Rep. Swalwell lies: Republicans "want to ban interracial marriage"

"I can hold it in; I can . . .  I can. Oops!"

It's one thing to sleep with a Chinese Communist spy; it's another thing to marry her. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) did not marry Fang Fang, he just boffed her. So here he is now saying on Tuesday that Republicans all think like him and want to ban interracial marriages. I guess he thinks yours truly doesn't count, or the countless Republicans with interracial marriages. Swalwell is a much better farter than he is s Congressman.

He made the bizarre statement after SCOTUS's draft opinion [assuming it isn't a hoax] outlined the majority's intention to ban Roe v. Wade. If this draft is the real thing, and if the decision to ban it pans out, we can thank the three Trump-appointed justices for the change.

Swalwell, obviously pulling this garbage from his butt, said that Republicans would not be content with "banning abortion," and also want to ban marriage between people of different races. It's obvious he makes stuff up as he goes along. 

Even Mitch McConnell's wife is of a different race, she's Asian, but get a load of former MSNBC host, Chris Matthews' son's wedding guests photo [below] and check out all the diversity in the crowd.

The Left's idea of diversity: it's the "where's Waldo" of diversity.

"The Republicans won’t stop with banning abortion. They want to ban interracial marriage. Do you want to save that?" Swalwell wrote. "Well, then you should probably vote."

There is not a single source he can show that supports his wild lie.

The left is so afraid that Roe v. Wade will be overturned and women who seek an abortion might need to travel to another state that permits the killing of babies in the womb or soon thereafter. Banning it will not take away the state's rights to keep abortion on the books.

Biden warned that if the Supreme Court moves to overturn Roe v. Wade, as it signaled in the leaked opinion to Politico, issues regarding right to marriage, right to contraception and more come into question. The Catholic Church has not yet weighed in with their opinion as to whether Biden will go to hell or purgatory.

* * *

Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.

* * *

"One of the issues this court, many members of the court, have not acknowledged is there is a right to privacy in the Constitution," Biden mumbled about the right to privacy, which is not in the Constitution just as the right to an abortion is missing. Even the late RBG agreed that Roe v. Wade was a poorly conceived piece of legislation. 

Tweet