Posts
Washington Post genius Theodore R. Johnson, wants to make the black vote count five-thirds that of those of other races. Johnson, who is currently calling himself white, believes this move will empower blacks and in doing so, will make his own vote count more than others. A little self-serving yes, but I'm sure Mr. Johnson wasn't even thinking out of self-interest. After all, he writes for a liberal rag and is a liberal hack himself.
Johnson is a former White House fellow and a Ph.D candidate at Northeastern University where he is allegedly studying law and policy.
"Racial reconciliation is impossible without some kind of broad-based, systemic reparations. But if a pecuniary answer can't fix the structural disadvantages--and it can't--what can?" Johnson writes.
So systemic reparations would be reversing the antebellum period, making white people of today be less valued as human beings in their choices and opinions than blacks. But that also goes for brown folks from places like India, people who never had skin in the game. It also goes for Hispanics who make up a large portion of the voting block, as well as Asians and native Americans.
It's always easy to ask for change that is advantageous to you and your people at the expense of others and their people. But unfortunately for Johnson, not only is it unconstitutional, but it is also unethical and as immoral as slavery was in this country and continues in the world of today.
Johnson wants a black elitist society where government is dictated by race, not principals. Where the Democratic party, the party of Obama, would dominate the land and one-party rule would enjoy reign over all people.
Johnson tries to justify his argument by claiming it to be the only way to solve the "structural disadvantages" black face, but it's obvious that he was able to circumvent those disadvantages and become a successful, albeit racist writer.
The way to solve the "structural disadvantages" is to look at the structure of the black situation in this country. Let's face it, we've elected [twice] a black so-called president so somehow the structure was in Obama's favor.
The problem causing a disadvantage for blacks is rooted in the black family--absent father figures due to out-of-wedlock marriages being the prime problem. Of course this is not unique to black families, but it is overwhelmingly disproportionate to other races.
Another problem is how the black media promotes a racial divide and hatred for the law.
Johnson calls for blacks to have a larger political voice. But if white people like Rachel Dolezai who work for the NAACP, or Shaun King a key figure in the Black Lives Matter movement, call themselves black, and the left doesn't argue the point, doesn't that present a problem to the rest of us "white folk" who want a 5/3 vote too?
What's the matter, Theodore, a black president, black head of the Justice Department [twice], senior presidential adviser, and other high level black in the administration aren't enough? Now you want to get a larger political advantage by diminishing my vote?
Sorry sphincter-breath--you cannot have it. I fought for my country, my flag and my right to vote and it's worth at least as much as yours.
So piss off, you freaking racist.
Tweet
 |
| Theodore Racist Johnson |
Johnson is a former White House fellow and a Ph.D candidate at Northeastern University where he is allegedly studying law and policy.
"Racial reconciliation is impossible without some kind of broad-based, systemic reparations. But if a pecuniary answer can't fix the structural disadvantages--and it can't--what can?" Johnson writes.
So systemic reparations would be reversing the antebellum period, making white people of today be less valued as human beings in their choices and opinions than blacks. But that also goes for brown folks from places like India, people who never had skin in the game. It also goes for Hispanics who make up a large portion of the voting block, as well as Asians and native Americans.
It's always easy to ask for change that is advantageous to you and your people at the expense of others and their people. But unfortunately for Johnson, not only is it unconstitutional, but it is also unethical and as immoral as slavery was in this country and continues in the world of today.
Johnson wants a black elitist society where government is dictated by race, not principals. Where the Democratic party, the party of Obama, would dominate the land and one-party rule would enjoy reign over all people.
Johnson tries to justify his argument by claiming it to be the only way to solve the "structural disadvantages" black face, but it's obvious that he was able to circumvent those disadvantages and become a successful, albeit racist writer.
The way to solve the "structural disadvantages" is to look at the structure of the black situation in this country. Let's face it, we've elected [twice] a black so-called president so somehow the structure was in Obama's favor.
The problem causing a disadvantage for blacks is rooted in the black family--absent father figures due to out-of-wedlock marriages being the prime problem. Of course this is not unique to black families, but it is overwhelmingly disproportionate to other races.
Another problem is how the black media promotes a racial divide and hatred for the law.
Johnson calls for blacks to have a larger political voice. But if white people like Rachel Dolezai who work for the NAACP, or Shaun King a key figure in the Black Lives Matter movement, call themselves black, and the left doesn't argue the point, doesn't that present a problem to the rest of us "white folk" who want a 5/3 vote too?
What's the matter, Theodore, a black president, black head of the Justice Department [twice], senior presidential adviser, and other high level black in the administration aren't enough? Now you want to get a larger political advantage by diminishing my vote?Sorry sphincter-breath--you cannot have it. I fought for my country, my flag and my right to vote and it's worth at least as much as yours.
So piss off, you freaking racist.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment