wrote. “Fake News has been saying with certainty it was Nick Ayers, a spectacular person who will always be with our #MAGA agenda. I will be making a decision soon!”

Despite the Huffington Post’s [often fake news] report, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said she was not aware of Kushner’s consideration for the position, the Washington Examiner reported.

Well, it's anyone's guess as to who will be Trump's pick. Will it be Jared? Ivanka? Ben Shapiro?

Who do you think will take the White House Oscar? Please comment below.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do. 

I hope you have a wonderful Christmas.




Convicted Teen Killer Claims He's Penniless, Seeks Taxpayer-Funded Lawyer As Parents Quietly Fire Up New Business Three Weeks After Fatal Stabbing

MCKINNEY, TX — In a plot twist no one could have predicted except everyone paying attention, Karmelo Anthony , the 19-year-old just handed a...