Democrat braintrust Hirono casts her "hell no" vote for SCOTUS confirmation

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) showed her level of class when she tried to immortalize her vote against the confirmation of soon-to-be Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Monday night for U.S. Supreme Court. It was all low--the level of class, that is.

Hirono diddy-bopped up to the table and pointed her thumbs down and said, brilliantly, "hell no" as she cast her vote.

And while Hirono's horrendous display and negative vote had no effect on the outcome of the voting, as Amy Coney Barrett was indeed confirmed in spite of the feeble theatrics, the dumbest senator on Capitol Hill was but an encapsulation of the anger and frustration the Democrats felt in their cold, godless hearts. Even Chucky Schumer look as if he was going to "thrown down" and mixed it up with his Republican colleagues until he realized it was a bad idea when he looked Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) in the eye.

Hirono, a person who you will never bump into at a Mensa meeting, treated Barrett horrendously during the confirmation hearings, asking irrelevant questions out of left field such as, whether she ever "made unwanted requests for sexual favors or committed any physical or verbal harassment or assault of a sexual nature?"

When Barrett answered "No," the idiot from Hawaii told her that she asks the question to all nominees who come before the committees on which she sits [her fat butt].

Why does Hirono ask everyone that question, is a good question to ask Hirono. In fact, I'd check her computer for porn, just in case she's projecting.

Hirono also went after Barrett for using the term "sexual preference," and lectured her on the term.

"Let me make clear, 'sexual preference' is an offensive and outdated term," the idiot who is only qualified to hand out leis at the airport said. 

"It is used by the anti-LGBTQ activists to suggest that sexual orientation is a choice. It is not. Sexual orientation is a key part of a person's identity... So if it is your view that sexual orientation is merely a 'preference,' as you noted, then the LGBTQ community should be rightly concerned whether you will uphold their constitutional right to marry."

Of course, Hirono was only blowing smoke somewhere because Democrats have often used that term prior to her lecture to a woman whose IQ is 130 points higher than hers.

Hirono's drama queen antics was criticized by Republicans on social media and her office was contacted for comment by Fox News, but they have yet to respond. Perhaps they are still reading the manual on how to open the computer.

All Republicans, except for RINO Sen. Susan Collins, voted in favor of the confirmation; every Democrat opposed it. 

The Supreme Court issued a press release stating that Barrett will start her now role after Chief Justice and unpredictable John Roberts administers her judicial oath on Tuesday. Justice Clarence Thomas, a true judicial textualist, administered the constitutional oath at Monday's ceremony.

Barrett gave the audience a constitutional primer at the South Lawn of the White House Monday night:

 "It is the job of a senator to pursue her policy preferences. In fact, it would be a dereliction of duty for her to put policy goals aside. By contrast, it is the job of a judge to resist her policy preferences. It would be a dereliction of duty for her to give into them. Federal judges don't stand for election. Thus, they have no basis for claiming that their preferences reflect those of the people."

Crazy Mazie was not in attendance.

C'mon, man, gimme a break. You know you want to follow Brain Flushings--it's free and worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, an angel gets its wings and a liberal sheds a tear. C'mon.

Tweet