Denis McDonough, White
House Chief of Staff, has a daunting job to do on the Sunday morning talk
shows: to convince the war-weary, administration-weary public to take punitive
action against Syria’s Assad regime. President Obama did a policy flip when he
decided at the last minute to ask for congressional approval of getting the US
involved in the Syrian civil war. But as it turns out, President Obama wants it
both ways: if congress goes along with their constituency and votes against
hitting Syria with “a shot across the bow,” he said that he might go ahead
anyway. If they vote for it, he will look like an actual leader rather than an
amateur at the helm, steering the ship of the nation into the iceberg. But the
thing that makes McDonough’s task the most daunting is the fact that when Obama
had an administration mouthpiece, Susan Rice, speak for him on the Sunday
morning talk show, it was about a lie the administration tried to perpetrate
on the American public. Ironically, Susan Rice will also be called upon to push
for public support when she speaks at the New America Foundation this Monday.
We know that the
American public is not stupid, at least those of us who see through Obama’s
smokescreen. “I didn’t draw the red line, the world drew it.” Obama would have
us believe his words today rather than what he said on August 20, 2012. Please,
Barack Obama, it’s on video; we saw it and we heard it. You said it and you did
it in a very personal way. So unless you’re saying that you now speak for the
entire world, own up to your words like a man—or is that asking too much?
Only France supports
our plan for a military strike—it doesn’t get funnier than that. Obama, who
seems to think the United Nations should dictate America’s policies, has not
received their support for a strike, and the president doesn’t seem to
care—Obama wants to do what Obama wants to do.
For an administration
that failed to react to protect our men in Benghazi, I have no faith that Obama
has the ability to effect a good outcome with Syria. It almost seems as if
Obama would have the Muslim Brotherhood in power in Syria as he does in Egypt.
He is notorious for supporting the wrong team; think Solyndra, Chevy Volt,
immigration reform without enforcement. I have no proof but I wouldn’t be at all
surprised if Obama would support sharia law over the Constitution—he tries to
go around it all the time except now, with Syria.
A few people,
including John McCain, have said that if Obama strikes at Syria even if
congress does not approve this measure, he should be up for impeachment
proceedings. Personally, I would have called for those proceedings a while ago
when he supported the Muslim Brotherhood and invited those scum-sucking
terrorists into our White House.
Obama’s incompetence
knows no bounds and his allegiance to the United States is not clear to me. His
father was a Muslim and a communist, his step-father was a Muslim and a
communist, his mother and his “Uncle Frank [Davis Marshall]” were communists.
His mentor, Saul Alinsky, was a flaming socialist guru for social change
through devious tactics, and Obama has shown us that he was a good student. Is
Obama a communist or socialist? Who knows, but I believe there’s a better
chance that he is a socialist than the chance that Solyndra would have been a
success if the taxpayers just threw them more money.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment