Saturday, July 27, 2019

Chuck 'n Nancy upset SCOTUS ruled to fund wall:


Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi are upset with the Supreme Court giving President Trump (R-USA) a small victory regarding funding for the promised border wall. The liberal tag team said that it is a "regrettable" and "nonsensical" decision, which is exactly the opposite to the facts.

All the decision allows for is a mere $2.5 billion in Pentagon funds.

The Democrats complain when the GOP funds the military. Now they're complaining that some of the funds for the military are being used to keep illegal aliens from waltzing into the country unvetted. Actually, they aren't 'waltzing' in--they are making a dangerous journey to come here with children, often times not theirs, and some are dying or being sexually exploited in the process.

It's as if the Democrats have stock in the Mexican cartels.

The 5-4 ruling, which broke along party lines, allows President Trump to use military funds to start work on replacing fencing along our southern border in California, New Mexico and Arizona.

Earlier this month, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the Communist city of San Francisco had agreed with a lower-court ruling that prevented the government from tapping that funding. They don't want to stop illegal aliens from entering illegally because this is a major way for the Democratic Party to obtain future votes and grab power.

Trump declared a national emergency along the border to get up to $8.1 billion for wall construction, including the $2.5 billion from the Defense Department. He called the ruling a big win for "Border Security and the Rule of Law."

His Twitter finger at the ready, he tweeted:
"Wow! Big VICTORY on the Wall. The United States Supreme Court overturns lower court injunction, allows Southern Border Wall to proceed. Big WIN for Border Security and the Rule of Law!" 
Democrats criticized the court's logic and Trump's plans to use earmarked funds in an effort to come through on his signature campaign issue. Many argue a wall will not slow the flow of migrants into the United States. It would take a worse economy, fewer jobs and more border staffing, which the Democrats would also deny.

Arizona Rep. Raul M. Grijalva, whose district runs along the U.S.-Mexico border, called Trump's emergency declaration a "pathetic attempt to circumvent Congress." 

Actually, it would be pathetic if Trump was unable to circumvent Congress, but he did.

"Trump’s fake emergency was nothing more than a pathetic ploy to circumvent Congress and build his monument to his racist policies. This fight is not over, and I will continue fighting Trump’s efforts to destroy our environment and militarize border communities. #NoBorderWall," he tearfully tweeted soon after the ruling broke and he realized Trump won.

There is nothing racist about a wall--that's just stupid. Even Robert Frost wrote "Good Fences Make Good Neighbors," and although Frost was a privileged white guy [in the small racist minds of the left], he was not referring to race whatsoever.

House Speaker Nancy "Dancing Dentures" Pelosi (D-CA), used her frenetic hands to call the ruling "deeply flawed" over Twitter.
"This evening’s Supreme Court ruling allowing @realDonaldTrump to steal military funds to spend on a wasteful, ineffective border wall rejected by Congress is deeply flawed. Our Founders designed a democracy governed by the people — not a monarchy."
Right-it isn't Camelot--that was JFK. 

Pelosi doesn't really mean anything she says most of the time.

For his part, Senate Minority Leader Chuck "Considerable Nostrils" Schumer reminded his Twitter followers that when Trump was still a candidate for president, he promised us Mexico would pay for a border wall. 

Yadda, yadda, yadda. Do we really care how it gets built? Does he really think Trump's base actually believes everything Trump says?

Schumer tweeted:
"It’s a sad day when the president is cheering a decision that may allow him to steal funds from our military to pay for an ineffective and expensive wall for which he promised Mexico would foot the bill." 
Suddenly the Democrats worry that the military will not have enough money to buy assault rifles.

Please consider following this blog and feel free to click on the ads on this page. It costs nothing, and may just save your life. Or not.





No comments:

Post a Comment

Report details Biden Administration Weaponized Government

Joe Not-so Cool A damning 17,000-page report from the House Select Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government has uncovered di...