Leftists threaten Starbucks boycott if Schultz doesn't do what they say: but #IfTheyBoycottWeWillCome

The tolerant left has threatened to boycott the coffee and creative writing inspiration supplier, Starbucks, if the former CEO of the burnt coffee chain doesn't do what they say. Howard Schultz said he plans to run for president in 2020 and the leftists are saying, "You run at your own peril. We leftists will not go to Starbucks for our coffee if you do what your constitutional rights say that you can. We have spoken."

Schultz spoke in an interview with “60 Minutes” that aired Sunday night and revealed his potential plans for the race.

But Schultz’s remarks were not well received by the Left because they hope to unseat President Trump and believes an Independent like Schultz could take away votes from the eventual Democratic nominee. Of course, it's also probable that he would also siphon votes from conservatives who are now less enchanted by Trump's tweeting.

In response to Schultz’s flirtation with a presidential candidacy, many on the Left suggested boycotting the burnt coffee chain until he calls off his run. 

But maybe he doesn't care if the burnt coffee chain succeeds or fails because it isn't his problem anymore. Besides, if Starbucks fails now that he's gone doesn't that make him look better than Kevin Johnson, the current CEO?

Neera Tanden, the president of the left-wing intolerant Center for American Progress, said she would start a boycott against Starbucks because Schultz’s run “will help Trump win.”

That's what conservatives thought of Trump's run in 2016--we thought Clinton would win.

“Vanity projects that help destroy democracy are disgusting. If he enters the race, I will start a Starbucks boycott because I’m not giving a penny that will end up in the election coffers of a guy who will help Trump win,” Tanden, a green tea drinker, tweeted.

Side note: More choices does not “destroy democracy,” but one should expect nothing less than the president of a progressive think tank.

One of Tanden’s leftist minions at ThinkProgress, Ian Millhiser, called on MoveOn, the Democratic National Committee, unions, and other Democrat campaigns to boycott the coffee shop to force Schultz to drop his bid.

“If Howard Schultz gets into the presidential race, @MoveOn, @IndivisibleTeam, the @DNC, the major unions, and the major presidential campaigns should all use their email lists to promote a Starbucks boycott until he drops out,” Millhiser tweeted on his computer at a local Starbucks.

Commentator Carol Roth noted that Millhiser and other stooges are essentially calling on people to “impair the livelihood of myriad workers to bully someone out of running for office.” 

But Tanden, Millhiser and their ilk have a good reason: they don't like Trump and don't care what happens to those victims of their collateral damage that a boycott would cause.

Maybe conservatives ought to do what they did for Chic fil-A and make special trips to buy their burnt coffee at a nearby Starbucks. Then when Schultz gets on the ballot, vote for Trump.

Starbucks is about as progressive [aka communistic] an establishment as one can get. And while boycotting their crappachino mocha grande lattes feels so good, even for conservatives, we can own the left by giving them our business for now, let him get on the ballot, then vote for Trump.

Let's make the hashtag #IfTheyBoycottWeWillCome go viral. 

I hope that 2019 will be the year you follow Brain Flushings and have a few laughs while you get a conservative viewpoint. Politics is the new NFL without the mindless kneeling and this blog will both inform you and hopefully entertain you bigly.

Tweet