"Journalist" scrambles to delete the truth about John Fetterman

"My arms, them I hold to be self-evidently"

You know, we all know, that Pennsylvania senate candidate John Fetterman has suffered a serious cognitive impairment after suffering a stroke on May 13th of this year, just days prior to his winning of the Democratic nomination for the Senate. Anyone with a decent heart wishes him well and anyone with a decent brain wishes he would not win the Senate seat because he is unable to accurately process verbal information without the use of a computer assistance providing closed captioning that helps him understand to some degree what is being said.

On Saturday morning, a Rolling Stone journalist had the audacity to tell the truth about Fetterman, an act that may cost Kara Voght dearly.

Since the MSNBC interview, Fetterman's mental condition is becoming increasingly apparent to the public and it's much worse than his campaign previously revealed. The fact that even with the closed captioning, Fetterman does not always understand what is being said is having many voters feeling they were lied to.

For months, Fetterman's campaign had insisted he was generally fine, and that a complete recovery was imminent. But the massive stroke he suffered has made it impossible to hide the fact that he is unable to properly process verbal information. The claim that he "was fine" morphed to "he's disabled, and you are an ableist bigot if you question his fitness for office." 

Fetterman's wife, who is not running for public office, not only defended him but went on to  demand there be “consequences” for the MSNBC reporter who exposed her husband’s condition. Free speech should not trump Fetterman's disorganized speech, especially by a reporter who was supposed to be in the pocket of the Democratic Party, like all good legacy media "reporters."

Gisele Fetterman says NBC reporter @DashaBurns should face "consequences" for exposing her husband's inability to make "small talk" without a computer. pic.twitter.com/STQB8YDmjK

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) October 14, 2022

But rather than Gisele Fetterman being called out for her tyrannical, unconstitutional demand, the slag received a powder puff piece written about her in Rolling Stone by political creative writer Kara Voght.

Voght sought to fawn praise on Gisele and unwittingly said the quiet part out loud, referring to her as the "de facto" candidate over her verbally compromised husband. As soon as she realized what she had done, she scrambled to delete her accurate assessment but it was too late.

Jim Treacher caught it and tweeted:

That was quick! https://t.co/FRCjUZiWKh pic.twitter.com/0Gt7lTN9qq

— jimtreacher.substack.com (@jtLOL) October 15, 2022

But don't go there--the page no longer exists. However, you might want to check out the Rolling Stone article linked below by Chuck Ross:

Deleted an “imprecise” tweet referring to Gisele Fetterman as the de facto candidate, but it’s still in the story. https://t.co/VEmeIaosYk pic.twitter.com/Bw8UsbeRUq

— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) October 15, 2022

It seems that John Fetterman is so brain-damaged and unable to perform the required duties in the Senate that he needs his wife to pull his strings? Who do they think he is; Joe Biden? As mentioned, like Jill Biden, Gisele Fetterman is not a candidate in this Senate race. She has no business making any demands on the so-called free press, but she loves to say that she's the "brains of the operation."

Gisele Fetterman loves claiming that she’s the “brains of the operation.”

Maybe it’s time we believed her pic.twitter.com/2Lz7ypWjzd

— John Hasson (@SonofHas) October 15, 2022

The truth is, if Gisele Fetterman really is the "de facto" candidate, and it seems like she is, John Fetterman should drop out of the race immediately. Gisele is irrelevant and has no business, no right in fact, to pretend she is more than the wife of John Fetterman. Anything that goes beyond the spousal support of her candidate husband is misplaced ego needs.

* * *

Hey folks, consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Critical Race Theory, ignorance, The New York Times, and bovine flatulence. You also help me. Thanks.

* * *

Kara Voght's tweet and article unwittingly points out that John Fetterman [aka Fetterwoman] is unfit to serve as US senator, just like Joe Biden is unfit to serve as President of the United States of America. If the Democratic Party cared more about the country than they care about power, both would have been retired from public office.

Tweet