Mike Howell, president of the Oversight Project and a man who appears convinced that the plot has barely begun, suggested that more revelations could be on the way. "I think there's other shoes that are going to drop here," he warned. Washington may soon need a much larger closet.
Howell also took aim at Democrats who rushed to Omar’s defense before the public had seen the evidence. "That's why I think the Democrats really just couldn't resist the temptation to jump out of this before they saw any evidence and just circle the wagons [around Omar]." Apparently, congressional solidarity now comes with an express shipping option, allowing lawmakers to deliver their verdicts before investigators finish gathering the paperwork.
![]() |
| Mike Howell |
Howell added that the Democrats’ arguments suggest it is "not all peaches and cream underneath the hood," a diagnosis that would make a mechanic nervous and a congressional ethics lawyer reach for the antacids. Whatever lies beneath the political paint job, Howell believes the public has reason to look more closely.
Then came the question of why a federal judge would approve a search warrant in Washington, D.C., a city where legal scrutiny and political influence routinely compete for the same parking space.
Howell offered a remarkably direct explanation: "They probably got the goods on her."
He expanded on that assessment by observing, "You don't get a federal judge to sign off on something like this in Washington, D.C., of all places, unless there is something that is rather convincing."
It is an argument that leaves little room for the usual Washington ritual of pretending that a judicial warrant is merely a clerical misunderstanding. Of course, a warrant is not proof of guilt, and the investigation must establish whether any laws were broken. But the fact that a judge approved the warrant raises questions that cannot be answered simply by assembling a congressional protection squad and declaring the matter politically inconvenient.
Howell also explained how his organization began examining local nonprofit earmarks, describing the process with the sort of understated simplicity that rarely survives contact with Washington’s public relations machinery. "We said, let's go check out those earmarks."
A radical concept, apparently: examine where public money goes, determine who benefits, and ask whether taxpayers are getting anything in return. Somewhere in the federal bureaucracy, a filing cabinet just slammed shut.
Finally, Howell broadened his criticism to the obligations lawmakers accept when they swear an oath to the Constitution. His assessment was blunt: "This isn't normal. And it only seems normal because it's been happening so much. And I think it's about time we take the oath to the Constitution that members swear seriously,"
He followed that statement with an even sharper conclusion: "If somebody has loyalties to another place, they should not be in Congress."
And Omar had admitted her loyalty to Somalia in the past.
That is a serious charge, and it deserves serious scrutiny rather than automatic acceptance or reflexive dismissal. Allegations about divided loyalties must be supported by evidence, not political insinuation. But the principle itself should not be controversial: members of Congress owe their allegiance to the United States Constitution and their duty to the American people, not to foreign governments, outside interests, or political factions demanding unconditional protection.
For now, the investigation continues, the political defenses are firmly in place, and Washington’s familiar cast of characters is busy insisting that everyone else is either corrupt, confused, or conspiring against democracy.
The public, meanwhile, is left waiting for the evidence, the answers, and whatever footwear Howell believes is still airborne.
Stay tuned. In Washington, the subpoenas may be serious, the accusations may be consequential, and the congressional outrage is practically guaranteed to arrive before the facts.
Hey patriots! Please take time to give a click on the ads on this page--it's one way to support my work and you don't need to purchase anything just to look. Of course, you can Buy Me A Coffee at any amount if you want to support me directly, but no pressure. And finally, consider subscribing if you enjoy the blog--it's free, and totally worth the cost.



No comments:
Post a Comment