Malala attack was "scripted" Pakistani lawmaker says

(Photo: AFP)

Islamabad: A Pakistani woman lawyer and parliamentarian claims that the 2012 Taliban attack on Malala Yousafzai was "scripted." Malala, who, much like Bono, Cher, Prince and Madonna, goes by her first name, won a Nobel Peace Prize for allegedly being shot in the head as a female. 

She is, for sure, a media cash cow.

Mussarat Ahmadzeb, from Imran Khan-led Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, claims the saga of Malala writing for BBC and later the attack were part of a plan.

"The attack on Malala was scripted way before the incident (in 2012)," Ahmadzeb told Ummat, a right-wing newspaper. She is the daughter-in-law of former head of semi-autonomous state of Swat (Babe Ruth was its Sultan). She doubts that any bullet was lodged in Malala's head.

"She (Malala) was shot in the head but no bullet was found in the Computerized Tomography (CT) scan in Swat. But yes, then the bullet got stuck in her head in CMH (Combined Military Hospital) Peshawar," she later tweeted.

Ahmadzeb also claimed that medics who were involved in Malala's treatment were given land by the government. "The medics who did the CT scan along with the doctor who examined her, all were awarded plots by the government," she said.

Another claim the lawmaker said was that Malala was illiterate when she was shown as writing stories for BBC as Gul Makai. According to Ahmadzeb, an American lived in Malala's house for three months to train her for her future role.

It wasn't clear why Ahmadzeb made the claims about Malala.

A PTI spokesperson, Shafqat Mahmood, said that his party had disowned Ahmadzeb in 2014 with two other lawmakers for violating party discipline.

"During the protest against election rigging, three MNAs (Members of National Assembly)--Mussarat Ahmadzeb, Gulzar Ahmed and Siraj Muhammad--refused to abide by party laws (and were disowned)" Mahmood told the media.

Malala, who is now 19, became a global symbol for girls education after she was shot in the head in October 2012 for opposing Taliban restrictions on female education. She survived the attack (if, indeed, there really was an attack) and became an advocate for girls who are denied formal education because of their gender and how Islam views women as lesser than men.

In 2013, Yousafzai and her father Ziauddin Yousafzai co-founded the Malala Fund to bring awareness to the social and economic impact of girls education, and to empower girls to demand change. 

Malala became the youngest Nobel Peace Prize laureate in December 2014. Barack Obama became the first American president to win the same prize for saying stuff. 










Tweet

Navy SEAL still thinks Katy Perry should go to hell

When people say really stupid things, they should be held accountable for their statements. Former Navy SEAL Carl Higby told Katy Perry to go to hell and came under fire for it. But Navy SEALs don't back down and he doubled down on his words as a guest on Fox News on Thursday.

Originally, Higby told Perry to go to hell over her asinine comments she made about the terrorist bombing in Manchester, UK.

Perry  naively said that we all need to coexist, have open borders, show each other love and that would make the terrorists love us.

Higby told The Daily Caller he didn't go too far in the interview when others pushed back on him.

"No, I'm doubling down," he said. "The problem is that Katy Perry lives in a bubble. She influences millions of young children who believe everything that comes out of her mouth. It's irresponsible of her to say something like this, when she has no understanding of the situation. Open borders would be a disaster."

Higbie correctly believes the American public are mesmerized by entertainers. He thinks it's driving people to Hollywood for answers rather than the media.

"People are captivated by pop culture," he said.

"It's remarkable that people like Katy Perry and Kim Kardashian have multiple times the amount of followers as the Speaker of the House. Entertainers are not meant to inform--that isn't their job."

Yeah, tell that to Stephen Colbert and Al Franken.



Tweet

Chelsea: same old tune, but more boring

Following in her mother's footsteps, Chelsea Clinton wins awards for such things as changing oxygen into carbon dioxide and smiling with that toothy smile. Soon it's expected she'll win the Nobel Peace Prize for being the daughter of Bill Clinton and for defending Islam against the Islamophobes on the right side of the aisle.

Chelsea's on the speaking circuit hawking her children's book about her award winning mother, She Persisted. Many believe the biggest problem with Hillary Clinton is the fact that she's still around persisting and persisting.

On Monday, Chelsea appeared at the annual conference for Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere (CARE, not CAIR, but close). The conference 'kiss-ups' described her in the agenda, not as a Howdy Doody lookalike, but as an "activist, thought leader and change agent."

Chelsea spoke about empowering and the oppressed, which should have a sound as familiar as an emetic, but with which Chelsea has zero practical experience.

One point made perfectly clear by the 'hate child' of the Clintons is that if you don't agree with every progressive point she spouts, you are an evil, suck-worthy person, probably an Islamophobic, gay-bashing white man who want to see women not have the right to chose death for their unborn baby, although she didn't put it in exactly those words.

However, she did make it clear that she wanted those who disagree to be silenced.

"I think though that we also have to recognize particularly at this moment that sexism is not an opinion, Islamophobia is not an opinion, racism is not an opinion, homophobia is not an opinion, jingoism is not an opinion," she blathered.

No, all of those things are what she says they are. If Chelsea calls you a homophobe, it's simply a fact, not an opinion. If she calls you an Islamophobe, that's what you are.

Basically, what she's saying is that those she considers to be any of the above, which usually translates to anyone moderate-to-right-of-center, lacks the right to speak their minds.

Not only is this elitist, but it's unconstitutional. You know, that old, worn out document the left hates.

Except her mommy and daddy were once opposed to gay marriage and were strongly against "don't ask, don't tell" policy keeping gays from open service in the military. They also were once against Islamic fundamentalism, but hey, times change.

Ms. Doody was asked to speak about "global poverty." Somehow she managed to connect global warming with child marriage, a practice often associated with Islamic culture and backward countries, hardly countries that create extreme temperatures and rising ocean tides.



Maybe she's the one who's Islamophobic after all. 

But CARE is a foreign aid proponent and socialist organization that believes in the redistribution of wealth other than that belonging to the Clintons and other wealthy socialists. 

They just sat there and listened like good little socialists.


Tweet

Chinese jets buzz U.S. plane near Hong Kong

Two Chinese fighter jets buzzed a U.S. Navy P-3 surveillance plane on Friday. Flying about 150 miles southeast of Hong Kong in international airspace, the J-10 jets came within 2 football fields away from our aircraft. That's close in aviation terms--very close.

A U.S. official said the jets were "unsafe" in the action they took, but we will not do anything about it other than scold them. One of the Chinese jets flew out in front of the Navy plane and then did a series of slow turns--their way of "flipping the bird" to us. In effect, they cut the plane off like a car might do on a highway at fast speed.

According to one U.S. official, the action occurred before one of our Navy destroyers, the USS Dewey, sailed within six nautical miles of the contested Mischief Island, in the South China Sea early Thursday.

The previous week, two Chinese fighter jets intercepted a U.S. radiation-sniffing surveillance plane over the East China Sea with an "unprofessional" maneuver, according the U.S. Air Force.

It's good to know the Chinese flyers are amateurs, just in case we have to shoot them down in the future.


Tweet

Pelosi attacks Trump for not visiting countries in alphabetical order

Seriously--Nancy Pelosi has lost it. Nothing that President Trump does will ever get a free pass. 

If Trump cured cancer, Pelosi would complain about all the oncologists he put out of business and ruined their lives.

In a Thursday press conference, Pelosi criticized President Trump's decision to visit Saudi Arabia first during his inaugural foreign trip. Part of the reason for her discontent is the fact that she's an idiot.

"I thought it was unusual for the President of the United States to go to Saudi Arabia first. Saudi Arabia!" she said, moving her hands rapidly to dry her nail polish.

"It wasn't even alphabetical. I mean, Saudi Arabia."

She really meant Saudi Arabia. 

The House Minority Leader contrasted Trump's visit to George W. Bush's first visit to Mexico; Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Obama visiting Canada first.

Pelosi, who may be suffering from an organic disorder, said, "Our friends and neighbors. Was the decision-making process to go to Saudi Arabia first? That is a question I have."

So President Trump should have gone to Afghanistan first, not Saudi Arabia.

Honestly, she really is an idiot.



Follow Brain Flushings by clicking the Follow tab in the margin.



Tweet

Abedi: "Forgive me, Mommy"

Salman Abedi, 22, evidently called his mommy just hours before the attack in Manchester to say "forgive me," a Special Deterrent Force spokesman, Ahmed bin Salem reported from Libya.

Personally, I don't give a rat's, and if his mother forgave him for what he was about to do, she's no better than him.

I don't care that he even has a mother, nor do I care if he had a rough childhood. I simply don't care to try explaining why he killed 22 people and changed the lives of over 100 others. 

He is an evil loser and I would have been happy to kill him myself.

"He was giving farewell," bin Salem said. They believe he was acting alone based on what his father, told investigators.

Other terror links involving Salman's relatives were disclosed Wednesday. His father, Ramadan was a member of the  Al Qaeda-backed Libyan Islamic Fighting group in the 1990s, said former security official Abdel-Basit Haroun. Ramadan denied the claim in a taqiyya move that would make the prophet proud.

Salman's brother, Hashim, was linked to ISIS and may have been planning an attack in Tripoli. 

In other words, this terrorism thingy is a family affair.

Salman left Libya for Manchester four days prior to the bombing, his mommy said. His parents claim they had no idea that he was going to kill infidels and he fooled them into thinking he was heading off to the Hajj in Mecca to walk around the Kaaba "and meet Muslim chicks."

Instead, the scumturd went to Turkey and Germany,  apparently merely stopping in those countries for transfers and actually flew to Istanbul (which was once Constantinople) on May 18th then left for Dusseldorf, a Turkish official told the Associated Press, also saying that Abedi had previously used Istanbul as a transfer point for flights between Libya and Europe.

Evidently, the terrorist was not on an international terror watch list, so he was able to travel freely throughout Europe.

And leftists keep stopping President Trump from allowing the 90-day travel ban that which includes Libya.

Since the attack, British Transport Police announced that armed officers will patrol some UK trains for the first time beginning Thursday afternoon due to the increased threat of future attacks. Still, regular British police do not carry guns because they might be able to defend themselves and others if they did, which would level the field. 

On Wednesday, authorities raided an apartment where they believed Abedi visited before he went on his jihad--it was advertised to be an "ideal" place to stay due to its location next to the Manchester arena. 

Before he blew himself up, he had gone to the apartment at about 7:00 p.m., which was about three hours prior to the attack.

Police raced to uncover the network Abedi belonged to, and believed it clearly exists. But on Thursday, authorities reckoned he could have made the device himself as it was not as sophisticated as they first thought.

Photos of the bomb were prematurely released by The New York Times, which upset British authorities because of the disrespect it showed to the families of the victims as well as possibly alerting others in the network.

Thus far, eight people have been arrested and the terrorism threat level in Britain has been raised to "critical." Thus, another attack could be imminent. 

ISIS has claimed responsibility for the attack, but they would claim responsibility for any attack. Overall, it doesn't matter if it's ISIS, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda or Yadda Yadda. It's all about jihad, folks.

Welcome to the Ramadan Bombathon, which begins tonight in the West.



Tweet

CNN is Certainly Not News, as usual

A stammering British CNN analyst (with emphasis on 'anal') Paul Cruickshank suggests that the jihad massacre might well be a "right wing false flag plot," not the work of a real Muslim. 

It seems like the establishment media will say anything to keep Islamic terrorism out of the discussion. 

An article titled "In Absurd Pivot, CNN Suggests Manchester Was Right Wing False Flag" in the Daily Caller by Amber Randall, discusses how during Anderson "Eyes to Sky" Cooper's AC360, so-called terror analyst Paul Cruickshank said that a suicide bomber was probably responsible for the explosion, BUT the whole thing could have been part of a right wing extremist plot.

Yes, and it could have been an Amish plot, or a Jewish plot to make Muslims look bad.

"It must also be noted that in recent months in Europe, there's been a number of false flag plots where right wing have been trying to blame Islamists for terrorism. We have seen that in Germany in recent weeks." 

That isn't exactly fake news; it's slanted like crazy news. But it's obvious why the media is losing more and more to other forms of news outlets. 

Maybe it's all President Trump's fault. Yeah, that's the ticket.



Tweet

Manchester mayor Andy Burnham denies Islamic terrorist was a Muslim

This is what a useful idiot looks like

What is a Muslim?

It is a person who believes in the teachings of the Koran, the Islamic holy book, and that there is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is his messenger. That is what best describes a Muslim.

Salman Abedi, the Manchester terrorist who blew himself to bite-size bits in order to kill others, was described as a "devout" Muslim, a hafiz, in fact--which is someone who has completely memorized the Qur'an. 

But Manchester mayor Andy Burnham thinking he's an imam--says that Abedi was not a Muslim. 

What do you base that stupid assumption on, Andy? 

Is it because Abedi's jihad, in which he committed mass murder, was un-Islamic since Islam is a Religion of Peace? In other words, when a Muslim commits an act of violent jihad, he loses the label of Muslim because you are so afraid of being called Islamophobic that you will deny Islam is involved. Thus, Islam is always seen as good and peaceful, no matter what is committed in its name.

Useful idiots like Andy Burnham don't have to hold any responsibility or knowledge of the goals of Islam and how jihadists attempt to realize those goals.

Of course Abedi was a Muslim. Yes, he was an extremely orthodox Muslim, but a Muslim nevertheless. 

Speaking to Nick Ferrari on LBC, Burnham said, "The message that I would want to get over--and this is how the vast majority of people feel--this man was a terrorist, not a Muslim." 

The terms are not mutually exclusive, but Burnham wants us to believe they are.

He goes on: "He does not represent the Muslim community. We've got to keep that distinction in mind all the time. This was an unspeakable act."

Yes--dare not speak about it--that's the ticket.

"The worst thing that can happen is that people use this to blame an entire community, the Muslim community."

When has this ever happened? Nobody ever blames the entire Muslim community, but those of us familiar with Islam are quite clear that jihad has everything to do with Islam. 

"In my view," the useful idiot went on, "the man who committed this atrocity no more represents the Muslim community than the individual who murdered my friend Jo Cox represents the white, Christian community."

The Christian community doesn't kill people in the name of Jesus. The Muslim jihadist, not the community, kills in the name of Allah and in the name of Mohammed. 

Burn a Bible and a Qur'an and see the difference in communities.

Politicians always seem to have a way to use moral equivalency with Christians every time a Muslim commits a violent act.

The politicians are the real cowards--not the Muslim lunatics who commit these violent acts in the name of their religion.



Tweet