Alexandria Occasional-Cortex doubles-down on Jesus with migrant comparison in bizarre photo mimicking Mary and Joseph

A look that says: "Just wait until my
coronation"

Rep. - elect Alexandria Occasional-Cortex (D-NY) made a stupid comment about Jesus Christ being a refugee. She obviously doesn't know about the census in Judea and why Mary and Joseph made the journey.

Now she's doubling-down about their refugee status, and on Christmas night, the 29-year-old low-information socialist uploaded a photo that mimicked the religious iconic photo of Jesus with his parents, Joseph and Mary.

The darling of the dems and former barkeeper tweeted:

“True love is radical because it requires us to see ourselves in all people. Otherwise, it isn’t love. Love is revolutionary because it has us treat ALL people as we would ourselves – not because we are charitable, but because we are one. That is love’s radical inclusion,” 

She seems to be arguing that Christian love is comparable to poor immigration enforcement made in response to President Trump's law abiding immigration policies and his comments about stopping the migrant caravans from illegally entering the United States.

Occasional-Cortex evidently believes the Trump administration is betraying Christian principles through its immigration policy.

In an IJR interview with Father Frank Pavone of Priests for Life, he called such criticisms totally false.

“The Bible does not have an immigration policy,” Pavone said,  and explained that the Bible affirmed migrants’ dignity as persons, but also emphasized the importance of borders.

“The idea of borders and the idea of nations having borders is very biblical,” Fr. Pavone added and said that politicians should consider more than just “welcoming the stranger” when creating immigration policies.

On Tuesday, the incoming Rep. called Jesus a “refugee” on Christmas as a way to speak positively about refugees, because she doesn't know her elbow from her nether regions.

“Joy to the World! Merry Christmas everyone – here’s to a holiday filled with happiness, family, and love for all people,” she tweeted, adding in parentheses, “Including refugee babies in mangers + their parents.”

She was referring to the biblical account of Jesus’ birth in a stable manger, but in true Ocasio-Cortez fashion, she got the story completely wrong.

As noted by Luke 2: 1-6, Jesus wasn’t a “refugee.”

And it came to pass in those days that a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This census first took place while Quirinius was governing Syria. So all went to be registered, everyone to his own city. Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be registered with Mary, his betrothed wife, who was with child. So it was, that while they were there, the days were completed for her to be delivered.

The Gospel of Matthew explicitly states that Mary and Joseph traveled to Egypt with the infant Jesus after King Herod of Judea ordered all boys under the age of two to be killed in Bethlehem.

When the family arrived in Bethlehem, Mary and Joseph registered for the census. They weren’t refugees or illegal aliens, they were obeying the law and immigrating legally.

Because obeying the law is the Christian thing to do, not the other way around.

Hello fellow conservatives. At this time of year when everyone has a hand out for a hand-out, I don't. I simply want you to follow Brain Flushings and check out the ads on this page. It's free, I'm free and you're free to follow me or not. I hope you do.



Tweet

Liars Kamala Harris and Planned Parenthood get caught taking Kavanaugh out of context

Politician Kamala Harris (D. Calif.) and abortion factory Planned Parenthood have been slammed for lying about Judge Brett Kavanaugh by omitting words he used in a statement about birth control during the SCOTUS confirmation hearing.

Harris and the abortion factory accused Kavanaugh of describing contraceptives as "abortion-inducing drugs." He never said that--he was summarizing the position of a pro-life group.

The charge came Thursday when Kavanaugh was asked about a case that involved Priests for Life, a group challenging Obamacare's contraceptive mandate that violated their religious beliefs.

"That was a group that was being forced to provide certain kind of health coverage over their religious objection to their employees. And under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the question was first, was this a substantial burden on the religious exercise? And it seemed to me quite clearly it was," Kavanaugh explained.

He continued, "It was a technical matter of filling out a form in that case. In that case, they said filling out the form would make them complicit in the provision of the abortion-inducing drugs that they were, as a religious matter, objected to" [my italics].

So what did Harris and anti-Kavanaugh liars do? They seized on the words "abortion-inducing drugs" but edited a video cutting out his reference of "they said," and that it was not his view he was referring to. She and Planned Parenthood were hoping nobody would notice--after all, they were only two words.

Harris claimed Kavanaugh chose his words carefully saying, "This is a dog whistle for going after birth control," implying that if she can hear it as such, she must be a canine.

"He was nominated for the purpose of taking away a woman's constitutionally protected right to make her own health care decisions," the tweet said, referring to a mother's right to kill her unborn baby. "Make no mistake--this is punishing women." Of course the mistake that was made was by Harris because Kavanaugh never said those words.

Overwhelmingly, abortions are not "health care decisions." They are most often used as birth control. The 3 most common reasons for abortions are:

1. Negative impact on the mother's life. 

2. Financial instability

3. Relationship problems/unwillingness to become a mother

Health care for the mother is bull crap, but the claim is that having the child will cause emotional harm on the mother, and the abortions are then allowed.

Planned Parenthood [which is an oxymoron when you think of it--they should be called "Planned Singlehood"] in a press release, also somehow left out the words "they said," and later acknowledged the "error," according to the Compromised News Network (CNN). But they still had the audacity to say that Kavanaugh used what they thought was suspect language.

But of course, they weren't specific in what gave them that "thought."

Have you noticed that mistakes only go against the right and never the left?

The fact that the video was selectively edited to leave out those crucial two words is not a mistake by any stretch of the condom.

White House Deputy Spokesman Raj Shah, [an Indian, and a member of the racial group that Joe Biden spoke about regarding their accent] said the video was an "obvious act of deception."

Of course it was.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) said the controversy was proof that Kavanaugh had performed well at the hearing.

"If Senate Democrats are resorting to editing videos of Judge Kavanaugh's answers to make him look bad, then he mush have done well," Hatch tweeted.


Please follow Brain Flushings and take a moment to visit the sponsors on this page. Thank you.




Tweet