The New York Times has always been a left-leaning pretentious rag that used to be taken seriously, like CNN did years ago. But in the aftermath of their false reporting that lied saying the Israeli Defense Forces bombed al-Arabi Hospital in Gaza, supposedly killing about 500 innocent civilians, nobody with a clear mind thinks they're anything but a shill for the left, the far-left, and the socialists.
To think that this rag would run with the Hamasshole narrative that "the Jews" bombed a hospital intentionally before verifying the story, has taken their credibility to depths of life's cesspool. And of course, the story was totally debunked, yet the anti-Semites in the world don't want to hear that.
Fact is, Palestinian Islamic Jihad fired a barrage of rockets at Israel and one fell short into the hospital parking lot where some cars caught on fire likely from fuel spillage caused by the relatively small explosion. There was no damage to the hospital indicating a hit of any kind, no great number of injured, although people likely were injured, and a body count by Hamas that seemed to have been done by a dollar bill counting machine at a bank.
So X, formerly Twitter, removed Times' verification badge. What the hell, if The Times doesn't verify their stories, especially those that could result in violence if true, why should X verify them?
🚨 Breaking: @elonmusk removed New York Times' verification badge, following a flood of false information it published on the Israel-Gaza war 👇 pic.twitter.com/qljbsNRhlN
🚨 Breaking: @elonmusk removed New York Times' verification badge, following a flood of false information it published on the Israel-Gaza war 👇 pic.twitter.com/qljbsNRhlN
The way the rag worded their October 17 headline says it all: "Israeli Strike Kills Hundreds in Hospital, Palestinians Say." No comrades, it was Hamas that made the claim.
Both The New York Times and CNN were also caught using Hamas-style propaganda. That is, they used images from different incidents that showed buildings that had been completely destroyed. It wouldn't surprise me if they took it to the next step like Hamas did and used mannequins as injured Palestinians.
In one of its initial tweets about the bombing, The New York Times used a photo from an entirely different bombing site.
Isn't that like giving aid to the enemy?
I’ve traced the photo to Khan Yunis in southern Gaza, which is approximately 25 km from Gaza City where the hospital is located. https://t.co/TJj2HNU9mx pic.twitter.com/VHg8lnjaYPHere's another tweet to CNN this time:
— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) October 18, 2023
Hi @andersoncooper, why are you showing footage of completely destroyed buildings and rubble when talking about the hospital parking lot explosion when neither of those things are present there? https://t.co/WALnzuA2XF
— AG (@AGHamilton29) October 18, 2023
I could go on and on but if you want to read more about the actual rocket that fell short, you can read it on my blog here.
And if you're interested in seeing more of what did not happen, check out this tweet:
Full footage from TASS, no impact craters, interior spaces appear to be intact. Injuries from flying glass appear to have occurred. pic.twitter.com/XCP8mG5YGx
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) October 18, 2023
Elon Musk the CEO of X blasted The New York Times.
So the world has changed not only in the open anti-Semitism, but in the way it is now acceptable on campuses and in the media.The real tragedy of @NYTimes is that their propaganda isn’t even interesting.
Also, their feed is the Twitter equivalent of diarrhea. It’s unreadable.
They would have far more real followers if they only posted their top articles.
Same applies to all publications.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 2, 2023
No comments:
Post a Comment