Zimmerman's defense team |
The above might be the way MSNBC wants to portray the situation, but I suspect this might not be fully accurate. I wasn't there, you weren't there, and we will never be absolutely certain of the truth, but I think the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle. The left sees it in black and white, or shall we say, black v white. They changed their tactic and said that it isn't a racial case, but they only did that because they learned that Zimmerman was involved with black youths in a tutoring program, and he wasn't a good candidate for the left's assertions.
However, a case might be made to show that Trayvon was the racist if Rachel Jeantel's testimony about what he said to her on the cell phone is true. Calling Zimmerman a creepy ass cracker is not a term of endearment. She may not have thought that "creepy ass cracker" is a racially motivated statement, but that's because she might have special needs herself, and not the defense lawyer.
As I watch the trial on Fox News (not a big fan of MSNBC here) it's clear that the prosecution witnesses are making a better case for the defense, and if this remains so, Zimmerman should get a "not guilty" verdict. If he doesn't, the criminal justice system will have been compromised by liberal politics.
But what do I know--I'm just another creepy ass cracker.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment