2nd place US women's soccer team now rejects equal pay deal" calls it a PR stunt and "not good enough"

"Can you believe it? We came in 2nd, played poorly and they agree to pay
us the same as the men. Something's fishy. What a bunch of suckers. Hahaha!"

They lost to a 16-and-under boys soccer team in a scrimmage game and only came in second behind Canada at the Tokyo Olympics this year in a rather suck-worthy performance. Still, the U.S. women's soccer team has been demanding "equal pay" to that of the U.S. men's soccer team, in spite of the comparable monetary pittance the women bring in. 

Earlier in the week, the U.S. Soccer Federation offered the men's and women's teams identical contracts, and thus, equal pay in spite of the differences in their skill levels and their money-earning histories.

But the union representing the mediocre women's national team attacked the soccer federation's equal pay offer calling it a "PR stunt." Based on the athletic differences between men and women in most sports, soccer being a standout in ability, it's almost a believable claim because hardly anyone is interested in women's soccer until the olympics rolls around, and even then, not so much. Women's soccer takes in a mere fraction of what the men's teams do.

The union said that the offer was not "fair" nor made in "good faith," possibly because the federation refused to kiss the cleats of the female players. Forward [that's a field position in soccer] Alex Morgan said Wednesday that the female players "still need to chat" about the equal pay offer, and suggested that equality wasn't the team's primary goal after all. 

The goal may actually be to promote the LGBTQ+1.4 community and a pink-haired lesbian player on the women's national team who is clearly overpaid and her team is unable to defeat a team of 16-year-old boys who play for fun.

"We need to look line by line at what they're actually providing, because if you have equal but it's not even what we got before, or to the value that we are, then we still consider that to be not good enough," Morgan said.

In response to the women's national team's balderdash, the U.S. Soccer Federation said clearly that its offer of "identical contracts to the USWNT and USMNT, and to discuss equalizing prize money, is real, authentic and in good faith. A publicity stunt is a 90-minute one-sided movie."

The latter sentence about a 90-minute publicity stunt refers to LFG, the recently released HBO Max documentary (produced by propaganda news, CNN Films,) about the women's team's struggle for equal pay. The Wall Street Journal described LFG as a "good-looking" but "very politicized" film full of "outrageously one-sided arguments."

Perhaps the new contract should stipulate that salaries of players be based on a percentage of the proceeds the seasonal games collect at the gates. That would be fair and equitable, since equity is so important to the left.

Since Joe Biden [his Indian name is "Shines Through Both Ears"] was sworn into office, the women's soccer team has spiraled into decline in performance. While slated to "win it all" in Tokyo, they got humiliated by Sweden in a humiliating 3-0 ass-whooping and then were booted out of gold medal contention by Canada.

In 2019, the women's team sued the U.S. Soccer Federation for gender discrimination and more, in a $66 million lawsuit, which was dismissed by a federal judge who evidently saw the ridiculous suit as frivolous. 

Meanwhile, the U.S. men's soccer team defeated Mexico to win the CONCACAF Gold Cup, further undermining the crybaby argument for "equal pay."

Fill more seats, bring in more revenue, and then you can talk turkey.

Why not subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against the tech giants.

Tweet