Obama: Shooting possibly terror-related, probably just a workplace disagreement

If the Muslim terrorists stormed a Christmas party, screamed "Allahu Akbar!" adding "Allah is great!" in English (just in case your Arabic is rusty) and began shooting unarmed non-Muslims, then screamed as they fired that all infidels must die in the name of jihad, and there were at least three videos of the event, maybe then Obama would admit that it was a terrorist attack and not workplace violence.

But even then, I'm not sure he would.

The San Bernadino attack by a Muslim husband and wife team, dressed in military-type assault, load-bearing garb, carrying AK 47-style weapons with hundreds of available rounds, and two pistols, killed 14 and wounded about 20. 

Pipe bombs were found in their rented apartment along with material for building more bombs, and thousands of rounds of ammunition.

The wife handed over their 6-month-old baby to the grandparents just prior to the attack because jihadists don't bond well with actual innocent humans, even after jihadist mothers breastfeed them. Farooq, the husband, grew a "Mohammad-style" beard (sans mustache), and became increasingly more Islamic it was reported.

The attack was probably not an attack on co-workers. The attack was on Christmas itself. Just like the attacks ISIS is boasting to carry out on the Pope, the USA, and of course, Israel.

In spite of this, Obama said Thursday that it was merely possible the mass shooting was a terror attack. It has gotten to the point where Obama has gone beyond not saying the words "radical Islamic terror" attack. Now he has dropped the word "terror" from describing radical Islamic terror attacks unless it is unequivocally proven to be so--unless, of course, there is some kind of verbal loophole that can get him out of saying that.

His "go-to" position is workplace violence, like he did with the Soldier of Allah, Nadal Hassan, of Fort Hood shooting notoriety. 

His other "go-to" position was to call for more gun control, as if that would have prevented the killings. If the shooters were white, that would have been another "go-to," or if they were members of the NRA, or Christian or hard right wing conservatives. 

But since they were Muslims, blame the guns. Never, under any circumstances, blame the religion of peace.

Even the term 'religion of peace' has become a sardonic joke, much like our so-called president.

Of course it's possible there were different motives behind this horrible slaughter, but I would look at it as a radical Muslim terrorist attack first, and rule out the possibility of workplace violence--not use it as my first hypothesis.

Tweet