Love > Hate |
Very mature. Very mature.
Sure, there were hoards of royalty fanatics to Windsor Castle. They came from all over the place to see the royal wedding. But did British author Rowling have to rub it in?
You can't blame President Trump for the people who failed to show up for his inauguration. Whether or not to attend an event is an individual decision and let's face it, a presidential inauguration is a lot less interesting and less romantic than a royal wedding.
It's clear that Donald Trump is renting space in Rowling's brain. She is even compared Trump's hairdo to Meghan Markle's hairdo. But insofar as the wedding vs. inauguration, Rowling posted side-by-side photos of the crowds that attended each event and tweeted next to the image, "Love > Hate."
Very mature. Very mature.
Anyway, Rowling received over 40,000 likes and 8,000 retweets.
After she tweeted, BBC Three mimicked her and tweeted the same comparison photo of the wedding crowd and Trump's inauguration switched around and wrote: "Just saying :)" This tweet gained over 90,000 likes and 34,000 retweets.
It seems as if Rowling is as guilty of hate as she accuses Trump and his supporters to be.
Facts don't care about J.K. Rowling's feelings, however, it turns out that while 100,000 people visited Windsor for the royal wedding festivities, Trump had between 300,000 to 600,000 people attending his swearing in, according to Vox.
I know that if President Trump discovers Rowling's tweet, he will take to Twitter to point this out to her.
Very mature. Very mature.
No comments:
Post a Comment