'House Dems sort of rebuke use of word "motherf***er' Trump

House Democrats are not comfortable with going public with their vulgarity, preferring to keep it behind closed doors with the family, and when the newly sworn-in Rep. Rashida Tlaib said of the President of the United States of America that she would like to impeach the motherfuc*er, it looked and sounded bad for the cameras.

Her son was standing next to her when she said it, and it obviously didn't bother the little foul-mouth bast**d. In fact, the crowd standing around the disgusting b**ch woo-hooed and cheered.

"We're going to go in there, and we're going to impeach the motherf***er," the Michigan Democrat said at Thursday MoveOn rally in Washington, D.C.

When asked about Tlaib's use of profanity in an MSNBC town hall the following morning, House Speaker Nancy "Hyper Hands" Pelosi (D-CA) responded with a predictable"what-aboutism" remark, that it wasn't worse than anything Trump had said in the past. 

Yes, and when Trump said it, many of us on the right were appalled and we said so. Why aren't you condemning that s**t? I know--because you're scared of the new radical left.

"I'm not in the censorship business. I don't like that language, I wouldn't use that language, I don't establish language standards for my colleagues," she said with a frenetic hand display.

Pelosi, however, was more critical of the impeachment talk, saying that it consolidated the president's base and disclaiming, "That is not the position of the House Democratic Caucus." 

She knows what impeachment did for Bill Clinton and how it hurt conservatives.

"I do think that we want to be unified and bring people together. Impeachment is a very divisive approach to take and we shouldn’t take it … without the facts," she said, hands a-dancin' to homophobic host Joy Reid later in the interview, which is set to air Friday at 10 p.m. ET.

When asked by CNN's John Berman  what he thought about Tlaib's remarks, House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) said, "I don't like that language. More to the point, I disagree with what she said. It is too early to talk about that intelligently." [A Democrat talking about anything intelligently is an oxymoron.]

"We have to get the facts. We will see where the facts lead," he added. "Maybe that will lead to impeachment. Maybe it won't. It is much too early."

Most Democrats don't care about facts, they care about how they feel about Trump. And they tend to find a victim and then look for a crime, much like the Mueller probe.

In interviews with Politico, several of Tlaib's fellow Democrats were critical as well. "Mueller hasn’t even produced his report yet!" Wisconsin Rep. Ron Kind said. "People should cool their jets a little bit, let the prosecutors do their job and finish the investigation."

"Inappropriate," Rep. Jim Costa (D-CA) said. "As elected officials I think we should be expected to set a high bar… It’s not helpful."

Even clueless Democratic Rep. Brad Sherman (CA), who said he planned to reintroduce articles of impeachment against Trump this week in spite of no substantiating evidence, was critical, with Politico reporting his "eyes bulged in disbelief," and he was overcome with testicular twitching.

"That’s not language I would use … I think the office of the presidency should be treated with respect," he said.

Well here we are in the beginning of a new year and the world still hasn't come to an end with President Trump in the White House, in spite of what the media and the left [but I repeat myself] would have you believe.

I hope that you will follow Brain Flushings throughout the year and feel free to comment on any issues of concern. Please subscribe and check out the sponsors on these pages too.

Tweet